Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Reviews

Western Digital Velociraptor

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

We’ve seen this day coming for a long time. There was no way that Western Digital was going to sit back and let other manufacturers usurp the Raptor’s place at the top of the storage speed charts. Consider the rule of the speedy terabyte drives a hiccup on the timeline. The Raptor is back: upgraded, renamed, and… physically smaller.

Western Digital Velociraptor
Don't try to pull the drive off its IcePack and install it in your notebook. The Velociraptor's power requirements will prevent it from running.

To maximize the Velociraptor’s speeds, Western Digital has shrunk the size of the hard drive to 2.5 inches. This seems counterintuitive, given that Samsung has been able to achieve a tremendous combination of speed and storage with its 3.5-inch drives. Western Digital’s smaller form allows the Velociraptor to consume less power than its 3.5-inch counterparts, and the drive heads don’t have to travel as far to reach the data. The downside is that these smaller platters will always trail in data/platter.

But consumers and OEM manufacturers buy Raptor drives for a single reason—and it isn’t storage capacity. Given the Velociraptor’s read and write speeds, its 300GB capacity is actually a bonus. The Velociraptor is twice as spacious as its Raptor predecessor and significantly faster.

We can safely crown the Velociraptor the fastest consumer-grade hard drive on the market. Its two 150GB platters spin at 10,000rpm, creating an 18 percent improvement in our PCMark test over Samsung’s HD103UJ terabyte drive. In our synthetic HD Tach benchmark, the Velociraptor beat out the HD103UJ’s read times by 11.6MB/s. The difference shot up to 15.6MB/s when comparing the drives’ write speeds.

This Velociraptor is Western Digital’s second iteration in the line, coming a scant few months after the initial launch of the product. Why the refresh? The first version of the hard drive centered the drive atop the device’s IcePack mounting frame, rendering the drive impossible to use in a hotswap interface. Reps at Western Digital have told us that this first line of Velociraptor drives is scheduled for extinction. The company will phase out these drives in favor of the revision B units unless consumers clamor for the original build—an unlikely scenario.

If you want the fastest consumer-grade hard drive on the market, the Velociraptor is it, with twice the capacity of its Raptor predecessor and a 59 percent speed advantage. If we could ding Western Digital for shafting early adopters with the hotswap issue, we would. But the company’s speedy fix has ensured our praise. You might be able to find a drive with a better price-per-gigabyte ratio, but certainly not one that’s faster.

Western Digital Velociraptor
Sharptooth

The fastest consumer-grade hard drive you can purchase, save for SSDs.

Littlefoot

Warranty voided if you separate the drive from the IcePack.

score:9ka
Benchmarks

WD Velociraptor WD Raptor
Samsung HD103UJ
Size
300GB 150GB 1TB
HDTach Burst (MB/s)
249.7       
117.6 204.5
HDTach Random Access (ms) 7.1 8.1 13.7
HDTach Average Read (MB/s) 108.4 65.0
96.8
HDTach Average Write (MB/s) 100.0 63.0 84.4
PCMark05 Overall 9,450      
5,956
8,014
Best scores are bolded. HD Tach version 3.0.1.0 used.
COMMENTS
avatarjust wondering

the raptor is a beast; no doubt about that. But, I would love to see maximumpc do a review of seagate's 300gb 15k.5 cheetah. with an access time of 3.5ms and a host transfer rate of 300 MBytes/sec from what I've seen, it sure impressed the hell out of me on paper. I'm interested in what difference the raptor's smaller 2.5" size accounts for, and what the reliability is like on a 15k rpm disk.jimmy

Login or register to post comments
avatarExcept it's about 280GB

I feel cheated every time I buy a hard drive, even knowing that manufacturers will say that 1000k is a megabyte, while windows sees 1024k as mb.

Login or register to post comments
avatarummm actually that isn't the

ummm actually that isn't the reason why the read/write portion is smaller than the actually capacity.

Login or register to post comments
avatarPrice/performance

Granted, it is a little silly to bring up price/performance regarding a bleeding edge device like this. But, my 500gb Seagate 7200.11 gets avgerage read speeds 94-95MB/s and burst speed of 220-245 MB/s with HD Tach.  Is that extra speed really worth the extra $200?  Sure the seek times are better, 7 or 8ms compared to 11 or 12ms, but how noticable is that difference? Maybe for things like the delay when you right click to bring up a context menu, but for OS load time and game loads does it matter?

 

Also, what is the noise like?  I dropped my Raptor 150GB  a few weeks after I got it because of seek noise.  Does the smaller form factor improve on that?

Login or register to post comments
avatarLusting...

This drive is pretty sexy I have to admit.  I am still running the original 36gb Raptor (ouch) and my urge to upgrade to this rediculiously fast piece of tech is going to get me in trouble with the wife.  Oh, and someone must be watching movies with their kids, Land Before Time pro/con reference?

Login or register to post comments
avatarColbert and I do enjoy our

Colbert and I do enjoy our dinosaur movies.

Login or register to post comments
avatarHow much time does it save

does anyone have a real world benchmark, like antivirus difference in scan time versus an older drive?

Login or register to post comments
avatarHere's a sneak peek from

Here's a sneak peek from our November issue:

It took us 383 seconds to create a 40GB uncompressed AVI file from Adobe Premiere Pro to a Velociraptor drive.  The same benchmark... wouldn't run on our terabyte drive of choice, Samsung's HD103UJ.  And no SSD we've tested has been able to beat this mark.

We initially tried this test on a Western Digital terabyte drive and it took far longer than the VR.  I'll try and dredge up the concrete numbers for you!

Login or register to post comments
avatarRemoving the heat sink should not be a con

IF anything capacity should be the only CON.

Login or register to post comments
avatarYou should make that a con

You should make that a con for everything. For example:

 

Graphics card warranty voided if you run it without the cooler

CPU warranty voided if you remove the heat spreader

Motherboard warranty voided if you pull off all the heatsinks

Login or register to post comments
avatarwhy is it a negative in the

why is it a negative in the review if you pull the icepack off?

Login or register to post comments
avatarto clarify this why is it in

to clarify this why is it in the review. it wont fit into a laptop or a drive bay if you take it off its obvious its  a good idea not to and not really a con this drive should get a ten

Login or register to post comments
avatarIce Pack

 You know that someday they will make them w/o the ice pack...when laptops can handle them.

Just leave the damn thing alone for now. Don't void a 5 year warranty.

 Asus M2A-VM,, Raptor 150,Caviar 200,,AMD 5600+, 2GB Patriot PC2-6400, Gigabyte 8600GT 512, CM Extreme 500W, Antec 300 case

Login or register to post comments
This Month's Issue
FEATURE Build a Crazy-Fast $647 PCFEATURE Six Single-Band 802.11n Routers ReviewedHOW TOTweak BitTorrent and FirefoxFEATUREClose Look at ClarkdaleWHITE PAPERLCD Panel Technology