Update to Windows Update Improves Performance, Stirs Controversy



+ Add a Comment


 I let Microsoft take care of it for Me. I haven't had any issues when I was running XP or now with Vista updates. I'm sure they know what their software needs. Everything has been good sofar so I see no reason to change; although I do monitor what is going on.

The grass is always greener on the other side.




On my gaming/multimedia Vista Ultimate 32-bit desktop I let Redmond update everything for me as I also use that desktop to "test" whatever updates may come my way for any software I have including Windows. I have my wife's Vista Home Premium 32-bit laptop (it's primary use is for her schooling) to not auto update anything including Windows updates. After testing concurs that the updates 'should not' bork her system I then allow them through manually. If her computer dies I pay for it in many ways.


Fanboys are annoying. I like to get the most performance per dollar possible and that's all there is to it. Why pay $600 or more for something that'll be $300 or less in 6-9 months? Doesn't make sense. Just be patient.


Unrelated side note: I am so glad I don't own a PS3. They're updates suck soooo much. And you thought Microsoft was bad?



I have my WU set to notify when updates are available but I choose if and when to d/l them. I still haven't upgraded to XP SP 3 yet.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.