
I hate saying "I told you so," but…
No, wait: I love saying I told you so. Last year, in this space, I predicted that not only would the U.S. Supreme Court strike down the California law criminalizing the sale of the violent games to minors, but that it would draw on the United States vs. Stevens decision in doing so. Stevens, you may recall, was a ban on animal snuff films created for sexual fetishists, and the court ruled 8-1 that such films were protected under the First Amendment.
This summer's Supreme Court ruling may have protected the gaming industry's right to free speech, but was it a true "victory"? Read on to get the pros and cons!