As Wiki Ages, Volunteers Drop Off
Wikipedia has become one of the largest crowdsourcing projects in the world since its debut about 8 years ago. It is also the fifth most popular website, garnering over 325 million visitors each month. Even with all this success, some are afraid for the future of the online encyclopedia. In recent years, volunteers have been leaving the site in huge numbers.
In the first three months of 2009, the English-language Wikipedia experienced a net loss of over 49,000 editors. Compare that to the same period a year earlier when only 4,900 editors were lost. The Wikimedia foundation is aware of the losses, but believes the wiki will be able to continue.
As for the cause, there are two basic schools of thought. The first is that users are becoming weary of the hostile environment Wikipedia can be. Some may not want to engage in heated debates about content. Add to that the increasingly restrictive rules Wikipedia has had to set forth to combat vandalism and you may have a recipe for desertion. Others feel that there just isn’t that much work left to do. Many articles have already been written and rewritten, leaving little for the average editor to add.
Whatever the cause, we can only hope that knowledge continues to be aggregated in Wikipedia. Where do you come down? Is Wikipedia withering on the vine? Or has it just reached a level of maturity that requires less tending to?

![]()
fry
November 24, 2009 at 9:48am
Best thing on the net, really. I use it constantly and contribute cash every year.
The increase in editorial scrutiny has generally been a good thing in my opinion. Less vandalism and fewer badly written entries.
![]()
xecutable
November 24, 2009 at 2:57am
I am not really surprised! The censor that Wiki has is unbelievable. Yes I usually use it to find info, but there are so many people online that have tried creating valuable articles and have been deleted, because the moderators didn't approve them. Logically after you get 3-4 deletes you would just give up.















