Supreme Court Rules that GPS Tracking is a Search

Ryan Whitwam

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the Fourth Amendment does indeed preclude law enforcement from attaching GPS tracking devices to vehicles without a warrant. While this is the theme of the rare unanimous decision, the actual language is more nuanced. The government’s position was that a GPS tracker was not a “search”, but the court disagreed.

In the case at issue, the government claimed to have probable cause, but had not obtained a warrant. Due to this oversight, the Supreme Court opted to withhold a decision on whether or not a warrant is always required for this type of search. From the language of the decision, it appears that the month-long surveillance in this case should have required a warrant in the court’s opinion, but shorter periods of surveillance might not. Five of the justices did affirm that physically attaching a GPS tracker to a vehicle was a search, though.

The court stopped short of saying that a probable-cause warrant was required in all circumstances, but by classifying GPS tracking as a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, it has set a powerful precedent. it is likely that police will seek warrants more often in order to avoid these questions in future cases.

Around the web

by CPMStar (Sponsored) Free to play

Comments