CA Internet Security Suite Plus 2010 Review
This AV app takes aim at inexperienced users, but it misses the mark
When we ran our annual antivirus roundup in the May 2010 issue, many of you wrote in asking why we didn’t include Product X or Product Y. Fair question, so here’s the deal: We could have filled an entire issue reviewing just AV products, but that would have grown old by about page 32. Rather than do that, we’re devoting space each month to cover apps that didn’t make the cut, and CA Internet Security Suite is first up to bat.

Navigating CA's seemingly simple menu system is harder than it looks.
After we installed CA ISS, it quickly became apparent that power users are not the target demographic. CA took a wrecking ball to last year’s version and completely redesigned the UI in an attempt to “eliminate the technobabble that makes PC security difficult to understand and control,” but in doing so, it made it needlessly tedious to poke around under the hood. The main interface consists of four index card–shaped menus that you can cycle through like a tie rack. Sounds easy enough, but if you want to set up a scan schedule, for example, you’ll need to bring up the My Computer card, click the Update Settings link, highlight the Threat Settings tab, and then scroll to the bottom. You’ll fumble around like this until you get accustomed to the interface, and when you do, you’ll discover there’s not a whole lot to play with. Strike one.
Strike two came when we tested for performance. CA ISS added 30 seconds to our test bed’s startup time, trailing only Trend Micro (32 seconds) as the worst offender we’ve analyzed all year. When we fired up PCMark, CA ISS came in dead last and was the only security suite to turn in a score lower than 5,000.

If you see this screen (as we did after CA ISS failed to protect our test bed), then something has gone terribly wrong. The real Windows Security Center will never direct you to a paid security suite.
But our biggest gripe is that CA ISS leaves your system vulnerable to malware, though not because the scan engine is weak. By default, a couple of critical modules are left disabled, including Program Protection, which prevents unknown programs from spawning other programs when executed, and Code Injection Protection, which prevents programs from gaining access to system privileges. Left turned off, our collection of malware was allowed to run amok on our test bed, and that’s inexcusable for a security suite that touts ease of use over everything else. Strike three, batter’s out.
There were a few redeeming qualities that leave us hopeful for next year’s version, such as CA ISS’s stellar subsequent scan times. As is becoming standard practice in the AV industry, CA ISS skips over files that haven’t changed since the last time they were scanned, and this resulted in a subsequent sweep of our system in just three minutes and 19 seconds. We also dig the Link Advisor tool, which tells us if a URL is a gateway to a dangerous site before clicking on it. But these are just a couple of diamonds, the rest is pretty rough.
CA Internet Security Suite Plus 2010

Pringles
Relatively fast scan times; effective link scanner.
Shingles
Greatly slows down boot time; default protection levels are too low.
4
| CA ISS | Norton | ESET | MSE | McAfee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scan 1 (min:sec) | 12:09 | 16:18 | 7:45 | 16:56 | 13:33 |
| Scan 2 (min:sec) | 3:19 | 4:47 | 7:43 | 16:56 | 6:45 |
| PCMark | 4,833 | 5,760 | 6,067 | 5,622 | 5,645 |
| Boot (seconds added) | +30 | +18 | +12 | +9 | +13 |
Comments
![]()
edummett@yahoo.com
November 06, 2010 at 8:39pm
I was running CA IIS 2010 on a Vista SP2 machine, IE 8. All Microsoft and third party software maintenance was up to date.
The product had been running without fault since it was installed clean months ago. About three weeks ago I started getting an error message telling me that the Common Event Manager (ccEvtmgr) had stopped working. Typically the error came up on Windows startup, but it would also come up later. The error was non-fatal, i.e., ISS still seemed to function and neither Vista or any other apps seemed to be impacted. The product was also running on a XP SP3 machine, but no signs of this error.
Both Microsoft and respondents to the CA forum concerning this problem had suggested reinstalling the program. But threads in the forum all stated that this did not solve this error. Further, Vista identified the error as due to Data Execution Protection (DEP). It suggested that you turn off the DEP feature for the ccEvtmgr executable. However, I attempted this and Vista stated that the Event Manager must run with DEP enabled.
Since the Common Event Manager couldn't run without DEP I reasoned that this was an issue for CA, not Microsoft. But there was nothing on the forum or the Support website suggesting that CA was addressing the problem. Also, I was not getting DEP errors on any other application which ruled out a systemic (i.e., Vista) problem.
The response from CA was "Sorry, no ETA on a fix yet, but the issue is logged in our system and has had some diagnostic activity in recent days."
Since I had some spare time yesterday I decided to attempt a deinstall/reinstall of ISS 2010 as recommended in the posts.
What a disaster ! The ISS product refused to deinstall cleanly. It left a remnant of the Firewall behind that blocked Internet connectivity for both wired and wireless connections. This effectively made usage of any of CA's web based tools impossible. Downloading a deinstaller to a USB drive was ineffective since the tool will not run without an Internet connection. The Firewall remnant could not be deinstalled since it kept requesting the installation CD, even though the ISS product was installed via a download. Also, the deinstall kept hanging on the CA Parental Controls, despite the fact that I had never installed this feature.
So, after twelve (12) hours, two system restores, and a number of registry edits and manual deletions later I had finally removed ISS sufficiently that I was able to restore Internet connectivity and install another security product. Needless to say I will not be reinstalling ISS !
In my twenty years of using and supporting Windows systems I have never gone through an experience like this.
![]()
hein.lotter
August 10, 2010 at 8:45am
I am a CA employee and used previous versions successfully but the last 2 version are junk. Stay away!! The support stinks and please do not allow them to take control of your machine. All they know is uninstall/reinstall and fowling up what is still working. You cannot trust the product from one boot to another.
![]()
Michael Ellis
June 22, 2010 at 10:59am
I had the old CA ISS on my older computer and it was fantastic. The firewall was a bit too powerful but the computer was untouchable and the software worked great. This new software is complete garbage. Not only is the software bad and expensive, but it has serious problems with compatibility with different screen resulutions with leaves you with unworkable drop down menus. If you are thinking of buying this, just don't!
ps You are right about the settings. I think they may leave certain settings off because the frak with your computer though.
![]()
Blues22475
June 22, 2010 at 9:17am
I never figured CA would get big enough to attempt to make an internet suite. I am always skeptical of suites mainly because every computer I've installed them on (ranging from Norton to others) always takes a big performance hit (I expect a performance hit nonetheless).
----------------------------------------
Ignorance is man's greatest enemy.
![]()
IFLATLINEI
June 22, 2010 at 8:43am
Are there any more lesser known AV programs youd like to test before you get to the ones people will actually use?
![]()
MaximumMike
June 22, 2010 at 11:24am
They are as familiar to anyone knowledgable of security as Adaware, SpyBot, and Norton are. They are perhaps best known for grabbing up and ruining PestPatrol, which was at the time the best SpyWare scanner you could get your hands on. I have always avoided them as a rule of thumb, but I would hardly rate them as a lesser known company, although I would rate them much lesser in the performance category.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















