Live Photo Gallery Vs. Picasa: Digital Photography in Windows 7
Posted 05/15/09 at 10:00:00 PM by Mark Edward Soper
Saving and Undoing Photo Repairs
WLPG saves changes automatically as soon as you view another photo. Picasa's photo repairs aren't saved until you click the Save to Disk button at the top of each folder listing. Unfortunately, Picasa doesn't display any icons to show which photos have been edited. However, Windows Live Photo Gallery places checkmarks next to each editing tool you have used for the current photo.
Windows Live Photo Gallery offers a multi-level Undo feature at the bottom of its menu structure. Picasa has undo buttons on each of its menus, but doesn't display all of the edits in a single location.
Both programs save previous versions and permit reversions: WLPG uses the shadow copy feature built into Windows 7's system protection (restore points) feature, while Picasa retains the previous version internally.
Tagging Photos
By tagging photos, you make it possible to find photos of a particular person, place, object, or event quickly, no matter what folder they're found in. Both WLPG and Picasa support tagging, but how they do it and what they use tags for is very different.
Windows Live Photo Gallery now supports two types of tags: People tags and Descriptive tags. It is also compatible with tags applied with older versions or with Windows Vista's Windows Photo Gallery. Those tags are placed in the Descriptive tags category, but tags for people can be dragged to the People tags category. To create a tag in WLPG, click the appropriate Add a New Tag button and enter the tag name. To add the tag to matching photos or videos, select the photos or videos and drag them to the tag. It's a system quite similar to what Adobe's been doing with Photoshop Elements' Organizer and other products:

To view photos matching the tag, click the tag. In this example, photos from two different folders are displayed with a single click. By signing into Windows Live, you can also see if this person is sharing photos.

You can add multiple people and/or descriptive tags to a photo using the same technique: create the tag, select the photos or videos, and drag the media to the tag, repeating as needed with different tags
In Picasa, you must select each photo, click View, Tags, and enter the tag or tags for the photo. Picasa Web Albums makes extensive use of tags for organization, but Picasa itself does not use tags for filtering.
Sharing Photos
Windows Live Photo Gallery now integrates with Flickr as well as Windows Live albums. To set up integration with Flickr, you select your photos, click Publish, Publish on Flickr, and follow the prompts to authorize Flickr to work with Windows Live Photo Gallery. Once the integration is done, select Publish on Flickr, and Windows Live Photo Gallery sends the photos to the Flickr account you specify, adds them to a photo set you specify, resizes the photos as you specify, and sets the permissions you prefer:

To add support for other services, open Publish, More Services, and Add a Plug-In. You can choose from plugins for Facebook 2.0, YouTube, SmugMug, Picasa Web Publisher, Drupal Publisher, Pixelpipe, and Ipernity.
Picasa supports Blogger (no surprise there, as both are Google products), but it has no support for other photo sharing services. You must use their clients to share from photo folders, with no help from Picasa.
Which One's For You?
As you can see from this comparison, both programs offer a lot to the digital photographer who's not ready to jump into Photoshop Elements but wants decent tools for working with digital photos. Here's how I see it:
Choose Picasa if you're looking for a "Swiss Army Knife"-like set of photo editing and effects tools, especially if you use both JPEG and RAW file types, or if you want special photo effects without moving up to a full-blown photo editor. However, Picasa's tagging and file management tools are clunky and aren't well implemented. Picasa also offers MacOS and Linux versions if you want to use it cross-platform.
Choose Windows Live Photo Gallery if you're mainly concerned about photo and video organization but want high-quality photo repair tools for JPEG images. While WLPG's doesn't offer the effects and creative tools that Picasa does, it often makes better photo repairs - but sadly, only for JPEG files. WLPG, unlike Picasa, also displays videos and can tag them for easy access.
Can you use both? If you're using only JPEG photos, you certainly can. However, I noticed that when I installed Picasa after installing Windows Live Photo Gallery and codecs, I could no longer view RAW thumbnails in Picture Explorer or other folders.
Where to Find Them
The easiest way to get Windows Live Photo Gallery is to open the Getting Started menu in Windows 7 and click Get Windows Live Essentials. You can select the programs you want to install. To obtain Picasa, visit http://picasa.google.com. If you are also using older versions of Windows, both programs also work with Windows XP and Windows Vista. To download Windows Live components for these versions of Windows, go to http://download.live.com/.
Mark Soper is the author of the forthcoming book The Shot Doctor: The Amateur's Guide to Taking Great Digital Photos.
More about RAWDrop
Submitted by Marcus_Soperus on Mon, 05/18/2009 - 11:05am
RAWDrop is actually a file converter for RAW files, not a direct viewer. However, it looks like an extremely useful utility. You drag and drop RAW files to the program window, and it converts images into your choice of 24-bit TIFF, 48-bit TIFF, or 48-bit Photoshop files. While you have the option of saving the converted files using Auto White Balance, this user recommends against it, suggesting you enable the option to use the camera's White Balance setting instead. Happy Converting!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's amazing how illogical a business built on binary logic can be.
I like it .RAW
Submitted by bloodyserb on Sun, 05/17/2009 - 1:25pm
I had to deal with .raw image viewing today as the final stage in hacking a CVS "disposable" camera. Irfanview with plugins and Fast were both useless. Picassa would display them, but with serious artifacts. The app that finally did it for me was RawDrop, which I found off a link from the wikipedia .RAW page. It's just a tiny little app, barely even a GUI and it's free. Why do Microsoft and all the other big names need to make this so complicated?
Native Support
Submitted by bathtbgin on Sat, 05/16/2009 - 7:56pm
With more and more people buying DSLR's it would be nice if windows would natively support the various RAW formats, instead of requiring the user to go out and find the correct codec for their camera and the version of windows that they are using. Well that's assuming a RAW codec actually exists for the windows version they are using (I'm talking about you Nikon...how about supporting 64 bit OS's for a change?)
A few more things, and another viewer option...
Submitted by axelriet on Fri, 05/15/2009 - 4:50pm
The article mention that Windows 7 will offer better imaging performance and this is true, but for this advantage to materialize for raw files supported through WIC codecs, it needs new versions of such codecs, expressely designed for Windows 7. Existing versions (except those from Ardfry), listed on the page that was referenced, are designed for Windows Vista will not provide any notable improvement on Win7.
Photographers also have another option for fast image culling and previewing on Windows 7, namely FastPictureViewer Professional, a lightweight, native 32 and 64-bit image viewer relying on the same raw codecs as those referred to in the article, and offering excellent DirectX-accelerated performance for quickly reviewing lots of pictures. It would not replace WLPG or Picasa, but rather complement them and other image organization software.
I like picasa getting all of
Submitted by yogurt80 on Fri, 05/15/2009 - 2:58pm
I like picasa getting all of this attention. I've used it since it first came out forever ago. Great at organizing.
What the hell is up with Canon not jumping on the 64bit bandwagon? 64 bit is becoming more the norm, and it's so lame that they aren't supporting it yet.
*.gif Support?
Submitted by bingojubes on Fri, 05/15/2009 - 2:42pm
do you know if either of those will eventually support animated .gifs? I'll jump back onto the Windows Gallery if Windows decides to support those. Only reason why I am using Picassa is because it scans all my selected folders, and saves on sorting and resetting thumbnail views everytime.
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






