Wikipedia's Contributors Diminishing in Number

12

Comments

Comments are closed on this article

avatar

shubhrajoshi

Contrbuting to Wikipedia? Never again!" And I haven't contributed to them since.

 

Las Vegas holidays

avatar

Eoraptor

i think the declining contribution numbers is less that Wikipedia is decreasing in popularity, and more that it's not the only game in town any more. Wikia is open source, and now, instead of directly editing a "wikipedia" page, with edit wars and hoops to jump through, you can go and edit a similar page on a niche wikia site with far less of a hassel.

Truly it's a problem that is entirely wikipedia's own making. and yes, what they said about the saturation of topics leaving little new territory to be explored is an issue as well.

avatar

Happy

Exactly, I used to contribute to Wikipedia but I stopped when I tried to add a little tiny bit about the new common usage of the word "fag" (where it's used to mean the equivalent of "lame" or "uncool" or "annoying") to the page on the word and I even gave two pieces of evidence to back up what I said but they refused my edit and sent me a message giving me some bullcrap about why they wouldn't post it. That was when I told myself "Ok, they wanna be fags and block a perfectly innocent informative edit, fine, then I'll just stop contributing. Contrbuting to Wikipedia? Never again!" And I haven't contributed to them since. Or given money anymore either. I still look stuff up on Wikipedia but I refuse to help it monetarily or by adding info to pages.

avatar

Happy

Exactly, I used to contribute to Wikipedia but I stopped when I tried to add a little tiny bit about the new common usage of the word "fag" (where it's used to mean the equivalent of "lame" or "uncool" or "annoying") to the page on the word and I even gave two pieces of evidence to back up what I said but they refused my edit and sent me a message giving me some bullcrap about why they wouldn't post it. That was when I told myself "Ok, they wanna be fags and block a perfectly innocent informative edit, fine, then I'll just stop contributing. Contrbuting to Wikipedia? Never again!" And I haven't contributed to them since. Or given money anymore either. I still look stuff up on Wikipedia but I refuse to help it monetarily or by adding info to pages.

avatar

alcarcalimo2364

Ok, technically i'm a "fag", and i don't quite understand how them blocking you from editing makes them "fags", regardless of whether you think it means lame, uncool or annoying. And if you look up the page, there's plenty of descriptions of its popular use, regardless of its offensiveness. Glad you aren't contributing anymore.

avatar

Phosphorous

I'd say 90% of my professors would not let us even consider using Wikipedia as an online resource.  We always had to use scholarly articles and things of that nature.

avatar

tornato7

I got my teachers to approve wikipedia as a resourse by consulting the english AND spanish page of each article for discrepancies. Sometimes there are, in which case i don't use it.

avatar

ccardarelli

Yeah, but often the cited sources linked in the footnotes were definitely okay for my professors.

avatar

Eoraptor

Agreed there, As long as you are diligent about reading the entire wiki through to the footnotes, it's really not AS BAD so some detractors like to claim.

avatar

TerribleToaster

Exactly. As long as you use wikipedia to find the scholarly articles, you're golden.

avatar

Phosphorous

That's typically what I do.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.