HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x4
Posted 08/20/09 at 06:00:03 PM by Nathan Edwards
A decent entry-level RAID card
Power users who want to take advantage of RAID are typically stuck between a rock and a hard place: their motherboard’s integrated RAID (the quality of which can vary wildly between chipsets) and expensive discrete controllers. HighPoint’s RocketRAID 2640x4 attempts to bridge the gap by offering better-than-onboard performance at a price much lower than fancier discrete cards.
As expected, the RocketRAID 2640x4, which has four SAS/SATA 3Gb/s ports but no onboard processor or memory, performed better than our test bed motherboard’s onboard RAID controller but couldn’t match the performance of the $450 Adaptec 5405, which boasts an onboard 1.2GHz processor and 256MB DDR2 cache.
Setting up the RocketRAID 2640x4 is simple: Drop in the card, hook up the drives, power up your computer, and hit Ctrl+H during boot. HighPoint’s BIOS makes creating and maintaining RAID a snap, and its Windows drivers are easy to install from the included disc.

In two-disk RAID 0, the RocketRAID averaged 174MB/s reads and 148MB/s writes, slightly better than the EVGA’s 166MB/s and 135.9MB/s, but no match for Adaptec’s 210MB/s and 209MB/s. RAID 5, however, is where the difference between onboard RAID and even an inexpensive discrete card like the 2640x4 shines through. Echoing results from our May 2008 RAID controller showdown, using a discrete RAID controller rather than onboard upped RAID 5 write speeds nearly tenfold: 216.5MB/s on the 2640x4 versus only 25.3MB/s onboard. The 2640x4 even surpassed Adaptec’s much more expensive RAID controller in RAID 5 writes, though the Adaptec far outstripped the RocketRAID’s read speeds.
In our previous RAID card roundup, the RocketRAID 3510 took high honors for speedy RAID 5 performance on the cheap, and the 2640x4 continues that trend. As we said at the time, whether you need a discrete RAID card really depends on what you’re doing with it. For RAID 0, an entry-level RAID card like the 2640x4 offers modest boosts over the motherboard’s controller, while a more expensive card will give you bigger gains. In RAID 5, adding a drop-in card will immediately give you a significant increase in average write speeds.
The HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x4 isn’t the most feature-rich RAID card we’ve ever tested, but you get a lot of performance for $140, especially if you want to run RAID 5. The low price point, decent performance, and ease of use make this a good choice for an entry-level RAID controller.
Cheap; easy to install and use; improved RAID 5 over onboard controllers.
Lacks stripe size options; RAID 0 not much better than onboard; no onboard processor or memory.
| RocketRAID 2640x4 | Adaptec 5405 | EVGA 680i mobo | |
| RAID 5 | RAID 5 (4-disk) | RAID 5 (4-disk) | RAID 5 (4-disk) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDTach Avg Read (MB/s) | 161.6 | 247.7 | 154.5 |
| HDTach Avg Write (MB/s) | 216.5 | 206 | 25.3 |
| HDTach Burst Read (MB/s) | 373.5 | 815 | 348 |
| HDTach CPU Utilization (%) | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| HDTach Random Access (ms) | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Premiere Pro (sec) | 651 | 632 | 843 |
| PCMark Vantage | 7,724 | 8,547 | 4,059 |
Best scores bolded. All RAID controllers were tested on a stock-clocked Intel QX6700 on an EVGA 680i SLI motherboard, using 300GB WD VelociRaptor drives. HDTach 3.0.1.0 and Premiere Pro encoding tests done in Windows XP 32-bit; PCMark Vantage tests run on 32-bit Windows Vista.
| RocketRAID 2640x4 | Adaptec 5405 | EVGA 680i mobo | |
| RAID 0 (2-disk) | RAID 0 (2-disk) | RAID 0 (2-disk) | RAID 0 (2-disk) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDTach Avg Read (MB/s) | 174.8 | 210 | 166 |
| HDTach Avg Write (MB/s) | 148.6 | 208 | 135 |
| HDTach Burst Read (MB/s) | 394 | 876 | 328 |
| HDTach CPU Utilization (%) | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| HDTach Random Access (ms) | 7.4 | 7.3 | 7.4 |
| Premiere Pro (sec) | 642 | 633 | 655 |
| PCMark Vantage | 7,282 | 8,173 | 6,900 |
Best scores bolded. All RAID controllers were tested on a stock-clocked Intel QX6700 on an EVGA 680i SLI motherboard, using 300GB WD VelociRaptor drives. HDTach 3.0.1.0 and Premiere Pro encoding tests done in Windows XP 32-bit; PCMark Vantage tests run on 32-bit Windows Vista.
| Connection | PCI Express x4 |
| RAID Support | 0, 1, 1+0, 5, JBOD |
| Processor | None |
| Memory | None |
| Connection | Four SAS/SATA ports |
wrong
Submitted by Spider-Mom on Sat, 08/22/2009 - 6:48pm
SAS hard drives are cheaper per gig than SSDs theres no good argumement against t hem
SAS Drives
Submitted by GodFix on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 9:24am
Plus SAS is still primarily Enterprise class. If you're using SAS at home, you're an Uber-Power User or GEEK like myself.
What would be a good sub
Submitted by Mr.Pooney on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 9:59pm
What would be a good sub 100$ (CND$ BTW)
I'm looking to setup a Raid 0 aray with 2 500GB WD Sata II drives for windows 7
Anyone have any experience with rosewill products?
Intel C2D E7200
ASUS P5K/EPU MoBo
BFG 8800 GT OC2 Video Card
4GB Kingston HyperX 1066 DDR2 Ram
5 W.D 500GB HD
CoolerMaster 650Watt PS
22'' Ben-Q G2200W LCD
Logitech MX5000 BT wireless keyboard/Mouse
Looking at the numbers above
Submitted by Lodis4 on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 11:19am
Looking at the numbers above I don't think I would bother with this card for a RAID 0. IF you are going RAID 5 I can see the advantage but for a ~10% performance increase on RAID 0 it hardly seems practical.
Low profile bracket
Submitted by mtjepkema on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 7:27pm
Where do you find a card with a regular bracket? It seems like these raid cards all come with low profile brackets for server boards/racks.
Ok im sold!
Submitted by Spider-Mom on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 6:05pm
Time to buy the Adaptec 5405! :P
For serious tho, why dont you bastards ever review some SAS drives? I think they are better choice than either the WD VR or SSDs i think at this point because of their price to capacity advantage over SSDs and yet are still faster than the Raptor.
I think ill just get a mobo with on board sas controller and get the performance of the Adaptec 5405 raided with SATA drives with out the cost inflation.
I would like to see a review of something like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822145261
or like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822116058 in the future
probably
Submitted by mesiah on Thu, 08/20/2009 - 10:09pm
They probably dont bother reviewing SAS drives because most people do not like their hard drives to sound like a small prop plane taking off :D Atleast thats why I dont bother with them.
The SAS drives are not
Submitted by Lodis4 on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 11:17am
The SAS drives are not really what makes a bulk of the noise; it's those pesky high speed fans. The downside to SAS for the home user is cost/GB. Hardly anyone outside of the Enterprise is going to pay $150 for a 72GB drive that you need to buy 3 or more of in order to take advantage of increased performance.
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






