Quantcast

Maximum PC

It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 4:32 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: SATA3 vs SATA2 port for SSD?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:06 pm 
Little Foot
Little Foot

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:51 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Union City
Is there any benefit plugging a SATA2 SSD into a SATA3 port? Will plugging it into the SATA3 port give me the maximum SATA2 speed of the drive or will the speed be the same as if I plugged the drive into a SATA2 port?


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SATA3 vs SATA2 port for SSD?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:09 pm 
Team Member Top 10
Team Member Top 10
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 2:55 pm
Posts: 9012
Location: back on the right side of the middle of the left side YES i'm folding
should be no difference at all, the drive cant use all of the bandwidth that is available on sata2 let alone on sata3.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SATA3 vs SATA2 port for SSD?
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:15 am 
8086
8086
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Posts: 27
Location: Newark , DE
Yeah no difference. If a you're in the market for a board there's a lot of deal breaks in terms of specifications and features they support, but SATA 3 just isn't one of them quite yet.


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SATA3 vs SATA2 port for SSD?
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:54 am 
8086
8086

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:29 pm
Posts: 41
if you plug a sata 2 port into a sata 3 port you will probably get no extra speed at all,anyway why do wanna use a sata 2 device with a sata 3 port?


Top
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SATA3 vs SATA2 port for SSD?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:45 am 
Klamath
Klamath

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:56 am
Posts: 284
g.m.waters (red ranger3) wrote:
should be no difference at all, the drive cant use all of the bandwidth that is available on sata2 let alone on sata3.


Maybe mechanical HDDs and older SSDs can't use all the bandwidth of SATA2, but even Indilinx Barefoot-based SSDs are bottlenecked by SATA2 on sequential transfers. Sandforce-based and Crucial SSDs are restricted even further.

Highly parallel SSDs like some FusionIO products or those with onboard RAID-0 like OCZ Revodrives require more bandwidth than even SATA3 can provide, so they're forced to use PCIe or HSDL.

After a quarter century of relative obscurity, SSD technology has exploded in the last five years or so (perhaps the watershed SSD was the first Memoright to surpass HDDs in performance) to the point that most motherboard makers were caught by surprise. They looked upon PCIe as "videocard slots" and you were lucky to get even two.

I ran into my first SSD bottleneck over two years ago when I found my array of four Vertex1 SSDs limited to 650MB/s by the ICH9R southbridge on my Maximus Formula. As a result, last year I sacrificed one of my videocards to free up a PCIe slot for my RevoX2 and this year I chose a Big Bang Marshal with its 8 16xPCIe slots for my new Sandybridge build.

Indeed the OP should see no difference but not because it can't use the bandwidth. It's because it's already bottlenecked by its own SATA2 internally.


Top
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group