Quantcast

Maximum PC

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password.

Reviews Razer Barracuda AC-1

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditSlashdot

As we said with the Auzentech, we’re impressed when companies go above and beyond reference designs for products. Razer’s Barracuda AC-1 is such a product. Though it uses the same C-Media Oxygen HD chip as the X-Meridian, you wouldn’t think the two cards were related.

The AC-1 gives you a proprietary DVI-like connector that you can directly connect to the Razer’s HP-1 headset (or your standard speakers using the included dongle). And like the X-Meridian, the AC-1 features dual optical ports, but this card is definitely intended for gaming. And that’s where it gets interesting. The CMI8788 isn’t a DSP, like the X-Fi, it’s more of a super I/O chip that passes data from the PCI bus to the various components on the AC-1 at a very efficient clip.

Most of the filtering for 3D effects, including Dolby and other processor-intensive chores, is done on the computer’s CPU. In FEAR, for example, the X-Fi’s DSP gives it about a 10 percent frame-rate advantage over the other cards in analog mode. (Dolby Digital encoding adds even more overhead to the Razer card, but the X-Fi is incapable of real-time DD5.1 encoding.)

We’ve been wondering if our stance against host-based audio was outdated in the age of multicore CPUs, but a 10 percent hit is still painful—it’s like dropping the CPU down a rung or two.

Of course, the DSP doesn’t always work against the AC-1. In 3DMark03, which uses simpler audio routines, the AC-1 performs the same as or better than the X-Fi. Performance could also improve if the drivers for the AC-1 were multithreaded.

In gaming fidelity, the AC-1 fared well in our tests, with one exception. In Battlefield 2, we noticed dropouts in audio. The same happened with the X-Meridian, so we suspect it’s a problem with the chipset or its drivers that is induced by the tremendous amount of audio BF2 throws at you.

Where does that leave the AC-1? At $200, it’s pretty expensive. In fact, the AC-1 costs more than the X-Fi with its fancy schmancy (and so far useless) onboard X-RAM. It doesn’t help that the AC-1 lacks OpenAL support and sounds inferior to the Creative card in many of the games we tested.

Click to Enlarge

The Barracuda AC-1 features a proprietary DVI-like connector that can be used with Razer’s multichannel headphones.

Razer Barracuda AC-1
www.razerzone.com
plus
THE RUTLES

Doesn’t include Creative’s software bloat.

minus
THE BEATLES

Five-volt keying makes the card ineligible for PCI-X slots.

verdict:8


BENCHMARKS
  Barracuda AC-1
Fear 5.1 Min (FPS) 68
Fear 5.1 Avg (FPS) 141
Fear 5.1 Max (FPS) 282
Fear Dolby Digital Live Min (FPS) 59
Fear Dolby Digital Live Avg (FPS) 126
Fear Dolby Digital Live Max (FPS) 247
3DMark03 2.1 0 Sources 85.7
3DMark03 2.1 24 Sources 75.1
3DMark03 2.1 60 Sources 73.3
3DMark03 DDL 0 Sources 85
3DMark03 DDL 24 Sources 77
3DMark03 DDL 60 Sources 71.4
Best scores are bolded. Our killer rig consisted of an Athlon 64 FX-60, 2GB of DDR400, 400GB 7,200rpm, and a GeForce 7950 GX2 running Windows XP Professional.
COMMENTS
avatari guess its not that surprising...

a sound card with a heatsink?!?!

my god.
whats this world coming to.
now i just wonder when the first double slot soundcard will come to market.

Login or register to post comments
avatarif you saw me it was 2 late!

have you tried it out?

Login or register to post comments

Risk Free Offer! Get 2 Free Trial Issue and 2 CD-Roms

THIS MONTH's ISSUE
MaxPC Cover Image here
FEATURE Can Any PC Beat the MacBook?HANDS ON Nvidia's GeForce 280 GTX FIRST LOOK The Power Users Guide to Firefox 3 WTF!?! We review a crazy MSI mobo with DDR2 & DDR3 support