With SATA 6Gb/s Specification Coming, SATA-IO Provides Naming Guidance
Posted 08/18/08 at 07:39:32 PM | by Mark Edward Soper

Confused by terms like SATA II, SATA Gen 2, and SATA 3Gb/s? You're not alone. With today's release (link in PDF format) of the PHY (physical layer) portion of the forthcoming SATA revision 3.0 specification (details here), SATA-IO, the trade association responsible for defining Serial ATA specifications, is trying hard to stomp out the many misidentifications of SATA specifications and features over the years.
SATA revision 3.0 doubles the speed of the current 3Gb/s version, reaching transfer speeds of 6Gb/s. So, what should you call the newest member of the SATA specifications family? According to the SATA Naming Guidelines, here's what to do:
- The first reference in a document should read: "Serial ATA International Organization: Serial ATA Revision 3.0." Additional references can be to either "SATA Revision 3.0" or "SATA 6Gb/s."
SATA-IO is also serious about cleaning up the confusion surrounding current technologies and products as well:
- Don't use "SATA I" or "Gen 1": instead, use "SATA Revision 1.x" or "SATA first generation" or "SATA 1.5Gb/s."
- Likewise, "SATA II" or "SATA Gen 2" are also on the "don't talk that way" list, replaced by "SATA Revision 2.x" or "SATA second generation" or "SATA 3.0Gb/s."
The SATA Naming Guidelines page includes a useful table for helping computer users, marketers, technical writers (like yours truly) and others properly describe the three generations of SATA drives and devices. With SATA Revision 3.0 expecting to be ratified by the end of the year, here's hoping this initiative will help undo the years of confusion over SATA.
Look for the SATA Label...
SATA-IO is also working to make sure that SATA devices work properly, with today's launch of its certified logo program (link in PDF format). To learn more about SATA-IO, see the SATA-IO website.
Mystery Solved!
So, where did the term SATA II come from? SATA II was the original name of the current SATA International Organization (SATA-IO).
Illustration courtesy of SATA-IO.
Really when can we expect
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 2008-08-19 02:58
Really when can we expect to see hardware that fully saturates SATA 3.0GB/s? Does SSD's do this? It would seem to me that multiple actuated read heads on a hard drive is pretty much the only way to really saturate SATA 3.0 or even SATA 6gp/s.
Perhaps a hard drive that has two platters and each platter has two independant arms or more with read/write head that can read and write independantly of each other. Basically what I'm thinking about is a hard drive that can read data and write data at the same time. Even read two different areas on the same side of the same platter at the same time. From what I've seen only one thing can happen at a time. This has'nt changed since the first hard drive.
Now this would be cool and fast. Perhaps it would out perform SSD.
Here's the problem I have with the name SATA 3.0G
Submitted by bcweir on Mon, 2008-08-18 21:39
Now you're asking Joe Consumer to tell the difference between SATA 3.0 (6 Gb/s throughput) and Sata 3.0G (3 Gb/s throughput).
Sata 3.0 or Sata 3.0Gb/s? Confused? You won't be the only one!
I wish they would just force
Submitted by PhynaeusClaw on Mon, 2008-08-18 18:38
I wish they would just force everyone to use the SATA x Gb/s naming convention. It is straightforward and actually communicates some useful information, not just a title.
4 NEW COMMENT(S) | 4 TOTAL COMMENTS
5 NEW COMMENT(S) | 5 TOTAL COMMENTS









