Samsung P2770HD Review
Strong on features, weak on performance
We had high hopes for Samsung’s P2770HD. After all, its 23-inch little brother rose to the top of a sea of crappy TN displays in our December 2009 roundup. With its street price of $400, the P2770HD looked like a strong value for folks with non-critical applications.
We stand by our opinion that twisted-nematic (TN) technology is inferior to in-plane switching (IPS), as well as our recommendation that you shouldn’t rely on a TN-panel monitor for critical applications such as photo and video editing (especially if your livelihood depends on it). On the other hand, TN panels like this one do deliver unarguably faster pixel response rates, which is great for gaming, and lately, they’ve become insanely cheap.

The Samsung P2770HD is a 6-bit TN panel, but Samsung maintains that its proprietary Hi-FRC frame-rate control enables it to display 16.7 million colors just like an 8-bit IPS model.
This Samsung model also includes an integrated HDTV tuner, built-in stereo speakers, a Dolby Digital decoder, and nearly all the A/V inputs you could want, albeit only one each of HDMI, DVI, and S/PDIF on the digital side, and VGA, composite, and component on the analog side. As we found with the P2370HD, each of the P2770HD’s ports are set at right angles to the rear panel, which makes for easy connections—we’re really tired of turning monitors upside down to plug in cables. Unfortunately, the panel is mounted atop an egregiously flimsy stand that’s not up to the task of holding it at a 90-degree angle without flopping forward.
Samsung doesn’t show any love for DisplayPort, and the bezel—while attractive—is too wide to consider using in a side-by-side multi-display configuration. There’s no integrated USB hub or media-card reader, either. But since this is a TV as well as a monitor, the P2270HD comes with an infrared remote control, which makes adjusting its brightness, contrast, and other controls supremely easy—this is a far superior solution to mashing buttons on the bezel.
As is our wont, we used DisplayMate Multimedia with Test Photos (www.displaymate.com) to evaluate the display, and the first flaw we detected was an inability to render colors uniformly over the entire monitor. While displaying low-saturated colors (bright shades of gray and very light cyan, for instance) an arc of darkness drooped from the top edge of the panel. We encountered a similar problem while rendering DisplayMate’s 256-step grayscale screens (despite the name, this test also displays red, blue, green, cyan, and yellow scales, not just gray). No matter which scale we were viewing and no matter which direction the scales progressed (right to left, top to bottom, etc.), the same arc of darkness bowed out from the edge toward the center of the screen. We also encountered problems at the high end of the grayscale, where very light shades of gray blew out to white.
We didn’t notice this shortcoming while playing games or watching movies, because there are few occasions in those scenarios where one color remains static across broad stretches of the display’s borders. It could be a serious problem, however, if you’re trying to match colors while painstakingly editing a photograph. And while we’ve yet to find any TN panel that we could recommend for that type of work, this monitor’s 23-inch cousin performed far better.
Samsung P2770HD

Weebles
Integrated HDTV tuner; plethora of digital and analog inputs; remote control.
Weevils
Mediocre color uniformity; poor gray-scale performance; feeble stand.
6
| Viewable Area | 27 inches |
| Native Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| Panel Type | TN |
| Color Gamut | 80 percent of NTSC |
| Color Depth | 6-bit with Hi-FRC |
| Gray-to-Gray Response Time | 2ms |
| Inputs | DVI, HDMI, VGA, composite, component |
Comments
![]()
Baer
June 10, 2010 at 1:26pm
Things I do not like about this monitor
1. low res 1920 X 1080. For this size monitor it should be at least 1920 X 1200
2. Built in TV tuner and speakers, this apears to be just a 1080p TV with a monitor input
3. Thick Bezel not great for multi monitor set up
4. No Dp input also not great for multi monitor (3 or more)
5. I will bet it has one of those awful glossy reflective screens
I will pass.
![]()
Mr_Imortall
June 22, 2010 at 12:19am
Agree with you there . Iam looking for atleast a 24 inch ..Could someone point me into a direction 24 -30
![]()
Keith E. Whisman
June 10, 2010 at 9:17pm
Ha ha ha ha... LOL... No Dp input.. LOL. LOL LOL LOL... You mean that this monitor cannot handle double penetration?
![]()
Monstrosity
June 10, 2010 at 11:01am
i had a 2433bw which wasnt bad for the price. 1920x1200/24 inch. It recently broke and was not coverd by a warranty though, and i have had a hard time finding something thats better (within that pricerange) with the 16:10 aspect ratio. Ill probably just end up buying another one of those and pray that it doesnt crap out on me.
dammit was supposed to be a reply oh well
![]()
Magius
June 10, 2010 at 7:18am
I find it difficult to stomach that after all these years we are still having to live with thick bezels, the usual problems with color uniformity and light bleeding.
Are these issues so expensive to fix/prevent before the monitor leaves the factory?
![]()
violian
June 10, 2010 at 10:51am
I had a fairly new Samsung 22" monitor (2007 model), and the bezel cracked after leaving it in the basement in the winter (room temp usually around 65 degrees F). I decided to bring it upstairs in the Spring, and voila, 2 1inch cracks. Must've been the dry air or something.
![]()
Monstrosity
June 10, 2010 at 6:48am
I'm stating to get annoyed with all of the 16:9 monitors flooding the market. It seems like everyone forgot about 1920x1200
![]()
Baer
June 10, 2010 at 1:28pm
I totally agree with you, the 1080p may be high res for a TV but for a computer monitor is it inferior. I also hate the glossy reflective screens. They are just dumed down TV's
![]()
SEALBoy
June 10, 2010 at 9:04am
It is a bit annoying, but it's also about 50% cheaper, so my complaints are muted. Personally, I would go for 2048x1152 if I could find it; it's 16:9, but wider than 1920x1200 and almost as tall. They also don't cost significantly more than 1920x1080 panels.
More relating to the review: 27" panel using the same resolution as 23" panels = meh.
![]()
Silver925
June 10, 2010 at 9:58am
I found that as much as I want to use 1920x1200 (I refuse to give up my 1200 vertical pixels that I grew so accustomed with a 1600x1200 CRT) the price for LCD's with that resolution seem out-of-line.
I'm seeing that it's getting harder to find, but I've been using a Samsung 2343BWX and have been very satisfied. It's very stripped down (it's one major flaw is the lack of an HDMI input) but the price reflects that. Bang-for-buck, it's a very good 2048x1152 monitor for a casual user or PC gamer.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















