UK Analyst Not so Clear on Net Neutrality
Posted 10/26/09 at 03:31:50 PM by Bart Salisbury

You have to seriously wonder how much people pay attention to issues, whether in general or specifically regarding the Internet. Take for example Tajinder Jagdev, the head of Communications, Media and Entertainment of the UK business analytics firm SAS. Jagdev sees the net neutrality proposals recently made by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) a bad thing, because while they rules benefit some parties, they harm others. Thank you Mr. Moto.
According to Jagdev, “The ruling would benefit content companies like Skype but cut into the revenues generated by telecom providers from phone calls. This ultimately raises outstanding issues that need to be addressed in order for the interests of all parties involved to be protected.” Which is exactly what the rules are supposed to do. An objective of the FCC is to keep Internet Service Providers (ISPs), such as AT&T and Time Warner, from stifling creativity on the web. By definition its rule proposals will have to give some preference to content providers over ISPs.
Jagdev also maintains that unrestricted use: surfers running amok, visiting whatever site they pleased, would clog bandwidth and diminish the experience of all users. According to Jagdev: "SAS has already identified that a tiered billing model, in which users pay more money for higher bandwidth packages, is perhaps the most likely solution to remedy the problem of consumer inequality in the future and generate revenues."
Problem here is the FCC hasn’t ruled out such billing practices. What the ISPs have discovered is when applying them consumers rebel, forcing the ISPs to backtrack. The FCC isn’t the problem here, we are.
Ian Williams, of The Inquirer, notes that Jagdev also seems to think that the rules proposed by the FCC are new--they aren’t. Rather the FCC is trying to maintain the status quo. But this certainly isn’t Jagdev’s only misunderstanding of the FCC’s actions.
As Jagdev’s advice was offered without charge, it is safe to assume we got what we paid for.
Image Credit: markrabo/flickr, Nicholas Vigneron/Wickipedia Commons
Tiered Bandwidth
Submitted by Hg Dragon on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 1:21pm
The problem isn't necessarily with tiered badwidth/tiered billing, but with data caps. No one has a problem paying for higher speeds. Hell, that's part of the reason why I moved to FiOS form TimeWarner. I got almost twice as much speed for the same cost. But when ISP's start saying "Hey, you can only pass this much data, then we'll either cut you off for the rest of the month or charge you out the ass for it," all the while gouging you for the same already high base price when other people get unlimited usage, (TimeWarner/Comcast, I'm looking at you...) that's when the problems start.
If you sign up for a limited-data plan, to save a bit of money, then that's one thing. You get what you ask for. If the ISP's want to blame the hackers and pirates for sucking up all of the Intarwebz, then they should do something about them (and everyone knows that they really, really could if they wanted to).
i think its funny that your
Submitted by ken247113 on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 4:59pm
i think its funny that your have high speeds but only to have data caps. if you think about, you get higher speeds so you can be faster right? wouldnt that also mean you reach that cap so much faster?
Piracy is an Unstoppable Force
I pretty much agree with
Submitted by dag1992 on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 2:01pm
I pretty much agree with everything you've said, but the main issue is the infrastructure and how it's failing.
why isn't japan having
Submitted by ken247113 on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 4:57pm
why isn't japan having problems like this? they have much faster internet for the same or lower rate. the infastructure is failing because the companies are too busy price gouging their customers and getting as much profit as possible. if the isps had turn more of the profits back into making improvments then we wouldnt be having this problem
Piracy is an Unstoppable Force
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






