Published on Maximum PC (http://www.maximumpc.com)


Qnap TS-209 Pro II
Created 09/03/2008 - 12:08pm

Maximum IT
    • IBM Still Dominating Green500 List
    • EU Extends Oracle-Sun Deadline
    • Oracle and SpringSource Launch "Project Gemini"

    Sponsored
SEE MORE MAXIMUM IT
News
  • AOL is Now "Aol." Still Probably Doomed
  • DDR3 Shipments to Surpass DDR2 in 2010, says Supplier
  • Roku Opens Channel Store, Disappoints with No Hulu
  • Symantec Says IE Vulnerable to New Exploit
  • Microsoft Offers to Pay News Corp to "De-List" From Google
SEE MORE NEWS
Reviews

Qnap TS-209 Pro II

Posted 09/03/08 at 03:08:40 PM  by David Murphy

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Based on the name alone, one would expect Qnap’s TS-209 Pro II NAS box to offer more features than its predecessors—particularly our leader in this storage category, Qnap’s TS-109 Pro. And while the former does allow for increased capacity, it does not provide significant improvements in performance or offer more features than the TS-109 Pro, which has been out for more than a year.

The TS-209 Pro II differs from the TS-109 Pro in two fundamental ways: First, the TS-209 Pro II is a two-bay device that only requires you to remove a faceplate to access the hot-swap drive bays, a much simpler process than the disassembly required to stick a new drive in the single-bay TS-109 Pro. Second, the TS-209 Pro II sports 256MB of internal DDR II RAM, double the internal memory of the TS-109 Pro.

We assumed—perhaps incorrectly—that this additional memory would do something, anything, for the TS-209 Pro II’s benchmark performance. It does not. In fact, even after we added a speedy Velociraptor drive to the unit to eliminate any kind of hard drive bottleneck, the TS-209 Pro II was still unable to top the TS-109 Pro in any benchmark. The TS-209 Pro II took an extra 18 seconds to transfer 659MB (180 files) from our computer to our NAS in our small-file test. In our large-file test, the TS-209 Pro II took more than a minute longer than the TS-109 Pro to transfer a single 2.79-gigabyte file.

The TS-209 Pro II is fast when compared against the entire category of NAS devices. But it’s not faster than our speed champion, the TS-109 Pro. Nor do any compelling features push it above and beyond its predecessor. The latest firmware update to the TS-109 Pro gives that device the same features and options as the TS-209 Pro II, including a BitTorrent downloading application, a networked webcam surveillance application, and an iTunes streaming service. The TS-209 Pro II differs only in its RAID offerings, due to its support for two hard drives versus the TS-109 Pro’s one.

We dislike that the TS-209 Pro II drops the eSATA connection that was included with the TS-109 Pro. It’s not a mission-critical deletion, but we’d still much prefer to back up the contents of our NAS box over a speedy SATA connection rather than USB. It would also be nice to have a friendlier hot-swap setup in the front of the TS-209 Pro II. Removing the front bezel doesn’t pain us, but in a perfect world, we'd be able to insert drive without having to take anything off of the device first.

The TS-209 Pro II is a fast product with a bounty of features beyond what we typically see in NAS products, it’s just not among the speediest NAS devices we’ve tested. If you don’t need the increased storage that a second drive bay brings, you’re better off purchasing one of the company’s faster single-drive options—like the TS-109 Pro. 

Qnap TS-209 Pro II
DUNDER MIFFLIN

Faster transfer rates than average, absurd number of features, informative front display.

WERNHAM-HOGG

Not the fastest NAS box we've tested, features not at all different from previous models, only USB connections for external backup.

score:7
Qnap
Benchmarks

Qnap TS-209 Pro II Qnap TS-109 Pro
Size N/A
N/A
PC to NAS, small (min:sec)
0:55 0:37
PC to NAS, large (min:sec)
3:45 2:30
NAS to PC, small (min:sec)
0:39 0:38
NAS to PC, large (min:sec) 2:34
2:25
Best scores are bolded. We used the contents of Maximum PC’s November 2007 CD for the small-file testing, and a single 2.79GB file for the large-file testing. All scores are averages of three transfer trials.
COMMENTS:
TAGS: storage, networking, hardware, qnap, reviews, web exclusive, nas boxes
COMMENTS
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Technology News

  • Computer Cooling Fans

  • Computer Cases

  • PC Game Controllers

  • PC Games

  • Computer Hardware

  • Headphones

  • MP3 Players

  • Stream Video

  • Computer Mouse

  • Monitors

  • Motherboards

  • NAS Storage

  • Networking

  • Laptop Computers

  • DVD Burner

  • Digital Cameras

  • Portable Storage

  • Computer Accessories

  • Smartphone

  • Antivirus Software

  • Sound Cards

  • Speakers

  • Computer Systems

  • Thumb Drives

  • Video Cameras

  • Video Card Reviews

  • Water Cooling

  • Gadgets

  • Keyboards
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • RSS Feeds
  • TechBlips
  • PCHardwareBlips
  • Site Map
  • Customer Service
Future © 2009 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Source URL: http://www.maximumpc.com/article/reviews/qnap_ts209_pro_ii

Links:
[1] http://www.maximumpc.com/user/themurph
[2] http://www.qnap.com
[3] http://www.maximumpc.com/article/reviews/qnap_ts409_pro
[4] http://www.maximumpc.com/article/qnap_ts_109_pro
[5] http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/shiny_gaze_upon_our_matrox_central_axis_nas_unboxing_photos