RESOURCE CENTER
MOST COMMENTED ARTICLES
FeaturesRip DVDs for Playback on Your iPhone, PSP, Xbox 360, PS3, AppleTV, or Any H.264-Enabled Player
1 NEW COMMENT(S) | 25 TOTAL COMMENTS
FROM THE ARCHIVEValve's Gabe Newell: "Most DRM Strategies Are Just Dumb"
16 NEW COMMENT(S) | 22 TOTAL COMMENTS
MOST RECENT COMMENTS
FROM THE ARCHIVEValve's Gabe Newell: "Most DRM Strategies Are Just Dumb"
16 NEW COMMENT(S) | 22 TOTAL COMMENTS
NewsStay Classy, San Diego; "Britney Spears," "WWE" Most Popular Search Terms
1 NEW COMMENT(S) | 2 TOTAL COMMENTS
THIS MONTH's ISSUE






Do Higher MP3 Bit Rates Pay Off?
Posted 04/20/2007 at 07:04:46pm
"Many people agree that a Vorbis file remains indistinguishable from the original source material at q5 (~160kbps), whereas for MP3 a bit-rate of 192kbps is required to reach the same standard." Quote from my website discussing optimum bit-rates for compressed audio (Vorbis being the variable-rate). For more please see: http://www.cassette2cd.co.uk/mp3.htm Good study, though after invesigating this myself, I am not at all surpised to 'hear' your results. I disagree in principle with the view that monitors (even huge theatre speakers) would reveal the imperfections, but that in itself would make another interesting experiment. Just because a piece of equipment delivers massive volume doesn't naturally make it more accurate when it comes to faithful reproduction does it?