Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB
Posted 10/22/09 at 10:30:00 PM by Nathan Edwards
Comments
Print
Email
Faster than a VelociRaptor, and six times the capacity
After months of making do with 5,400rpm and 5,900rpm 2TB drives and odd-bird 1.5TB drives, it’s finally happening: 7,200rpm two-terabyte hard drives are coming to rigs near you. First out of the gate and into our greedy arms is Western Digital’s 2TB Caviar Black, the performance cousin to the 2TB Caviar Green we reviewed in May. And brother, it’s just what we’ve been waiting for.
The 2TB Caviar Black is spec’d to impress, with four 500GB platters, two processors, 64MB of cache, and a dual-stage actuator system that puts a fine-tuned piezoelectric actuator head at the end of the standard magnetic actuator, enabling fine-tuned tracking for speedy seek times. The Caviar Black also comes with WD’s standard No-Touch ramp loader, so the read/write head never comes in contact with the platters, increasing the drive’s lifespan.
If this is the shape of 7,200rpm drives to come, we're wetting ourselves with excitement.
All these little extras add up, and the 2TB Caviar Black offers the speediest sustained reads and writes—exceeding 112MB/s each—of any consumer magnetic hard drive we’ve ever tested. That’s 15 percent faster than the Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB’s read speeds. The 1.5TB Barracuda, previously our high-capacity speed champion, couldn’t keep up in sustained writes, either—here the Caviar was nearly 30 percent faster. And thanks to the greater areal density of the Caviar drive, its random-access read and write times are just 7.6ms and 5.0ms, respectively. You won’t find faster seeks short of a VelociRaptor or solid state drive. Of course, solid state drives offer the best performance—the $370 Patriot Torqx, our Best of the Best SSD, achieves sustained reads of over 200MB/s, sustained writes of over 175MB/s, and seek times measured in the tenths of milliseconds.
The 2TB Caviar Black has an MSRP of $300, the same price that low-powered 2TB drives like the Caviar Green and Barracuda LP debuted at earlier this year. Street prices, of course, will be lower, and keep falling—the first waves of 2TB drives, the “green” ones, are already selling for as low as $200. And the Caviar Black’s sustained reads and writes trump the fastest of those green drives by 20MB/s.
The 1.5TB Barracuda held a spot on our Best of the Best list for more than a year, but now it’s been firmly supplanted—the 2TB Caviar Black is officially our favorite hard drive.
Expect 7,200rpm 2TB drives from Hitachi, Seagate, and others in the next few months as well, with the aim of high performance. But if you buy a capacity hard drive today, next week, or even half a year from now, you can’t go wrong with this Caviar Black. It has the fastest sustained read and write speeds of any consumer magnetic hard drive we’ve ever tested. It’s faster in any benchmark than all standard hard drives save the WD VelociRaptor, which still holds the edge in burst speeds and random-access times—barely. Think about that for a second: You can get VelociRaptor-busting speed and six-and-a-half times the capacity for $300. We’re sold.
Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB
Lennon
Stupid-fast; heaps of cache; dual-action actuator arm.
Lenin
Random-access writes; burst speeds still slightly slower than VelociRaptor.
Benchmarks
| WD Caviar Black 2TB | Seagate Barracuda 72.00.11 1.5TB | WD VelociRaptor 300GB | Patriot Torqx 128GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h2benchw Average Sustained Transfer Rate Read (MB/s) | 112.3 | 98.2 | 98.31 | 205.4 |
| h2benchw Average Sustained Transfer Rate Write (MB/s) | 112.2 | 85.7 | 98.22 | 175.1 |
| h2benchw Random Access Read (ms) | 7.6 | 12.5 | 7.24 | 0.11 |
| h2benchw Random Access Write (ms) | 5.0 | 5.3 | 3.42 | 0.31 |
| HDTach Burst Read (MB/s) | 213.7 | 209.3 | 249.7 | 163.0 |
| PCMark Vantage Overall Score | 6,452 | 5,241 | 6,082 | 21,247 |
Best scores are bolded. All drives were tested on our standard test bed using a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700, EVGA 680i SLI board. HDTach 3.0.1.0, h2benchw, and Premiere Pro CS3 scores were obtained in Windows XP; PCMark Vantage 2005 scores were obtained in Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit.
Benchmarks
Submitted by maolin34 on Sun, 11/08/2009 - 5:58am
The benchmark scores don't seem to add up here.
In the October issue, the Seagate Barracuda LP 2TB had benchmark speeds that match those listed in the November issue for the Patriot Torx 128GB SSD. Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB has benchmark scores that are lower than the WD Caviar Green 2TB in the October issue comparison.
Patriot Torx 128GB October Issue (205.4, 175.1, 0.11, 0.31, 674, and 21,247)
WD Caviar Green 2TB October Issue (175.1, 150.1, 0.16, 0.12, 945, 14,088)
WD Caviar Black 2TB November Issue (112.3, 112.2, 7.6, 5.0, 213.7, 6,452)
Whats's the point of the benchmarks if they are wrong? Not to mention that no one caught this mistake?
Can any of you imagine a 2TB HDD with sustained transfers of 205 and 175?
9 Kick Ass
Submitted by EthicSlave on Sun, 10/25/2009 - 5:04am
Consider the following when you wonder why this drive does not have a 10.
1. The original 150gb velociraptor only achieved a 9 kick ass rating.
2. The unrevised 300gb velociraptor only achieved a 8 without a kick ass rating.
3. 10 is usualy reserved for the best of the best, so in theory, had it beaten out the velociraptor in random access times it would probably have attained a 10 perfect score the key word here is PERFECT.
keep up the good work guys... JACob
Submitted by domih2009 on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 8:53am
NewEgg sells the enterprise/raid RE4-GP version there WD2002FYPS there http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136365
But the WD2003FYPS is not on their catalog yet.
The regular black caviar is there: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136456&cm_re=WD2001FASS-_-22-136-456-_-Product but is deactived.
It would be nice if the article mentioned which one they are talking about (Caviar Black $ or RE4-GP $+ or RE4 $++ ?)
According to the picture, the WD2001FASS?
Thanks for the info.. it
Submitted by Khaled on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 10:55am
Thanks for the info..
it appears that this will take a while to be available on newegg, so I will just install W7 on a regular drive for now (what's a good cloner app for later?)
Submitted by domih2009 on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 12:35pm
I don't know. If I have to clone drives (same size) I simply use "dd" (UNIX). Otherwise, I install from scratch. Otherwise, MPC likes http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm is I correcly recollect.
Submitted by domih2009 on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 9:00am
If you want only one for a desktop or a single-drive NAS go with the WD2001FASS. If you want several for RAID go with the WD2003FYPS whose MSRP has not been published by WD yet.
<<...
Additional Features for WD RE4 2 TB Enterprise Hard Drives
WD RE4 drives feature 1.2 million hours MTBF, Active Power Save™,
enhanced RAFF™ technology, multi-axis shock sensor, native command
queuing (NCQ), pressure sensors, third generation dynamic fly height,
time limited error recovery (TLER), and an extensive and enhanced
testing process to ensure long-term reliability for demanding
enterprise applications.Price and Availability
The WD Caviar Black 2 TB GB (model WD2001FASS) hard drives are
available through select distributors and resellers. Manufacturer's
Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for the WD Caviar Black 2 TB drive is
$299 USD. The WD RE4 2 TB (model WD2003FYYS) drive is currently being
qualified by OEMs. Both drives are covered by a five-year limited
warranty. More information about WD Caviar Black 2 TB desktop hard
drives may be found on the company's Web site at http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=733 and the WD RE4 2 TB enterprise hard drives at http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=732....>>
http://www.wdc.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release=18b8d283-2393-4d8d-90dd-a11f2f8ebcf1
Submitted by Khaled on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 7:16am
who is selling this online? I can't find it on newegg or Amazon
with 7,200 drives meeting
Submitted by nekollx on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 12:52pm
with 7,200 drives meeting the speed of raptors isn't it about time for WD to revise the "speed king"?
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
when will it end
Submitted by mps725 on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 6:56am
A new harddrive with another .5 terabytes is released every week, at some point it has to be considered unprofound that a company releases a new one. The very fact of the matter is they could probably make HD's with 20 terabytes and 10k+ RPM but they don't because incremental speed/capacity increases net more money because of yokals who buy these things everytime they come out for the extra .5 TB space.
Of course I am speaking without facts, maybe they really do labor over getting that extra .5 TB into the drive EVERYTIME a new one is released. Maybe they throw a huge party at the company,WE GOT ANOTHER .5TB INTO OUR DRIVE, PARTY AT 7.
It all seems reminiscent of how how Iraq has better Cell technology than America because the decision to improve networks wasn't made by a coorporation (Profit driven) but rather a military tyrant (Death to america driven)
A Union of Speed and Capacity
Submitted by the_river on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 6:19am
I saw this advertised on Newegg yesterday, and I jumped over here to see what was the current favorite drive in Best of the Best...and it was the same. I didn't see the review yet but you were fast to get it out.
I currently have a Raptor (love the speed!) but the 67GB of converted movies (I'm not even half done with my DVD collection) is drying my drive up. I wanted performance AND capacity especially since most of my movies are around 2GB a peice and I load games like Unreal 3 and L4D. My DSL connection is my PING downfall, but I'm still the first one on the map 98% of the time.
Being bound to the SATA I spec isn't easy with a SATA II mobo, though most of the time the pipeline is enough for what I do but I didn't want to go backwards in speed. I also wanted it as my primary drive, not a secondary like my 250GB WD for video editing. Thanks Max PC for the great review. I'll wait a couple of months and buy it when it drops down to around $200. I'll install my full copy of Windows 7 then since the RC is still good.
Appreciate the excellent review.
Submitted by NVaZN on Sat, 10/24/2009 - 9:56am
I currently have a VelociRaptor as my OS drive and a 1TB Black Edition as storage drive.
NVaZN
Wait....
Submitted by CTskifreak on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 7:55am
Why are you storing everything on the Raptor? Geez man, go get a 1 TB drive for $85 bucks and drop that in. Move your movies and other files you don't need on to it. You'll thank me later. The 1 TB's will be much faster than the 250, and you don't need those on your Raptor.
Submitted by the_river on Tue, 10/27/2009 - 11:29am
Since the Libraries in Windows 7 are tied into the User folder, it's easier to have the applications know to look into C:\Users\<USER>\Videos. The 250GB drive is used for video editing and compiling Blu-ray movie discs. Takes a lot of room to grab data off a high def camera, compile, and then burn it to a Blu-ray disc. Even my SD projects can be upwards of 100GB, so I need just a 'temp' work drive for it. Then I Acronis the folders and compress them to an external backup drives (one I'm working with is 1TB).
I plan on upgrading all my drives eventually. I have a Antec NINE Hundred case, so I'm not hurting for room. I'll probably get the 2TB WD as the primary with all my content loaded on it (movies, games, apps etc) and then another two 1TB drives for editing and backup purposes. Just need to start somewhere.
By the way, the file types are M4V files opening up in Media Player 12 64-bit, so the super low latency of the Raptor is seen. The 20GB AVI files I output for editing, it's more about memory than read speeds. A standard 1TB with 32MB Cache would suffice.
Thanks for the tip.
this got a 9 for having
Submitted by bikerbub on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 3:50am
this got a 9 for having "slower than velociraptor" random writes and burst speeds?? don't think a 2Tb drive should be held to the same standards. maybe thats the label's fault.
hey, at least they didn't call it "Extreme".
Submitted by aldude505 on Fri, 10/23/2009 - 8:34am
I had to scroll down a while but I finally found someone who had the same thought run through their head, its a 2 TB 7200 rpm drive, whats not to love? Other than the fact that it can't beat a Velociraptor random writes... Really? I'll take the extra 1.5 TB of storage for the couple milliseconds I have to wait for it to find that long lost piece of Scrubs Season 1.
Also love the comment about how they didn't call it Extreme, made me chuckle
Must Read Articles
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature
Most Popular Articles
This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works
Technology News
Computer Cooling Fans
Computer Cases
PC Game Controllers
PC Games
Computer Hardware
Headphones
MP3 Players
Stream Video
Computer Mouse
Monitors
Motherboards
NAS Storage
Networking
Laptop Computers
DVD Burner
Digital Cameras
Portable Storage
Computer Accessories
Smartphone
Antivirus Software
Sound Cards
Speakers
Computer Systems
Thumb Drives
Video Cameras
Video Card Reviews
Water Cooling
Gadgets
- Keyboards
© 2009 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.