Hands-On Preview with CrossFireX
Created 2008-02-28 15:22

News
  • Warhammer Online Reaches 750,000 Players in Less Than A Month
  • BlizzCon: StarCraft 2 Campaign Now A Trilogy
  • Small Town Triumphs in Legal Battle, Wins Right to Build Fiber Network
  • Britain: Facebook Slows Down After Frantic Run
  • Russian Firm Breaches WiFi Security Bulwark Using Nvidia Graphics Cards
SEE MORE NEWS
News

Hands-On Preview with CrossFireX

Posted 02/28/08 at 04:22:35 PM |  by Gordon Mah Ung

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponReddit

If you take a double-barreled shotgun and duct tape another double-barreled shot to it, do you get double the performance or do you find your ass planted firmly on the ground with the buckshot scattered? That’s what we wondered when AMD sent us its new Radeon HD 3870X2 running in CrossFireX mode. That’s a total of four GPUs in the system.

For those who don’t know, AMD’s Radeon HD3870X2 is the company’s second generation dual-GPU card. The first, the Rage Fury Maxx, was introduced before the turn of the century. Unlike Nvidia’s GeForce 7950GX2 card which sandwiched two separate PCBs together to form a “single” dual GPU card, the Radeon HD3870X2 features both GPUs on the same PCB. Each GPU features 320 stream processors, a 256-bit memory interface, a unified video decoder and a 512MB of GDDR3 frame buffer for each GPU. The card also supports DirectX 10.1 and Shader 4.1 for future proofing.

For this preview, Alienware supplied its top ALX gaming PC equipped with two Radeon HD 3970X2 cards. Also stuffed into the ALX were: a water-cooled, 3GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 overclocked to 4GHz, 4GB of Patriot DDR3/1800, and an X38-based Asus P5E3 Deluxe motherboard. The cards were each clocked at the stock speeds for the HD 3970X2: 825MHz core and 900MHz memory.

We ran three benchmarks: Call of Duty 4, 3DMark06 and Unreal Tournament 3 for our tests. We initially planned to test using Crysis as well, but ended up chucking it as a benchmark due to sporadic stability problems that we couldn’t explain.

What’s the quick verdict? Benchmark results scaled surprisingly well when we moved from two-GPUs (in a single 3870X2 board) to four GPUs (in a pair of 3870X2s).The caveat, of course, is that you’ll need to play your games at ultra high resolutions to really see the difference. But even at 1920x1200 – the standard resolution of most 24-inch flat panels, you can see a frame rate increase of roughly 20 percent by dropping a second 3870X2 board in your rig. When you step up to a 30-inch panel, the four GPUs in the 3870X2 come into play with roughly a 40 percent increase in frame rate.

That’s not too shabby. It also erases reservations we’ve had about quad GPUs since Nvidia tested its dual-GPU GeForce 7950GX2 cards two years ago. Then, buggy drivers and difficulties getting games to support the high resolutions pretty much destroyed Quad SLI. Lack of Vista drivers didn’t help either. Things have changed for ultra-high resolution gaming now though. With the price of 30-inch panels coming down and 3870X2 boards available for an almost affordable $450 each, we’re genuinely excited about the technology.

However, the 3870X2 won’t be the only quad-GPU game in town for long. Nvidia has its own second-generation Quad SLI in the works. Still, the performance of the 3870X2 in CrossFireX makes us feel a bit more comfortable that at least those two extra GPUs aren’t goldbricking—at least at high resolutions.

There’s still work to be done to improve stability with AMD drivers, which is why this is a preview and not a review. The company also freely admits that the scaling is best under DirectX9. DX10 performance currently to top out at three GPUs, the company says. The company says that that problem is a driver issue that it expects to fix. For now, the ball goes back to Nvidia.

A version of the 3870X2 driver enabling CrossFireX will be publicly available March 5th.

BENCHMARKS
  CrossFireX Single Card Percent difference
3DMark Overall 12x10, DX9 22,890.0 20,094.0 12.2%
3DMark Overall 25x16, DX9 21,050.0 12,889.0 38.8%
3DMark06 HDR1 Canyon Flight 26x16, DX9 52.7 30.0 43.1%
3DMark06 HDR2 Deep Freeze 26x16, DX9 51.3 26.0 49.3%
3DMark06 HDR1 Canyon Flight 19x12, DX9 85.3 43.7 48.8%
3DMark06 HDR2 Deep Freeze 19x12, DX9 79.9 41.0 48.7%
     
Call Of Duty 4 25x16, DX9 93.0 73.0 21.5%
Call Of Duty 4 19x12, DX9 140.0 73.4 47.6%
     
Unreal 3 CTF-OmicronDawn_bot 25x16, DX10 118.0 65.6 44.4%
Unreal 3 CTF-OmicronDawn_bot 19x12, DX10 143.6 105.0 26.9%
Unreal 3 CTF-OmicronDawn_bot 25x16, DX9 120.3 68.5 43.1%
Unreal 3 CTF-OmicronDawn_bot 19x12, DX9 136.0 108.0 20.6%

 

COMMENTS:
5
TAGS: 
news, radeon, hardware, crossfirex, multi gpu, build-a-pc
comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponReddit
COMMENTS
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Technology News

  • Computer Cooling Fans

  • Computer Cases

  • PC Game Controllers

  • PC Games

  • Computer Hardware

  • Headphones

  • MP3 Players

  • Stream Video

  • Computer Mouse

  • Monitors

  • Motherboards

  • NAS Storage

  • Networking

  • Laptop Computers

  • DVD Burner

  • Digital Cameras

  • Portable Storage

  • Computer Accessories

  • Smartphone

  • Antivirus Software

  • Sound Cards

  • Speakers

  • Computer Systems

  • Thumb Drives

  • Video Cameras

  • Video Card Reviews

  • Water Cooling

  • Gadgets

  • Keyboards
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • RSS Feeds
  • Site Map
  • Customer Service
Future © 2008 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Source URL: http://www.maximumpc.com/article/hands_on_preview_with_crossfirex

Links:
[1] http://www.maximumpc.com/user/2674