OWC Mercury Pro 8x Blu-ray External
Posted 08/18/09 at 01:37:18 PM by Katherine Stevenson
Blu-ray has enough troubles without products like this
On the surface, OWC’s Mercury Pro Blu-ray external drive could seem appealing. The cabinet is attractive and sturdy; it offers FireWire 400, FireWire 800, USB 2.0, and eSATA interfaces—including all the requisite cables; and it holds a Pioneer BDR-203 drive, which is rated at 8x for BD-R writes—the highest rating available—and 16x for DVD+/-R. Yet, after using the device, we’re unimpressed.
We first tried to test the drive with the eSATA interface but it failed to work with any of our test beds, which use the nForce 680i SLI chipset. It was recognized by motherboards using Intel’s P45 and X58 chipsets as well as those boards’ auxiliary Marvell controllers. However, we benchmarked using USB 2.0 on our standard test bed for continuity.

Standard DVD testing went well, with the OWC Mercury Pro writing 4.38GB of data to a single-layer disc in 6:15 (min:sec)—a decent time, but not as good as LG’s GBW-H20L, which took 5:43. On a brighter note, the Mercury Pro was able to rip a dual-layer DVD movie to the hard drive in 10:49 (min:sec)—a time that rivals the best standard DVD drives and far outstrips the Blu-ray drives we’ve tested (the GBW-H20L took almost twice as long, for example).
But problems arose again when we moved to our Blu-ray tests. We simply could not write data to either BD or BD-RE media when using Nero DiscSpeed—the app we use for all our optical drive tests. Whether we used Verbatim, TDK, Memorex, or Panasonic media, we were met with an error message almost instantly. Tech support at OWC said they were able to use the app with no problem, but that wasn’t our experience. Since the version of the Mercury Pro we reviewed doesn’t come with software, we used the latest version of Nero 8 to test the drive’s Blu-ray skills. Like we said, the Pioneer drive inside the unit is rated for 8x BD-R writes—yet it took 52:17 (min:sec) to write 22.5GB of data to disc. Compare that with the 6x-rated LG GBW-H20L’s time of 22:16. A second test produced a similar result (52:26). Oddly, the drive performed more predictably when writing to BD-RE, taking 45:19 to fill a rewriteable disc, compared with the LG drive’s 39:35 (both drives are rated at 2x for BD-RE media).
We’re not sure what to make of this mish-mash of issues; we just know that $400 is a lot to spend on a really good drive—we wouldn’t even consider spending a fraction of that on this product.
Attractive; includes cables for all the ports; excellent DVD rips.
OWC doesn't seem to care as much about QA as it does about product design.
| OWC Mercury | LG GBW-H20L | |
|---|---|---|
| DVD Write Speed Average | 11.52x | 12.07x |
| DVD Read Speed Average | 11.96x | 9.10x |
| Access Times (random/full) | 169/357ms | 100/175ms |
| DVD Ripping | 10:49 | 15:19 |
| Time to burn 22.5GB to BD-R (min:sec) | 52:17* | 22:16 |
| Time to burn 22.5GB to BD-RE (min:sec) | 45:19* | 39:35 |
More Investigation Was Needed.
Submitted by OWCGrant on Wed, 08/19/2009 - 9:42am
It is unfortunate you experienced issues testing the OWC Mercury Pro Blu-ray External Drive. We haven't been able to duplicate the same issues. Other media sources (Digitial Video Editing, PC Gamer, MyMac.com) have used it successfully and rated it very highly. We still maintain several variables present in your test set up (older versions of software, conflicts with anti-virus program (which you refused to disable), chipset conflicts) possibly contributed to your experience. The OWC brand name has a two decade reputation for high quality/high performance products. Suggesting anything contrary to that without further exploration of the unit on your end and resolving any testing issues is a disservice to readers.
yeah, I would like to see a
Submitted by Khaled on Mon, 08/31/2009 - 5:39pm
yeah, I would like to see a re-review :]
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






