RESOURCE CENTER
KICK ASS OFFERS
MOST COMMENTED ARTICLES
MOST RECENT COMMENTS
THIS MONTH's ISSUE
FEATURE Awesome Upgrades: The best PC upgrades in every price range.HOW TO Connect your PC to your surround-sound audio systemProtect Your PC We put 10 of the most popular antivirus programs to the test to see which will protect you best. Android Revealed Find out how the Google-powered HTC G1 stacks up against its rivals.






Apple MacBook Pro
Posted 06/26/2008 at 12:57:29pm
While it's true that a FW 800 port can be used to feed a FW400 device, here's a case where having both helped me decide to go with the MBP. I am a semi-pro musician and I use my MBP as a mobile recording studio (yep, and GarageBand is all the software I need).
When choosing an interface box, I completely skipped anything that limited me to a USB connection, because I've heard too many gripes from folks who say that the USB connection leads to skips, odd pops, etc in the recorded signal. I use a Presonus Firebox 10 and it is clean, clear and transparent.
Anyway, that talks to my MBP via FW400 and the MBP sends the processed data straight to an external FW800 drive. I believe that this gives me a cleaner path than the on-board drive because the boot drive is used for paging memory, etc. Can't do this without both ports. Thanks for the article.