Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Reviews

Zalman CNPS9300 AT

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

We did not expect this. When we first got our hands on Zalman’s CNPS9300 AT, we assumed the company had pulled a “Honey, I Shrunk the CPU Cooler” on its flagship product, the bulky CNPS9700. That’s certainly true if you consider the tale of the tape: The CNPS9300 is 80 percent smaller than its big brother, and its total thermal dissipation area has been nearly halved, from 5,490cm2 to 2,583cm2.

Zalman CNPS9300 AT - click for full!
Zalman is keeping the current black-fan version of the CNPS9300 for now but hasn’t ruled out making an
LED-fan version that matches the CNPS9700’s look.

Logic only dictates that this cooler should perform far worse than the Zalman CNPS9700. But the built-for-silence CNPS9300 AT nearly matches its big brother’s performance—as well as that of our top cooler, Thermaltake’s DuOrb (reviewed July 2008).

Since it eschews the CNPS9700’s fan controller in favor of a four-pin motherboard connection, the CNPS9300 AT’s fan can be controlled through the BIOS or by using a utility such as SpeedFan. We welcome the change, as it’s much easier to adjust the cooler via a software application than by opening your case and turning a knob.

Cranking the CNPS9300 to full throttle elicits a loud whirr, but it allows the device to match the quieter DuOrb degree for degree. Letting the BIOS automatically decide the fan’s speed drops the device’s cooling power by about five degrees; however, it is much quieter when set on auto mode.

 The CNPS9300 still relies on a tiresome and frustrating installation mechanism. The backplane requires motherboard removal, perhaps the least irritating part of the process. The cooler’s mounting bracket barely fits atop the voltage regulators of our EVGA 680i motherboard. And the amount of force we applied to the screws on the CNPS9300’s retention bar to affix it to the mounting bracket had us seriously concerned about the welfare of our processor.

Because of the CNPS9300’s installation shortcomings, the DuOrb remains our reigning cooler of choice, despite its gargantuan size. We love the performance Zalman has achieved with its mini-cooler. Attaching it to our CPU is where we start to sweat.

Zalman CNPS9300 AT
V

Amazing performance for its size; fan adjustable through the BIOS.

Hellboy

The installation process needs to be simplified.

score:8
Benchmarks

CNPS9300 AT (SmartFan)
CNPS9300 AT (100%) Thermaltake DuOrb Stock Cooler
Idle (C) 39.5 32.5 
35.0    46.0
100% Burn (C) 56.0   
51.5
51.0 70.0
Best scores are bolded. Idle temperatures were measured after an hour of inactivity; load temperatures were measured after an hour’s worth of CPU Burn-In (four instances). Test system consists of a stock-clock Q6700 processor on an EVGA 680i motherboard.
COMMENTS
avataroops

oops

Login or register to post comments
avatarNow only if Zalman could

Now only if Zalman could make a GPU fan cooler that didnt take up an additional slot but still gets around the same cooling performance.

Login or register to post comments
avatarWhat about the Thermaltake V1?



Out of curiosity, what happened to the poor ol' Thermaltake
V1, rated by our very own Max PC as the best ever? After a glowing review (and
an immediate purchase by yours truly), the all but abandoned V1 has vanished
into technical obscurity. No zero point benchmarks, no head-to-head
comparisons, nothin'. Alas V1, we hardly knew thee...

Login or register to post comments
avatarIntel's "push pin"

system sucks in my experience. Yeah, it's "easy", but it's also easy to do it badly. After months of my stock cooler not being fully engaged with the CPU because one or more of those silly push pins was just slightly loose (something no amount of twisting and pushing would fix) I gave up and bought a Zalman 9500.

Yeah, the installation requires more work, but when it's on it's f***ing on.

Note to Dave Murphy: it's well known that the capaciters (or whatever the hell those things are) on the bottom of EVGA 680i boards interfere with Zalman's mounting bracket. You need to shave the plastic on the bracket down a bit with a hobby knife to mount it correctly. Blame EVGA.

 

 

 

Login or register to post comments
avatarWhy blame EVGA? If Zalman

Why blame EVGA? If Zalman says that it's cooler will work then they should make the change befor shipping the product. I mean come on the 680i mother board is not a new board it's been out a while and a simple change to the design of the cooler mount would fix this problem. Or at least make a note that this cooler may not work with all motherboards. Perhaps even having cutaway areas on the mounting plate to make it fit different boards. As I said the V1 does not have this problem. It fits any motherboard that an Intel stock cooler fits. So there.

Login or register to post comments
avatarZalman or EVGA??

Who's really at fault here? If the cooler clears and fits other 680i boards, then maybe EVGA didn't build the board to the exact specs, and placed the voltage regulators to close the socket.  If its all 680i boards then I would say that its Zalman.

Login or register to post comments
avatarIt's not too late for them

It's not too late for them to adopt intel's cooler installations system, you know the push pins. I have the ThermalTake V1 and I love it. It's huge but it uses the push pins. It's the only way to go. I simply refuse to even purchase a cooler that does'nt use those push pins. As Mr. T would say I pittie the fool....

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works