Posted 03/05/2009 at 09:54:27am

Yes, yes, double yes.  More competition equals faster components and lower prices.  If this happens it would probably also push Intel to start developing some competing graphics cards which would also be good for the market.  Thank you Nvidia!

Posted 10/29/2008 at 07:00:48am

Innovation is great and i'm all for it, but what exactly was the point of changing the name of Add/Remove programs?  Just making something a different name than it was before isn't any kind of innovation.  Again, I used to be able to use the old version of office with my eyes closed, but now I have to go searching to do even the most insignificant task because the same features are on a different menu, or on a different ribbon (most worthless "innovation" ever).  Change for the sake of change doesn't make things better, it just annoys people and makes them less receptive to the real innovation that is in the new product. 

Posted 09/22/2008 at 09:54:46am

I really don't like change for the sake of change.  I used to be able to work in the old office with my eyes closed.  When I changed over to Office 2007 it took me forever to find anything.  If the new applications add functionality fine, but why is it necessary to completely redesign something that everyone is used to just to make it look different?  The new features could have been added while keeping the same basic interface design and everyone would have been much happier. 

Posted 01/17/2008 at 12:54:20pm

I was considering buying one of these boxes but after reading this review and hearing about the slow transfer speed I am reconsidering. Does anyone have a recommendation for a better stand alone NAS device available now? I need something with at least 2 TB of storage to store a large amount of video. i would like to just slap an array onto an existing server but these will hold sensitive data which can't be connected to our office network.