xbuzzer1 wrote:
Maximumpc reviewers take no money or other things that might influence a review. My girlfriend doesnt agree, she thinks all reviewers take gifts and stuff that influence reviews such as from Norton ect..
The reality is that tech reviewers and tech journalists do get "stuff". It's an issue no doubt. However, for the most part, Mags and tech sites are pretty unbiased. Folks who have been around long enough are pretty immune to influence. May sound hard to believe, but it's true.
I will tell you why.
I reviewed PSU's and software for a while. As a result I acquired PSU's and software and other stuff. These acquisitions are not exactly free, but they do happen - no lie there - I never paid a cent - there are restrictions - but hey, you do get stuff. On many products, it's simply not worth the tracking and red tape to require a return - so the company lets you have it and claims a loss.
Now, a newbie reviewer might be influenced to give a good review just because they are getting "stuff". However, even a piss poor editor will step in and put the foot down.
Also, the makers of really craptastic stuff (or anything really) often have enough money to "pay" for an article, but are not interested in paying for said article unless the site has a noticeable profile (otherwise, why bother?). And, if a site or mag has a noticeable profile, they didn't get there by passing off bribed reviews as genuine. Fanbois aside, folks would notice.
There is also boredom...
OK, so I tested and reviewed PSU's for a year+ and what not. As a result I ended up with a room full of PSUs. I had (and have really) access to any PSU I find I need. So, if a company offers me a review sample of a PSU and makes it clear I can keep it, how is that an influence? If the product sux, I have no reason to tout it - seriously, I have plenty of PSU's. How can getting a crappy product I don't or want or need influence me to give it a good review? It's just going to go on the firkin' stack of equipment to make charity systems with (if it was at least passable). Am I worried that the company that provided it will stop providing hardware for review? A little - only to the point 5that I will stay civil and polite in what I write.
There are sites out there that really are just parking places for companies to pass of ads as reviews - it happens. However, for a print mag you won't see this because the companies can't afford the page fees.
This illusion that print mag folk are paid off is really - - well, it's an illusion.
{Edited 'cuz I ramble}
EDIT: I should say - "I am not under the employ of MaxPC."