<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.maximumpc.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Maximum PC GT200 RSS Feed</title>
 <link>http://www.maximumpc.com/tags/GT200</link>
 <description>used for category lists, takes arguments</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rumor: Nvidia to Refresh GT200 with DirectX 10.1 Support</title>
 <link>http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/rumor_nvidia_refresh_gt200_directx_101_support</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;At long last, Nvidia may finally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/14383/1/&quot;&gt;adding DirectX 10.1 support&lt;/a&gt; to its videocards, assuming Fudzilla is right on the money. According to the news and rumor site, Nvidia&#039;s GT200 will be refreshed to a 40nm manufacturing process and the new chips will sport DX10.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To date, ATI has been the only one to offer DX10.1 support on some of its videocards (yes, we&#039;re completely ignoring S3&#039;s Chrome series), a minor extension to DX10 that thus far hasn&#039;t meant much for gamers. To to fuel the conspiracy flames, that could change with Nvidia jumping on board. Remember that  DX10.1 instructions did at one point show a performance boost on ATI cards in &lt;em&gt;Assassin&#039;s Creed&lt;/em&gt;, but after a patch removed support for the instruction set, some accused Ubisoft of bowing to pressure from Nvidia after the GPU maker sponsored the title with its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_twimtbp_gameslist.html&quot;&gt;The Way It&#039;s Meant To Be Played&lt;/a&gt; program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any event, it looks like refresh will come on the tail end of summer or early fall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/u69/NvidiaLogo.png&quot; width=&quot;350&quot; height=&quot;262&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small&quot;&gt;Image Credit: Nvidia &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/rumor_nvidia_refresh_gt200_directx_101_support#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/article_type/news_amp_views">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3537">api</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/2946">build a pc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/5881">directx 10.1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/gpu">gpu</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/graphics">graphics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3691">GT200</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/hardware">hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/nvidia">nvidia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3245">rumor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/videocard">videocard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:15:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Lilly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6753 at http://www.maximumpc.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Burning Question: Are All Nvidia G84 and G86 Parts Bad?</title>
 <link>http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/burning_question_are_all_nvidia_g84_and_g86_parts_bad</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;When it rains, it pours, and Nvidia could use a good downpour to put out the flames. Perhaps literally. Just last week Dave Murphy reported Nvidia was setting aside $150 to $200 million to cover warranty and repair costs associated with an &amp;quot;abnormal failure rate&amp;quot; in its mobile graphics cards, news of which sent Nvidia stock spiraling downward. Now there&#039;s speculation that the failures might not be limited to just a specific batch of notebook GPUs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rumor, news, and review site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/07/09/nvidia-g84-g86-bad&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Inquirer&lt;/em&gt; is saying&lt;/a&gt; that &amp;quot;all the G84 and G86 parts are bad. Period. No exceptions.&amp;quot; That includes both mobile and desktop parts. According to &lt;em&gt;The Inq&lt;/em&gt;, both use the same application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and both ASICs are plagued by a heat related problem originating from an un-named substrate or bumping material. Because of this, &lt;em&gt;The Inq&lt;/em&gt; surmises more failures are imminent. But are they?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;He (Nvidia) Said&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080702/nvda8-k.html&quot;&gt;Nvidia maintains&lt;/a&gt; that the failures remain limited to a batch of previous generation GPU and MCP products using a different die/packaging material, and that &amp;quot;all newly manufactured products and all products currently shipping in volume have a different and more robust material set.&amp;quot; And if you already own a G84 or G86 product, OEMs are offering &lt;a href=&quot;http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?lc=en&amp;amp;cc=us&amp;amp;docname=c01087277&amp;amp;dlc=en&quot;&gt;BIOS updates&lt;/a&gt; and new drivers designed to contain potential thermal issues. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;She (&lt;em&gt;The Inquirer&lt;/em&gt;) Said&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;em&gt;The Inq&lt;/em&gt;, Nvidia&#039;s official stance doesn&#039;t fall in line with what&#039;s really going on. Donning a detective cap, the online news outlet claims to have talked to several analysts and engineers. The former are supposedly saying they were told the failures only affect a specific batch of parts HP got, and not any other OEMs. But the engineers all say there&#039;s no way Nvidia would change the assembly processor or material set for a specific batch or an end-of-life part, so if one batch is bad, then they&#039;re all bad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/u69/8600M-GT.png&quot; width=&quot;415&quot; height=&quot;234&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Making Sense of it All&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Innocent until proven guilty would apply in this case. Conspiracy theories rarely pan out, and a cover-up of this magnitude would be extremely difficult to pull off. To surmise that all G84 and G86 parts are bad means taking to heart several un-named sources and putting together pieces of a puzzle that don&#039;t appear to fit. No matter what analysts might be claiming behind closed doors, Nvidia&#039;s official stance doesn&#039;t peg the problem squarely on a specific batch of HP notebooks. So even if a group of anonymous engineers are correct in thinking Nvidia wouldn&#039;t switch substrates for a specific batch, it wouldn&#039;t matter because Nvidia has not denied the problem affects more than just HP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Should I Be Worried?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First and foremost, don&#039;t panic. An &amp;quot;abnormal failure rate&amp;quot; isn&#039;t an automatic death knell, and unless you&#039;re seeing unusually high temperatures, you likely have nothing to worry about. If you own a mobile or desktop part sporting G84 or G86 silicon, check your vendor&#039;s website for any BIOS updates, new drivers, or recall notices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think - is this much ado about nothing, or does Nvidia have something to hide? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/u69/8600M-GT.png&quot; width=&quot;415&quot; height=&quot;234&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small&quot;&gt;Image Credit: Nvidia &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/burning_question_are_all_nvidia_g84_and_g86_parts_bad#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/article_type/news_amp_views">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3540">build a rig</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3689">G84</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3690">G86</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/gpu">gpu</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/graphics">graphics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/taxonomy/term/3691">GT200</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/hardware">hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/nvidia">nvidia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.maximumpc.com/geek_tested/videocard">videocard</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:11:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Lilly</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2674 at http://www.maximumpc.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
