When it comes to case design, innovation is a double-edged sword. If a company gets it right, it can win attention and accolades for introducing a fresh and functional approach to an otherwise stale and unchanging market. Let’s face it, a lot of new cases look just like the plain ol’ boxes of yore, with maybe a couple of new fan holes here and there.

But when a company tries too hard, or gets sloppy with the detail work, innovation can quickly turn an otherwise perfectly usable design into a configuration nightmare. We’ve seen this in droves. The thing is, case quality isn’t always something you can eyeball. Sure, that case with the huge, nondescript fan on the crudely windowed side panel might look ugly as sin, but maybe the chassis brings something to the table that you wouldn’t realize unless you built a system in it. Worse yet, what if that case with the awesome features you just picked up isn’t an ideal fit for your system? What if your components don’t fit at all?

This is exactly why the process of case selection can be one of the most important steps you take as a budding rig builder. And it’s why we don’t mess around when we review cases in the Maximum PC Lab. In this roundup, we’re putting new designs from some of the top chassis creators to the ultimate test: We’ll stuff a full, functioning machine into each enclosure, complete with some of the fastest (and hottest) parts a computer can handle. If a case can’t play nicely with an enthusiast setup, it’s not worth your time or money. Because why would you ever want to downgrade from your current enclosure to a more headache-inducing model? Find out which of these models made the grade.

Click on each case name to read the review!

	NZXT Alpha
	Ultra m998
	Cooler Master 690
	Thermaltake Xaser VI (VG4000)
	Gigabyte Mercury Pro

Next: Can your case do this?

COMMENTS:

0

TAGS: 

roundup, hardware, cases, case race, January 2008, features, from the magazine, build a pc

Comments Print Email