Verizon Vehemently Against Wireless Net Neutrality
Verizon is coming out swinging as the FCC is poised to officially adopt new Network Neutrality regulations. The FCC is expected to approve FCC Chair Julius Genachowski’s new policies on October 22nd. The cell carriers contend that the realities of managing their networks are not compatible with the new rules. They have even gone so far as to claim that their mobile networks could be “crippled”.
Verizon CEO, Ivan Seidenberg, didn’t mince words, saying of the proposal, “[It’s] a mistake, pure and simple - an analog idea in a digital universe." He claimed that the regulations may keep Verizon from prioritizing packets for important applications, like emergency communications for first-responders.
Seidenberg indicated that Net Neutrality regulations could damage, or halt, our “progress toward a connected world.” Even as the Verizon chief was making these claims, the FCC received a letter signed by 30 prominent investors in technology businesses that support the proposed regulations. Is Seidenberg overstating his case, or trying desperately to save us all from ourselves?
In a separate joint statement with Google, Verizon clarified that they accept Net Neutrality principals for wireline broadband, just not for their wireless networks. "Verizon and Google might seem unlikely bedfellows in the current debate around network neutrality, or an open Internet. And while it's true we do disagree quite strongly about certain aspects of government policy in this area -- such as whether mobile networks should even be part of the discussion -- there are many issues on which we agree," the companies wrote.

![]()
Zazubovich
October 22, 2009 at 2:01pm
Deregulating the phone companies allowed a lot of innovation but ensured a lot of price gouging. When telephony was a regulated monopoly, everybody got the service they paid for, but everybody got it. Like the deregulated power utilities, however, there is again the opportunity for price gouging, market failure through monopoly/oligopoly, and other abuses of consumers. Once the broken up baby Bells started getting back together,they immediately began colluding to control and manage the pricing structure for phone, wireless, cable, and data. That is what greedy Ivan is concerned about-the fear is having real competitive markets in the US. In Europe and Asia they have much higher speeds, more bandwidth, and lower prices, because they have tightly regulated markets or government monopolies. Corporations have to work harder to prove they are working towards the public good in those environments.
Governments are the only hope of consumer citizens against corporations. Only where governments have been captured by corporations or families are the actions of governments typically against the interests of the public.
![]()
routine
October 22, 2009 at 6:00am
In my experience, any action the government does has the opposite intention.
![]()
kaseykrehbiel
October 22, 2009 at 3:04am
Whether the wireless carriers get an exemption or not, none of this is going to matter in 10 years when mobile phone networks are obsolete.
![]()
elilprat794
October 22, 2009 at 2:36am
I was just wondering what difference drupal has made to the way blogging can be done. Your site is looking good with drupal powered system, at least the person has to spread across the sign up form before putting spam on these blogs. Thanks a lot Drupal. I am even trying to add drupal to my blog in the below sites.
Regards
Rubaldrug testing kits | pass marijuana drug test | pass a drug test
![]()
punditguy
October 21, 2009 at 7:39pm
Verizon is upset that they didn't get a chance to really screw their customers before the government told them they couldn't.
___________________________________________
Preferred boot, but will give this Maximum PC thing a try.
![]()
nekollx
October 22, 2009 at 8:29am
VVAC
sounds like a bad cold
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.














