Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Reviews

Acer easyStore H340

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Ample thrills with minimal frills

Acer’s entry-level easyStore H340 gives you everything you need to attach a robust Windows Home Server to your network, with plenty of room to expand. Its technical specs edge out HP’s comparably-priced LX195—both are budget servers equipped with a 1.6GHz Atom processor, but the H340 includes 2GB of RAM and 1TB of included disk storage. The feature that really sets Acer’s offering apart, however, is the availability of four hot-swappable drive bays, meaning you can add three additional 3.5-inch SATA drives with ease. And if those aren’t enough, the H340 also has five powered USB ports and even an eSATA port for you to go nuts with expansions.

Sweet hardware aside, the software bundled with the H340 is pretty basic. Included server Add-ins provide compatibility for DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) supported hardware and iTunes library sharing, but the Lights Out power management Add-in is something you can freely download for any WHS build. You also get six months of McAfee virus protection for your server, but this is a service that you can’t uninstall from the WHS console—you’ll have to use Remote Desktop to manually remove it.

One other notable feature is a one-touch USB backup button. Plug any USB hard drive into the front of the server, push the button, and the H340 automatically copies all of the files into the Public Shared Folder. It’ll also sort the files based on file type, distributing them into music, video, and photo folders. We found this to be a really quick and efficient way to back up the myriad USB keys found lying around at home. As a starter package, the Acer H340 is great for power users who want a home server without building their own.

<< Back to the Windows Home Server Index

Acer easyStore H340
Expand

Better value than HP MediaSmart LX195; four swappable drive bays; one-touch USB backup.

Expunge

Included software is pretty basic.

score:8
Benchmarks

HP MediaSmart LX195
Acer easyStore H340
Maximum PC's custom WHS
Small Files Upload (sec) 13.3 17.6 10.8
Large File Upload (sec) 5.3 6.6
3.9
Small Files Download (sec)
12.1
9.8 9.0
Large File Download (sec)
4.1 4.4 3.8
Best scores are bolded. To measure home server transfer speeds, we copy a 695MB folder and a 263MB video file from a desktop machine hard-wired to the server and back using the Windows broswer.
COMMENTS
avatarImprove on stock cooling?

Does anyone have ideas about improving the cooling setup for the easystore? I have one and it seems like the atom cpu runs pretty hot under load (idle 58/load 65). I'd just like a leetle more headroom if I want to add-in a low profile htpc graphics card or when I'm transcoding video. Thanks!

To the previous post, log into your home server via the Remote Desktop connection program on your pc. Then go to Add/Remove Programs in the server's Control Panel and remove the McAfee AV that way. That worked for me.

-------------------

"Shut up, Loiosh."

"I beg your pardon?"

"Never mind. Private joke."

Login or register to post comments
avatarRemoving the McAfee Software

Does anyone know how to uninstall the McAfee software that comes preloaded on this machine?  It is not listed among the "add-ins".  Thanks in advance for any thoughts. 

 

Login or register to post comments
avatarsmall file transfers take

small file transfers take longer than large file transfers? idk much
about severs but i think u got something mixed up here in the
benchmarks. (copy pasted from other nas box review)

Login or register to post comments
avatarFine Print

It says under the scores "To measure home server transfer speeds, we copy a 695MB folder and a 263MB video file from a desktop machine"

the 695mb would be a folder filled with 'small files', but it is larger and will take longer to transfer. The single 263mb is the large file. That's why the 'large' file takes less time to transfer, it's physically smaller. The only reason the benchmarks do both is because some devices bog down horribly under thousands of files done at once, but speed demon through one massive file (in comparison of rate to size ratio).

Login or register to post comments
avatarohhhhhhh kktyvmthx!!!! =)

ohhhhhhh kktyvmthx!!!! =)

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works