Hawking Technology 300N Dish Network Adapter

avatar

Hawking Technology 300N Dish Network Adapter

The last unconventional network adapter we examined, hField Technologies’ WiFire Wi-Fi adapter, wowed us with its range, but its sloppy antenna mount robbed it of a Kick Ass award. We didn’t ding it for not working with 802.11n networks because nothing else did like it, either. That’s no longer the case.

Hawking USB Adapter

Hawking Technology's 300N Dish Network Adapter is big and bulky, but it gets

the job done when you're a long way from your router.

Hawking Technology doesn’t have much of a knack for naming products, and this one is no exception. It would be exceedingly tiresome to repeat “Hi-Gain USB Wireless-300N Dish Network Adapter” every time we mention the product, so we’ll just use the model number, instead: HWDN1. Hawking’s HWDN1 is capable of operating with 802.11b, -g, and -n networks; so if you’re operating an 802.11n network, you can leave your router in “n-only” mode.

Like hFields Wi-Fire, the HWDN1 plugs into your laptop’s USB port. Unlike the Wi-Fire, however, Hawking’s HWDN1 doesn’t have any means of being mounted to your laptop; it’s designed to sit on a tabletop next to your laptop, instead. That’s not a big deal unless you’re working in a crowded coffee shop or are actually using the PC on your lap because you don’t have a table.

As you’ve probably guessed, by virtue of its dish shape, the HWDN1 is a highly directional antenna that performs best when it’s aimed squarely in the direction of the router to which it’s connected.  This adapter is much bulkier than the Wi-Fire, measuring four inches wide, 5.25 inches long, and 2.75 inches thick when folded flat for travel (it stands 5.25 inches tall when in use).

We tested the adapter using our new favorite 802.11n router, the dual-band Linksys WRT600N (incidentally, the HWDN1 works only on the 2.4GHz frequency band). As you can see from the benchmark chart below, the adapter performed relatively poorly at close range when compared to Linksys’ WPC600N PC Card adapter, delivering TCP throughput of just 62.3Mb/sec (compared to the WPC600N’s 125Mb/sec at the same location). On the other hand, the HWDN1 was considerably faster than the Wi-Fire, which is limited to operating on 802.11g networks, it performed much better than both adapters in our media-room test, and it clobbered the PC Card adapter in our outdoor tests.

The Wi-Fire remains the extreme-distance champ by virtue of its ability to deliver TCP throughput of 14.5Mb/sec at 350 feet (with the signal passing through a garage firewall and a steel garage door). The HWDN1 maxed out at 13.9Mb/sec at 300 feet and dropped its connection to the router when we ventured further out. Given a choice between the two adapters, however, we’d go with the HWDN1. Its bulky form factor makes it a pain to travel with, but its capacity for operating on 802.11n networks at very long distances gives it an undeniable edge.

Hawking Technology 300N Dish Network Adapter

Dish

Works with 802.11n routers; delivers high throughput at extreme range; compatible with both desktop and laptop machines.

Trough

Bulky, consumes desk space, can’t range quite as far as hField’s 802.11g-only Wi-Fire.

9

Wi-Fi Adapter Benchmarks

Linksys WPC600N
hField WiFire
Hawking HWDN1
Kitchen (20 feet) (Mb/sec)
125.0 21.0 62.3
Patio (38 feet) (Mb/sec) 75.0
20.8 57.4
Bedroom (60 feet) (Mb/sec)
39.2 18.4 43.2
Media Room (35 feet) (Mb/sec)
36.4 15.8 59.9
Outdoors 1 (90 feet) (Mb/sec)
0.9 15.2 27.5
Outdoors 2 (85 feet) (Mb/sec)
0.2 13.2 21.7
Outdoors 3 (300 feet) (Mb/sec)
No connection 15.2 13.9
Outdoors 4 (350 feet) (Mb/sec)
No connection 14.5 No connection
Best scores are bolded. Click here for detailed test criteria.
4

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

Keith E. Whisman

Looks kinda like one of those laser cannons the Rebels were using to defend their hidden base on Hoth from the Empire.

So does the HWDN1 shoot a laser beam?

Also George Carlin died Sunday. Where ever he is roasting he will be missed by a few of his fans..

avatar

TheMurph

That would be a planetary-based Ion Cannon, but I digress. :D

"the first transport... is away!"

avatar

Keith E. Whisman

Those turbo laser cannons that had the dish on them that were totally useless against the at-at's.

avatar

fuzz_64

That's what made the movie so exciting! Taking shot after shot from those lasers did nothing, but Luke with a single thermal detonator could take down an AT-AT on his own!!

These could also be miniature versions of the shield generators used on Endor to shield the Death Star. In fact I'd like a shield generator for my work PC so no one touches it anymore.  Or wait!  Maybe it's a turbo laser, ion canon AND a shield generator all in one!  It'll short out any star destroyers in the area, pick off most attacks with the tubo laser, and have a shield generator for anyone coming in on an AT-AT!

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.