MSI E350IA-E45 Fusion Motherboard Review
Fusion lands, but is it enough?
It’s a little difficult to review MSI’s new Fusion-based E350IA-E45. Normally, our motherboard reviews consider the CPU as an adjunct to the board since consumers may populate the board with one of numerous CPUs.
That’s not so with the Mini-ITX MSI E350IA-E45 which, as its name implies, incorporates AMD’s brand new 1.6GHz E-350 with AMD’s Radeon HD 6310 graphics part soldered to the board, so you better be happy with the CPU you get.
Fortunately, AMD’s new Accelerated Processing Unit has a lot going for it. For those who don’t know, the APU enmeshes a dual-core x86 core with a fairly powerful graphics core.
MSI’s Fusion board sips power and can play The Sim 3 too
The x86 side of the E-350 chip is nothing to write home about. It’s essentially a slightly narrower iteration of an Athlon 64 core that will outperform or underperform an equivalent Athlon 64 depending on the application that is being run. More exciting is the graphics core, which features 80 Radeon cores all at a very low temperature and low power consumption. How low? At idle – with a very ungreen WD Raptor drive attached and USB optical drive, the entire system drank 28 watts at idle. Watching 1080P video on YouTube pushed it to about 35 to 38 Watts at the wall.
In a preview late last year, we were impressed by the graphics capability of Fusion and we weren’t disappointed in official Lab tests. Before you get too excited – you need to lower your expectations about five notches and then climb down into the basement if you’re expecting GTX 580 graphics and a free Sandy Bridge to boot for $130. The E350IA-E45 is capable of Blu-ray playback, and played 1080P content on the Internet without issues.
But what about gaming? Here we get conflicted. We think Fusion is a great alternative to Intel’s weak Atom line of processors and integrated graphics in notebooks and netbooks. In a desktop computer, however, you’re not as confined as you are with mobile. With that said, the Fusion and MSI board combo does give you playable performance in Sims 3, and somewhat acceptable frame rates in Left 4 Dead 2 as well as Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. We found it wanting at Call of Duty: Black Ops though. When we say playable, we mean at low resolutions such as 1024x768. So, while gaming is far improved over Atom machines with integrated graphics, you won’t be playing at high-res. The board is perfect for someone building a low-power, quiet HDTV streaming or web box. It’s also fine for someone building a miniature PC that will be tucked behind the monitor.
But, and you knew we would say but, our personal preference is for more heft. Say a Core i3 with discrete graphics ala the Kick-ass (and super expensive) Asrock Vision 3D HTPC we reviewed last month. Or even a socketed AM3 processor part.
That’s not to say the E350IA-E45 has no utility, but you need to calibrate your expectations. In the end, Fusion is clearly a better option than Atom with integrated graphics. It's not everything we wanted, but it's a good beginning.
MSI E350IA-E45

POSITIVE
Low power, low cost and eats most Atom boards for lunch
NEGATIVE
Could not boot to 3TB drive and perhaps a little off the power curve
7
| MSI E350IA-E45 | Dell Inspiron Zino | Polywell Giada Ion-100 | Zotac HD Zbox HD | Asrock Vision 3D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6GHz E-350 with AMD Radeon HD 6310 graphics | 1.5GHz Athlon II X2 3250e with integrated 780G cihpset | 1.6GHz Atom 330 w/Ion graphics | 1.8GHz Atom D525 with Ion 2 graphics | 2.4GHz Core i3-370M with Nvidia GeForce GT 425M | |
| Photoshop CS3 (sec) | 438 | 449 | 552 | n/a | 162 |
| Main Concept (sec) | 7,943 | 7,080 | 8,858 | 8,070 | 2,452 |
| 3DMark 2003 | 6,403 | 2,540 | 3,371 | 7,504 | 17,394 |
| Quake III (fps) | 193 | 192 | 118 | 145 | 537 |
| Quake 4 | 43 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 112 |
Comments
![]()
igoka
March 08, 2011 at 11:47am
Looking for my next HTPC build just wondering about this system to play Netflix HD. Is it possible or not ? CPU looks to weak for Silverlight. Well anyway Gordon have you tried to play Netflix HD on it ?
![]()
Eoraptor
March 08, 2011 at 9:30pm
if it can handle Youtube in HD, I'd assume it could handle netflix, hulu, et all. and why does it look to weak for silverlight? the only weakness on that count seems to be that it's single channel memory (a real head scratcher considering my 6 year-old amd board has that)
![]()
titan8813
March 07, 2011 at 2:02pm
Saw this the other day when casually shopping the web for various products. Glad Gordon put it through the ringer and gave us the pertinent information. Not sure why this is being compared to something that costs literally 5x more ($140 vs. $820) given its target market, but they probably figure once you add memory, drive(s), PSU, and case, you're already halfway there. A good start and a nice preview of the upcoming Bulldozer line.
![]()
Fecal Face
March 07, 2011 at 1:56pm
Sounds like an excellent idea for someone who wants to hook up a cheap PC to their TV and play movies / recorded TV in 1080p from a NAS or something.
![]()
D00dlavy
March 07, 2011 at 1:42pm
I'm confused about all this Fusion / Sandy Bridge stuff. Is there a REAL REASON to shift from the conventional socket/chip/discrete graphics solution?
![]()
Eoraptor
March 07, 2011 at 6:22pm
Well it depends on where you fall on the usage scale. As Gordon points out, if you're rocking the old(er) school games, or doing mostly word processing or surfing, it'll save you a hundred bucks or more over a discrete video solution that still gives excellent day to day performance, plus saves quite a few watts of power bill.
but yeah, if you're looking to run Crysis north of 1280 pixels, then yeah, stick with a 1366 or AM+ socket and your choice of discrete graphics cards.
![]()
AETAaAS
March 07, 2011 at 1:58pm
In my opinion, definately not if you are looking towards high performance machines, the 1.6GHz dual core should be evidence enough of that. :p
But in laptops, netbooks or HTPCs (and perhaps some tablets in the coming months, fingers crossed), the low power consumption, compact formfactor and reduced heat generation make an attractive combo for smaller, longer battery life or quieter systems. Which was probably the idea in the first place.
I think some more powerful APUs are coming down the pipe, but I doubt AMD will ever squeeze a 6970 onto a CPU. Maybe. But unlikely. :p
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















