Not to mention it's not even valid XHTML:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maximumpc.com%2F
The site has 151 errors! For example, they have the SCRIPT tag after the DTD tag and outside of the HEAD tag! There are other SCRIPT errors, but the one I mentioned is the main one!
I can design a better site then the one they have now, so can all my friends.
MichaelSurf the Web and get PAID
Please Forgive me, But,
I guess 80 errors is better for the site you're are pimpimg - though it is a package jacobean format that a 3rd grader could launch and should have less than 10. I'm not one of your friends, but I'm pretty sure (in fact positive) I could do (and have done) better than that.
That said, maybe you could contribute something more interesting than an error count before you break 10 posts on a forum as a new user.
While I agree there is pleanty of room for improvement around here, it would be better recieved if you became part of the community before you insulted it (which is how it came accross - though I am sure you didn't mean it that way).
In fact, since you know something about judging design, then you know you should also comment on actual changes (other than those of validation), and in a manner that frankly is not so vague (but in fact more constructive) than "pretty sparse".
Other than what you mention about the CD - what else would be an improvement for example? The CD has source information generally right on board. Why bother with tasking the staff again when you have it in your hands?
EDIT - While I sound harsh - its sometimes par for the course with me.
Welcome to the MPC forums. I hope you get more than you give
- End EDIT