Reviews

Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe Wi-Fi

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponReddit

Out of sight and out of mind usually means no one even knows–or cares–that you're alive. That’s the problem AMD’s chipset division has faced lately.

Asus M3A32

With Nvidia still ruling the roost in Phenom and Athlon 64 chipsets, AMD’s chipset division doesn’t get much press for its new chipsets. Here’s a news flash though, some pretty compelling motherboards are using the new 790FX chipset.

The Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe is one of them. One the first boards available that supported AMD’s Phenom, the M3A32-MVP is pretty much the reference board as far as Phenoms go.

The board takes full advantage of the large number of PCI Express 2.0 lanes available in the 790FX chipset by offering no fewer than four x16 physical PCI Express slots. With two x16 ATI cards installed, you get x16 speeds per card. With three, you get one slot operating at x16 and two operating at x8. With four cards installed, all operate at x8 speeds, albeit PCI-E 2.0 speeds.

All the other parts required of a higher-end board are included: IEEE-1394A using an Agere FW322 chip, Gigabit Ethernet using a Marvel part, and, in welcome break from Realtek audio, an Analog Devices ADI1988 HD Audio CODEC part.

The rear I/O is quite good with up to six USB ports, a six-pin IEEE-1394A port, optical and coax SPDIF, a single eSATA, and a keyboard PS/2 port. Asus includes its signature wireless part. Here, it’s a 802.11b/g Atheros chip mounted on the motherboard. The antenna is properly mounted on a short cable, so you can prop it on your desk instead of it being buried behind your PC.

As we mentioned, the board and chipset are ready to run AMD’s latest Phenom CPUs, including the Phenom X4 9850 chip. In fact, only three 790FX boards are qualified for the 9850, and the Asus is one of them. Although we haven’t seen much need for it yet, the M3A32-MVP Deluxe Wi-Fi is an AM2+ board, which means that it supports higher HyperTransport 3.0 data rates and features a split-ground plane. This separates power between the CPU cores and the integrated memory controller and contributes to better power savings.

We found no major gaffes with the layout, but the Wi-Fi card is a tad bit tight. Asus learned long ago not to screw up the SATA ports, so all six available ports feature angled connectors.

To test the board, we mounted a 2.5GHz Phenom X4 9850, a standard clocked GeForce 8800 GTX card, and 2GB of Corsair Dominator RAM and installed a fresh copy of Windows XP Professional with SP2 installed. The latest BIOS available was used in each case as well as the latest drivers for the board. Our main comparison point was another 790FX-based board, the MSI K9A2 Platinum. In the numbers game, with the same hardware and drivers, performance is usually close. Here, they’re practically identical.

In other words, don’t get worked up over performance – they’re the same. That really turns this into a feature/spec battle. In the slot war, the MSI board has a leg up. Both give you four physical PCI-E x16 slots and two PCI slots, but the MSI board gives you one more x1 PCI. The Asus’s onboard ADI chip is preferred to the Realtek audio part on the MSI.

We do have one big issue with the board, though, and it’s not about the hardware–it’s with Asus’s website. How the world’s leading motherboard vendor can have the worst bandwidth is beyond us. It’s as though the entire website is running on a $12 DSL account. It would also be nice if Asus adopted an online updater similar to MSI’s. Right now, the Asus will do online updates, but only of the BIOS.

If you pointed a phaser at us and forced us to pick, we’d probably go with the Asus board, but honestly, its performance is so close to the MSI board's that it seems hard to justify the extra $70. The Wi-Fi seems cool, but unless you’re really going to use it, it’s a bit extravagant.

Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe Wi-Fi
Asgard

Good performance; supports up to 4 GPUs.

Aspartame

Could use another couple of SATA ports; Asus's website doesn't meet expectations.

VERDICT score:8 www.asus.com
Specs & Benchmarks

Asus M3A32-MVP
MSI K9A2 Platinum
CPU
Phenom X4 9850
Phenom X4 9850
Clock 2.5GHz 2.5GHz
L2 Cache 2MB 2MB
FSB/x N/A N/A
RAM Clock 1,066 1,066
RAM Settings 5-5-5-15-2T 5-5-5-15-2T
GPU GeForce 8800GTX GeForce 8800GTX
GPU Clock 576/900/1350 576/900/1350
GPU Drivers 169.21 169.21
PCMark Overall
8,206
8,302
PCMark CPU 7,409 7,367
PCMark RAM 4,766 4,704
PCMark GPU 12,610 12,308
PCMark HDD 7,317 7,145
Cinebench 10 8,079 8,034
ProShow 20:13 20:06
MainConcept 31:27 31:42
3DMark06 Overall 12,020 11,862
3DMark06 CPU 3,807 3,776
HD Tach Avg. 77.4 77.4
ScienceMark 2.0 Overall 1,611.54 1,615.26
ScienceMark 2.0 MEM 7,882.5 7,969.66
Valve Particle test 71 71
UT3 standard 83 82
FEAR Max/min 213 217
Quake 4 low 152.7 144.3
3DDB 2,236 2,241
UE Mem Read 8,149 7,664
UE Mem Write 5,037 5,024
UE Mem Copy 8,586 8,558
UE Mem Latency 54.7 56.3
COMMENTS
avatarAsus's website doesn't meet expectations

I don't understand how "Asus's website doesn't meet expectations."  Are you new to Asus products?  I really don't know how else your expectations could possibly have risen to the point where the website could disappoint.  Me, hell, I'm just thrilled when their website doesn't try to run malicious code on my browser or play that music from the old hamsterdance site.

Login or register to post comments
avatarwebsite

Asus makes boards with a lot of good features, but I agree that their website is just horrible. Whenever I'm buying a motherboard I have a really hard time deciding whether the features of an Asus board are worth all of the pain and suffering of downloading drivers from their website.

Login or register to post comments
avatarCompatability

  I recently purchased  one of these new motherboards with integrated graphics and HD support from ATI.  I thought this would be a great option for my media machine.  I put in a 9850 and later found out that although it had an AM2+ socket it was incompatible with this CPU.  Well, I purchased a second chip to replace it and decided to update my gaming rig.  I picked out the M3A32-MVP MB for the 9850 CPU and moved over the 4gigs of DDR2 1066 that I had purchased for the media center machine. Today I ordered in a HD4870 card to replace my 1900xtx.  It looked like supporting the underdog (AMD/ATI) was paying off on performance/value.

Ok- My last phase on this rig was going to be adding a proper sound card.  As you guys always mention on your podcast and in the mag onboard sound can never compete wiith a proper sound card. I was eyeing out this X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series that has a nice front connection bay and I can not be sure it is compatible with the M3A32-MVP motherboard. The PCI express on the sound card looks like a much narrower connection than the slots on my board.  Is this sound card truly compatible with this board and only one graphics card?

Killer robots, Alien Menace, Atomic Monsters, Dehumanization, the Random Assailant, Technology Is Not Your Friend, and most recently Genetic Horror. Things worth gaming about.

Login or register to post comments
avatarPCI-E

 The one connection that this motherboard is missing, is a PCI-E 1x connection. I've done a little search (practice your Google-Fu) and from what I found, you should be able to plug a PCI-E 1x device into a PCI-E 16x slot. I guess the worst that could happen is that the device doesn't work and you're stuck with a card you can't use.

 

-= I don't want to be dead, I want to be alive! Or... a cowboy! =-

Login or register to post comments
avatarCPU Temp

 When you were runnig your benchmarks on this motherboard, did you notice that your CPU temps were high (in the 50C range)? I've been using this board since Monday, and am finding that with my Phenom 9600 (stock cooling) I'm running around 51C. In my old motherboard (Asus M2A-MVP) I was getting around 41C. I'm using Arctic Silver Ceramique thermal compound, and have followed the directions on the website for proper application. I cleaned the heatsink and cpu and reapplied the correct amount.

Does this board just run hot or should I be concerned?

 

-= I don't want to be dead, I want to be alive! Or... a cowboy! =-

Login or register to post comments
avatarIt has to be off

Mine shows 49C idle and 54C load, that seems off for a 5000+ x2 black edition at 3.0GHz with 0.01v increase to 1.36v

 

Login or register to post comments
RESOURCE CENTER

THIS MONTH's ISSUE
FEATURE Windows Tips: Find out what works and what doesn't as we test the most commonly prescribed Windows tipsHOW TO Customize and streamline your Windows desktop Core i7 Check out Intel's next-gen chip, up close and personal The Reactor We preview the first production-ready oil-immersed PC

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?