Zalman Z-Machine LQ1000
Posted 12/29/08 at 03:30:14 PM by David Murphy

We were apprehensive when we first saw Zalman’s Z-Machine LQ1000 case. From the outside, the chassis looks like a combination of the company’s Fatal1ty FC-ZE1 case (reviewed February 2007) and its Reserator XT external water cooler (reviewed December 2007). But this case isn’t simply a slapped-together hybrid of two products. Zalman packs a number of improvements into the LQ1000.
The LQ1000 abandons the frustrating billion-screw design of its predecessor, the FC-ZE1, for a thumb-screwed side panel. The case’s drive bays use the same tool-free design as the FC-ZE1, but the mounting mechanisms for the case’s four 5.25-inch bays are all tool-free as well.
A monstrous 10x14.25-inch reservoir attaches to the inside of the case’s side panel. It uses 3/8-inch tubing that connects to a 79.25 gallon-per-hour pump attached to the bottom of the chassis. Zalman supplies one of its own water blocks, the ZM-WB5, for your CPU, and it’s compatible with both Intel and AMD systems.
The water-cooling loop’s performance crushes that of a stock cooler and even outpaces that of our top air cooler, Thermaltake’s DuOrb.
However, we dislike the lack of tubing between the pump’s outflow and the water block’s input. It’s an extremely short run that doesn’t leave much room for tube routing. Similarly, the inside of the case is tight. An 8800 GTX videocard brushes up against the hard drive bays.
On the case we received, the connector for the front-panel power button was mislabeled as “HD LED,” and the connection didn’t work. Also, the side panel holding the motherboard tray didn’t line up against the panel covering the drive bays, letting a sliver of light sneak through the case. It’s a minor flaw, but frustrating if you plan to pack the inside of the case with swanky lights.
While this is certainly one of the better water-cooling chassis we’ve tested, it’s not perfect. Zalman has made some improvements to its previous designs, but the LQ1000 could stand a bit more polish.
Powerful water-cooling; great fusion of liquid elements into the chassis.
Design frustrates; no performance difference in cooler’s low and high operations.
| LQ1000 (low) | LQ1000 (high) | Stock Cooler | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idle (C) | 27.7 | 28.5 | 38.5 |
| Premiere Pro CS3 | 47 | 45 | 66.8 |
lol.
Submitted by STorpedo on Sat, 01/03/2009 - 12:07am
I saw this thing from the Review Page, and I just had to comment-this thing looks RIDICULOUS! On the practical side, the fan looks nice, however, A. it's going to have bad airflow, B. only one radiator? cmon.
In one phrase
Submitted by Devo85x on Mon, 12/29/2008 - 3:07pm
Looks cool... performs like crap...
If you pay 800$ for this,
Submitted by s3th on Mon, 12/29/2008 - 7:56pm
If you pay 800$ for this, something is wrong with you LOL
For over $800 retail, I
Submitted by DreadedOne509 on Mon, 12/29/2008 - 1:46pm
For over $800 retail, I would expect the case to be absolutely perfect. Light leaking from poor design or manufacturing, too short to accomodate the current lines of top-end GPU's and 'static' cooling (although very good) is just not acceptable today. Seems that Zalman has realesed an alpha version into the wild.
"Thought's of Dread"
What do you mean static
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 12/30/2008 - 2:20am
What do you mean static cooling? There is a huge ass fan in the side panel. ;)
Look at the test results at
Submitted by DreadedOne509 on Tue, 12/30/2008 - 4:54am
Look at the test results at the bottom of the review, the temp differences
are minimal between low and high settings; I couldn't think of a better way to
state it other than 'static'. A better description would have been poor design
and implementation in the EU controls resulting in below-par performance expectations.
"Thought's of Dread"
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature





