Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Features

Live Photo Gallery Vs. Picasa: Digital Photography in Windows 7

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Windows Live Photo Gallery Fix (Repair) Menus

WLPG's Main and Exposure Adjustment menus
WLPG's color, Red Eye, Adjust Sharpness, B&W effects, and Straighten photo menus

  

WLPG's cropping tool

Picasa 3.0's Repair Tools

Picasa's Basic menu

Picasa's Tuning menu

Picasa's Effects menu

  

Performing Common Photo Repairs

Although Picasa offers more photo repair tools than WLPG, that doesn't necessarily mean they're better. Compare the results when repairing an underexposed and off-color photo using auto repair tools Auto Adjust (WLPG) and I'm Feeling Lucky (Picasa):

WLPG fixes this underexposed, off-color photo better than Picasa

WLPG's Auto Adjust provides a more natural, less harsh repair.

A much tougher repair task is trying to darken an overexposed photo. For this type of repair, I used WLPG's Adjust Exposure menu and Adjust Color menus and Picasa's Tuning menu:

WLPG and Picasa coping with an overexposed photo

Again, WLPG does a more natural job.

Picasa has two big advantages over WLPG,though:

  • Picasa can perform batch editing of selected photos.
  • Picasa can edit RAW files and convert them to JPEG. By contrast, WLPG can only view RAW files.

Here's Picasa's batch edit feature in action:

Picasa's Batch Edit feature saves time
COMMENTS
avatarMore about RAWDrop

RAWDrop is actually a file converter for RAW files, not a direct viewer. However, it looks like an extremely useful utility. You drag and drop RAW files to the program window, and it converts images into your choice of 24-bit TIFF, 48-bit TIFF, or 48-bit Photoshop files. While you have the option of saving the converted files using Auto White Balance, this user recommends against it, suggesting you enable the option to use the camera's  White Balance setting instead. Happy Converting!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

It's amazing how illogical a business built on binary logic can be.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI like it .RAW

I had to deal with .raw image viewing today as the final stage in hacking a CVS "disposable" camera.  Irfanview with plugins and Fast were both useless.  Picassa would display them, but with serious artifacts.  The app that finally did it for me was RawDrop, which I found off a link from the wikipedia .RAW page.  It's just a tiny little app, barely even a GUI and it's free.  Why do Microsoft and all the other big names need to make this so complicated?

Login or register to post comments
avatarNative Support

With more and more people buying DSLR's it would be nice if windows would natively support the various RAW formats, instead of requiring the user to go out and find the correct codec for their camera and the version of windows that they are using.  Well that's assuming a RAW codec actually exists for the windows version they are using (I'm talking about you Nikon...how about supporting 64 bit OS's for a change?)

Login or register to post comments
avatarA few more things, and another viewer option...

The article mention that Windows 7 will offer better imaging performance and this is true, but for this advantage to materialize for raw files supported through WIC codecs, it needs new versions of such codecs, expressely designed for Windows 7. Existing versions (except those from Ardfry), listed on the page that was referenced, are designed for Windows Vista will not provide any notable improvement on Win7.

Photographers also have another option for fast image culling and previewing on Windows 7, namely FastPictureViewer Professional, a lightweight, native 32 and 64-bit image viewer relying on the same raw codecs as those referred to in the article, and offering excellent DirectX-accelerated performance for quickly reviewing lots of pictures. It would not replace WLPG or Picasa, but rather complement them and other image organization software.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI like picasa getting all of

I like picasa getting all of this attention.  I've used it since it first came out forever ago.  Great at organizing.

 

What the hell is up with Canon not jumping on the 64bit bandwagon?  64 bit is becoming more the norm, and it's so lame that they aren't supporting it yet.

Login or register to post comments
avatar*.gif Support?

do you know if either of those will eventually support animated .gifs? I'll jump back onto the Windows Gallery if Windows decides to support those. Only reason why I am using Picassa is because it scans all my selected folders, and saves on sorting and resetting thumbnail views everytime.

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works