Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Reviews

Nvidia GeForce 3D Vision

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Explore the third dimension—without the use of hallucinogens

Finally, here’s a 3D gaming solution that doesn’t send us headfirst into a vomit bag. GeForce 3D Vision is Nvidia’s attempt to revive stereoscopic 3D, a century-old technology that has never been implemented successfully in PC gaming (despite many headache-inducing efforts in the late ’90s). Along with wireless shutter glasses and an IR emitter, this $200 kit comes with the promise that you’ll be able to enhance your existing library of DirectX games by turning them into true 3D experiences—if you’re running a GeForce 8800 GT or better videocard. And for the most part, the promise is delivered —but not without some serious issues.


After a surprisingly painless installation—you just need to plug the IR emitter into a USB port and install drivers—we
loaded up several of our favorite games from the past year. Nvidia tests and certifies games to work with the 3D Vision—about 400 games have been approved and given ratings ranging from “Fair” to “Excellent” as of early February.
 
The 3D effect on the higher-rated games was stunning, transforming our monitor from a flat display to a window that let us peer into our games’ worlds. This illusion was particularly impressive with first-person shooters—Left 4 Dead’s zombies looked as if they were really clawing at our faces, and we felt like we were actually running through the towering cityscape of Mirror’s Edge. Depth-of-field blurring effects, like Call of Duty’s iron-sights and Far Cry 2’s layered fields of grass, also benefitted greatly. And thankfully, none of our testers experienced the nausea that was typical of previous shutter glasses, even after extended play sessions—this was due to our use of a 120Hz monitor, a requirement of the goggles. The only complaints testers had were that they felt a slight cross-eyed sensation and increased eyestrain during use.

But even in games with an “Excellent” rating, the implementation is far from perfect. Self-shadowing and motion blur produced visual artifacts, and post-processed lighting effects didn’t render correctly with stereoscopy enabled. Many games’ crosshairs also needed to be replaced by Nvidia’s reticule overlay, which omits some features of native in-game HUDs. The simulated depth goes into the screen by default; rendered objects don’t actually fly out toward you unless developers have specifically coded the effect into the game (World of Warcraft is the only game so far that supports this feature).

But our biggest problem with 3D Vision is the cost of the experience. The $200 price tag makes the kit really only suitable for enthusiasts, who’ll also have to spend at least another $300 for one of the two available 120Hz LCDs that are compatible with the kit. Worse yet, these pricey LCDs are currently limited to entry-level 22-inch panels (1680x1050 max resolution). These compromises make it hard to justify the premium for 3D Vision, even if you’re an early adopter with unlimited funds. Until the price drops and larger 120Hz displays become available, we’re fine gaming in a mere two dimensions.

Nvidia GeForce 3D Vision
Magic Eye

Convincing 3D illusion works in many games; hassle-free installation and calibration.

Pink Eye

Graphical artifacts; frame rate drop; limited compatible monitor options; expensive.

score:6
COMMENTS
avatarGoing Ghetto...

I went ghetto and downloaded the 3D driver for my Nvidia videocard 1GB GTS250 OC and used the glasses from the movie Coraline and I tried it with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and it looks SICK!! You can see the rockets from the rocket launchers fly by. I also tried Left 4 Dead and it's INSANE!! Zombies look great coming at you....don't spend your money on this EXPENSIVE hardware...go ghetto.

Login or register to post comments
avatarAnsewer to question

A 9600GT is similar in architecture to an 8800GT, being a G94 vs. a G92 core based product.  The 8800 has 112 stream processors and the 9600 has 64 (I think I remember this as the main difference), however these 64 have been tweaked to be more effiecent, so it's barely slower than an 8800.  I think the 9600 might also have a bit faster core clock.

Login or register to post comments
avatar3D

If they ever do get 3D like this it will have to be "CHEAP" and easy like the red on the left the blue on the right. I fell for this once years ago nVidia 3D glasses had driver issues game issues. They can forget selling me on this carp.

Linux Mint,Dual boot/Vista,AMD Athlon+ x2 5600,3 Gig ram,500 Gig HDD,ATI 1300 Video.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI know what the author is talking about.

Remember virtual gameboy? That was discontinued... people say that cell phones were bad... what the fuck was virtual gameboy?! it ruined my day. the electromagnet pulses are harmful to the human brain. i got so sick.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI saw this at the CES this

I saw this at the CES this past january and the article doesn't mention that the 3D system doesn't work with ATI video cards.  At least, that what I was told.  As someone using an ATI 4870, I'm not about the shell out $500 plus another $250 for an Nvidia card just for this 3D.

Login or register to post comments
avatarNot to be curt, but, uh...

Not to be curt, but, uh... duh?  Aside from the technical aspects of the glasses, in that they use use Nvidia drivers as the hook to achieve the effect, do any of us here honestly believe that Nvidia would go out of its way to support its technology on the competing platform?

Login or register to post comments
avatarEspecially when ATI's cards

Especially when ATI's cards are too bad, either. I would rather make my technology only compaitable with my technology, then give enthusiast out there to use my gear on another platform.

Login or register to post comments
avataris a 9600gt better than a

is a 9600gt better than a 8800 gt?

call me a noob, but i dont know :P

       -Denis

Login or register to post comments
avatarIt should work.

It should work, when they says that an "8800gt or better" they mean any card with a higher number.

Login or register to post comments
avatarObjects may appear...

If only nVidia had some sort of scaling system to accomodate those who don't work for nVidia and don't understand their branding process.

for instance ATI 4870 < ATI 4870 X2

 

OMGWTFBBQ

Login or register to post comments
avatarIt should

Logic says 9600gt should be better than 8800gt because it's a higher number but it's not thats just the way nVidia does things to sell more cards.

 

Linux Mint,Dual boot/Vista,AMD Athlon+ x2 5600,3 Gig ram,500 Gig HDD,ATI 1300 Video.

Login or register to post comments
avatarNo

No

Login or register to post comments
avatarSorry, but no...

out of the 9 series Nvidia cards, the closest to the 8800GT is the 9800GT (which is basicly just a rebranded card)... and no, your not a noob for asking, its a good question :)

Login or register to post comments
avatarnot in the slightest

not in the slightest

Login or register to post comments
This Month's Issue
FEATURE Windows XP/Vista/7 Tips!FEATURE Monitor Roundup: 7 LCDs ReviewedHOW TOMaster PhotoshopFEATUREAMD's Awesome New GPUWHITE PAPEROrganic LEDs