Asus Rampage II Extreme

To run Asus’s $400 Rampage II Extreme board you’d have to be either extreme or the world’s biggest poseur. How extreme would you have to be? You’d have to be the type of person who boils liquid helium atop his CPU to keep it cool. And because you can’t waste time overclocking from within the OS, you’d want to reach your hands into the guts of your case and use the board’s PCB-mounted controls that let you check and change voltage, fan speeds, and temps on a tiny one-line LCD external display.
In fact, you’d be so damn hardcore, you wouldn’t even fully trust those voltage readings from the board. Instead, you’d want to hook your Fluke meter directly to the available ports on the board to check the voltage of the CPU, the PCI Express lanes, and the north bridge directly. That’s how badass you’d be.
OK, but what if you’re just a poseur? Don’t worry, you’re set, too. Just fire up the OS applet, set your 3.2GHz Core i7-965 to “i7-crazy-4.0,” and you’re good to go. Now people will think you’re an extreme overclocker when all you did was let the board do the work for you.
Whether you’re a poseur or an extremist, the Rampage II Extreme has everything you need, including six DIMM slots, tri-SLI, and CrossFireX support, as well as licensed Creative audio support that gives you up to EAX4. There are some problems, however. Our biggest issue is that Asus still can’t seem to get Turbo mode to work correctly. You should be able to set Turbo mode based on the thread load on the CPU, but Asus only lets you overclock all cores simultaneously. We also felt overwhelmed by the applets on the board. Between the controls for AI Suite, TurboV, TweakIt, and EPU-6, we couldn’t keep straight what each tool did, and ultimately ignored them all.
As we’ve noted in previous reviews, differences in how motherboard vendors treat their BIOSes and Core i7 overclocking options make it difficult for us to run an exact apples-to-apples comparison among boards. For what it’s worth, though, the Rampage II Extreme fell right into the middle of the pack in our benchmarks. With BIOS updates for i7 boards arriving on a monthly schedule, it’s clear that third-party boardmakers are still trying to get a handle on the brave new world of Core i7.
So, say you’re not that extreme nor do you want to appear to be, well then, we think you’re probably better off with a different, less expensive board.
Asus Rampage II Extreme

Corvette
If you like adjusting BIOS settings such as CPU Differential Amplitude, the Extreme is for you.
Chevette
Turbo mode doesn’t work correctly, and the toggle switch is difficult to use.
9
| Asus Rampage II Extreme | Intel DX58SO / 403 | |
|---|---|---|
| PC Mark Vantage x64 | 7,117 | 7,082 |
| ProShow (min:sec) | 9:36 | 9:12 |
| MainConcept (min:sec) | 17:25 | 18:00 |
| 3DMark Vantage CPU | 48, 329 | 45,424 |
| HD Tach (MB/s) | 220 | 185 |
| Valve Particle Test (fps) | 168 | 155 |
| Quake 4 (fps) | 246 | 224 |
| Everest Ultimate Copy RAM (MB/s) | 20,232 | 19, 182 |
| Everest Ultimate Latency TAM (ns) | 32.5 | 31.9 |
| Sisoft Sandra Bandwidth (GB/s) | 27.03 | 26.3 |
Best scores are bolded. Our test bed consists of a Core i7-965 Extreme Edition CPU, 6GB of Corsair DDR3/1600, an EVGA GeForce 280 GTX videocard, a PC Power and Cooling TurboCool 1200 power supply, a WD Raptor 150GB drive, and Vista Home Premium 64-bit. HD Tach scores were achieved using an Intel X25-M SSD.
![]()
efougner
June 18, 2011 at 7:46pm
I just bought a core i7 extrem cpu, and a asus rampage III motherboard and it dosn't come anywhere close to some of these benchmarks....in this section, you indicate the rampage II gets a cpu score of 48, 329 runing 3d mark vantage....but then under the asus rampage III gets a cpu score of only 18,569 running the same test...It looks like maybe you swaped gpu and cpu scores....what's up with that? I know my gpu could be faster as it's only a GTX 480....but you have to admit....you screwed the benchmark results somehow...a drop of 30,000 points between motherboards using the same socket, although a different chipset?....that can't be real!!!!
![]()
ezamoe
March 08, 2010 at 4:31pm
i've been running this board for 6 months now and i love it. it's pricey as hell and i'm not rich so i had to save a little to get it but i have no regrets. it's rock solid and does what's asked of it without throwing you any curves. i'm getting a consistent 3.60 GHz out of a i7-920 on the stock fan. no water. and it's so easy. i ask, it does. not bad for a relatively cheap cpu. it makes me want to burn this chip up on purpose just to see what it will take.
![]()
FRAGaLOT
April 06, 2009 at 5:56pm
Article is a total cut and paste from the magainze from about 3 months ago. ZZZzzz....
![]()
DMI PC Repair
April 06, 2009 at 2:17pm
Anyone who overclocks a i7 is retarded. Or has more money than sense. You buy low and go high. Props to ASUS but a $400 board can only be justified if you don't have to manually set it up. I'm a huge fan of the EPU-6 engine. Auto overclocking to get out of rough spots is cool.
![]()
457R4L
April 06, 2009 at 1:02pm
To be completely honest, this is the best solution for i7 processors. If you consider the fact that you won't need a sound card due to excellent onboard sound. It is the P6T on steroids, and the premium is worth the stability and ease of overclocking. If the price for the full ATX board is to much go for the Rampage II GENE which has everything except you lose expansion pcie 1x slots.
![]()
Zoomer
April 06, 2009 at 11:05am
...is this kind of thing really necessary? Boards past $300 in price aren't justified. If you're going to OC, you better know what you're doing. Don't make it easy for the noobs. They should have to learn the hard way (or through studying up :I).
Also, I'd like to mention that for whatever reason, I had to login to view this, though this is the first time this has occured. Early access review or problem with the page?
















