Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Reviews

HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x4

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

A decent entry-level RAID card

Power users who want to take advantage of RAID are typically stuck between a rock and a hard place: their motherboard’s integrated RAID (the quality of which can vary wildly between chipsets) and expensive discrete controllers. HighPoint’s RocketRAID 2640x4 attempts to bridge the gap by offering better-than-onboard performance at a price much lower than fancier discrete cards.

As expected, the RocketRAID 2640x4, which has four SAS/SATA 3Gb/s ports but no onboard processor or memory, performed better than our test bed motherboard’s onboard RAID controller but couldn’t match the performance of the $450 Adaptec 5405, which boasts an onboard 1.2GHz processor and 256MB DDR2 cache.

Setting up the RocketRAID 2640x4 is simple: Drop in the card, hook up the drives, power up your computer, and hit Ctrl+H during boot. HighPoint’s BIOS makes creating and maintaining RAID a snap, and its Windows drivers are easy to install from the included disc.


The RocketRAID 2640x4 is inexpensive, easy to use, and offers huge RAID 5 write speed improvements over integrated controllers.

In two-disk RAID 0, the RocketRAID averaged 174MB/s reads and 148MB/s writes, slightly better than the EVGA’s 166MB/s and 135.9MB/s, but no match for Adaptec’s 210MB/s and 209MB/s. RAID 5, however, is where the difference between onboard RAID and even an inexpensive discrete card like the 2640x4 shines through. Echoing results from our May 2008 RAID controller showdown, using a discrete RAID controller rather than onboard upped RAID 5 write speeds nearly tenfold: 216.5MB/s on the 2640x4 versus only 25.3MB/s onboard. The 2640x4 even surpassed Adaptec’s much more expensive RAID controller in RAID 5 writes, though the Adaptec far outstripped the RocketRAID’s read speeds.

In our previous RAID card roundup, the RocketRAID 3510 took high honors for speedy RAID 5 performance on the cheap, and the 2640x4 continues that trend. As we said at the time, whether you need a discrete RAID card really depends on what you’re doing with it. For RAID 0, an entry-level RAID card like the 2640x4 offers modest boosts over the motherboard’s controller, while a more expensive card will give you bigger gains. In RAID 5, adding a drop-in card will immediately give you a significant increase in average write speeds.

The HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x4 isn’t the most feature-rich RAID card we’ve ever tested, but you get a lot of performance for $140, especially if you want to run RAID 5. The low price point, decent performance, and ease of use make this a good choice for an entry-level RAID controller.

HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x4
Rocketman (song)

Cheap; easy to install and use; improved RAID 5 over onboard controllers.

Rocketman (film)

Lacks stripe size options; RAID 0 not much better than onboard; no onboard processor or memory.

score:8
Benchmarks - RAID 5
 RocketRAID 2640x4
Adaptec 5405
EVGA 680i mobo
RAID 5 RAID 5 (4-disk)
RAID 5 (4-disk)
RAID 5 (4-disk)
HDTach Avg Read (MB/s)161.6
247.7
154.5
HDTach Avg Write (MB/s)
216.520625.3
HDTach Burst Read (MB/s)
373.5815348
HDTach CPU Utilization (%) 234
HDTach Random Access (ms)
7.5
7.57.4
Premiere Pro (sec)
651632843
PCMark Vantage
7,7248,5474,059

Best scores bolded. All RAID controllers were tested on a stock-clocked Intel QX6700 on an EVGA 680i SLI motherboard, using 300GB WD VelociRaptor drives. HDTach 3.0.1.0 and Premiere Pro encoding tests done in Windows XP 32-bit; PCMark Vantage tests run on 32-bit Windows Vista.

Benchmarks - RAID 0
 RocketRAID 2640x4
Adaptec 5405
EVGA 680i mobo
RAID 0 (2-disk)
RAID 0 (2-disk)
RAID 0 (2-disk)
RAID 0 (2-disk)
HDTach Avg Read (MB/s)174.8
210
166
HDTach Avg Write (MB/s)
148.6208135
HDTach Burst Read (MB/s)
394876328
HDTach CPU Utilization (%) 325
HDTach Random Access (ms)
7.47.37.4
Premiere Pro (sec)
642633655
PCMark Vantage
7,2828,1736,900

Best scores bolded. All RAID controllers were tested on a stock-clocked Intel QX6700 on an EVGA 680i SLI motherboard, using 300GB WD VelociRaptor drives. HDTach 3.0.1.0 and Premiere Pro encoding tests done in Windows XP 32-bit; PCMark Vantage tests run on 32-bit Windows Vista.

Specifications
Connection PCI Express x4
RAID Support
0, 1, 1+0, 5, JBOD
Processor None
Memory
None
Connection
Four SAS/SATA ports
COMMENTS
avatarwrong

SAS hard drives are cheaper per gig than SSDs theres no good argumement against t hem

Login or register to post comments
avatarSAS Drives

Plus SAS is still primarily Enterprise class. If you're using SAS at home, you're an Uber-Power User or GEEK like myself.

Login or register to post comments
avatarWhat would be a good sub

What would be a good sub 100$ (CND$ BTW)

I'm looking to setup a Raid 0 aray with 2 500GB WD Sata II drives for windows 7

Anyone have any experience with rosewill products?

Intel C2D E7200

ASUS P5K/EPU MoBo

BFG 8800 GT OC2 Video Card

4GB Kingston HyperX 1066 DDR2 Ram

5 W.D 500GB HD

CoolerMaster 650Watt PS

22'' Ben-Q G2200W LCD

Logitech MX5000 BT wireless keyboard/Mouse

Login or register to post comments
avatarLooking at the numbers above

Looking at the numbers above I don't think I would bother with this card for a RAID 0.  IF you are going RAID 5 I can see the advantage but for a ~10% performance increase on RAID 0 it hardly seems practical.

Login or register to post comments
avatarLow profile bracket

Where do you find a card with a regular bracket? It seems like these raid cards all come with low profile brackets for server boards/racks.

Login or register to post comments
avatarOk im sold!

Time to buy the Adaptec 5405! :P

 

For serious tho, why dont you bastards ever review some SAS drives? I think they are better choice than either the WD VR or SSDs i think at this point because of their price to capacity advantage over SSDs and yet are still faster than the Raptor.

 

I think ill just get a mobo with on board sas controller and get the performance of the Adaptec 5405 raided with SATA drives with out the cost inflation.

 

 

I would like to see a review of something like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822145261

 

or like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822116058 in the future

Login or register to post comments
avatarprobably

They probably dont bother reviewing SAS drives because most people do not like their hard drives to sound like a small prop plane taking off :D Atleast thats why I dont bother with them.

Login or register to post comments
avatarThe SAS drives are not

The SAS drives are not really what makes a bulk of the noise; it's those pesky high speed fans. The downside to SAS for the home user is cost/GB. Hardly anyone outside of the Enterprise is going to pay $150 for a 72GB drive that you need to buy 3 or more of in order to take advantage of increased performance.

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works