Samsung SH-S223
Posted 03/26/09 at 01:02:41 AM by Katherine Stevenson

We’ll admit we’ve been perfectly content with Samsung’s SH-S203 DVD burner for more than a year. Once we were writing 4.38GB of data to a disc in five minutes flat, we were feeling pretty satisfied with the state of DVD technology. Nevertheless, we’re not about to turn our nose up at a performance increase. And that’s what Samsung’s latest DVD burner, the SH-S223, offers.
As you might have guessed from the name, the SH-S223 represents a jump from 20x to 22x DVD+/-R burn speeds. In our tests, this effectively shaved 12 seconds off the time it took to fill a single-layer DVD+R disc. The SH-S223 took 4:46 (min:sec) compared with the SH-S203’s flat 5:00. In both cases, we used 16x media, the fastest-rated media that’s readily available. And in both cases, the drives’ “over-speed” feature enabled them to burn data at higher than rated speeds. In the course of its write, the SH-S223 steadily climbed from a starting speed of 8.38x to 20.7x.
Besides the boost in DVD+/-R speeds, however, the SH-S223 has identical speed ratings to its predecessor for all other types of media. In our DVD+R DL write test, the SH-S223’s 16x rating for that media amounted to a write time of 13:13 using 8x media, a mere three seconds slower than the SH-S203. Again, the SH-S223’s over-speed feature kicked in, with a good portion of the burn occurring at 10x speed.
The SH-S223 is rated at 8x for DVD+RW and 6x for DVD-RW. We tested the drive with DVD-RW media rated at 4x. This time, rather than burning beyond the disc’s speed rating, the SH-S223 stuck to it, maintaining a 4x speed throughout and writing 4.38GB to the rewriteable disc in 14:56. This isn’t all that surprising, as drives typically perform much more conservatively with rewriteable media, given its greater propensity for write errors.
Like the SH-S203 before it, the SH-S223 connects to a PC using a SATA interface and comes bundled with a host of Nero apps.
While we see no need to graduate from a 20x DVD burner—particularly the SH-S203—to the SH-S223, this is the drive to get if you’re currently using anything less than an 18x model.
All the goodness of the SH-S203, plus faster DVD+/- writes.
We’d have preferred speed improvements across the board.
| Samsung SH-S223 | Samsung SH-S203 | |
|---|---|---|
| DVD+R Write Speed Average | 14.94x | 13.45x |
| DVD+R Read Speed Average | 12.16x | 12.13x |
| Access Times (random/full) | 117/204ms | 116/198ms |
| DVD+DL Write Speed Average | 9.12x | 9x |
Best scores are bolded. All tests were conducted using Nero CD DVD Speed and Verbatim media. Our test bed is a Windows XP SP2 machine using a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700, 2GB of Corsair DDR2/800 RAM on an EVGA 680 SLI motherboard, one EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS card, a Western Digital 500GB Caviar hard drive, and a PC Power and Cooling Turbo Cool PSU.
They are both SATA, for the
Submitted by Founck on Tue, 03/31/2009 - 9:20pm
They are both SATA, for the extra dollar you get lightscribe support.
my bad, your right. I said
Submitted by gatorXXX on Wed, 04/01/2009 - 12:57am
my bad, your right. I said one was pata and the other sata.
Er?
Submitted by Thiazolium on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 9:00am
Isn't 12.16 > 12.13???
Which One?
Submitted by Caramoore on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 12:08am
NewEgg shows both the SH-S233F and SH-S233Q so which one are we talking about here? Is the S233Q worth the extra Dollar? What's the differents?
one is sata and the other
Submitted by gatorXXX on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 11:18am
one is sata and the other pata.
Yeah, a DVD in 5 Minutes?
Submitted by DMI PC Repair on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 3:22am
Yeah, a DVD in 5 Minutes? Tell them to update the firmware to get to that point. That would be some useful info don't ya think.
Xcore don't mean X processors dang it!!!
I have used 3 different
Submitted by gatorXXX on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 10:30am
I have used 3 different brands of DVD's and I think the fastest I have burned one (about 4.3 gigs) was about 5:20. Most of the time it's about 5:45ish. Although when you burn mis-matched material, I.E. jpegs, video, and mp3's together, it takes longer to burn. So I try to stick to one file type if I can help it.
I've had this drive for
Submitted by gatorXXX on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 12:53am
I've had this drive for months. Bought it from Newegg in fact. Good drive and can't really complain.
some math issues
Submitted by -it- on Wed, 03/25/2009 - 7:21pm
this may sound picky, but isnt 5minutes minus 12 seconds 4 min 48 secs?
SHHHHH! It's a secret!
Submitted by gatorXXX on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 12:07am
SHHHHH! It's a secret!
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature





