Twitter Easier on the Environment than Google

8

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

avenger48

Either way, just turning on the average MaximumPC-level computer for more than 10 minutes probably uses more energy than an average Google or Twitter user generates just from searching/tweeting in a year. 

avatar

thegamepro

I couldn't care less about my co2 footprint.  The whole global warming thing is a scam.  Just google "Climategate" and you'll find out why.

avatar

avenger48

Congratulations, Gamepro, you get it.  I'm so tired of rapidly expanding government, all in the name of "being green"

avatar

rseding91

Do you know what this means?!

For every person who switches to tiwtter i've got to perform 1 more google search!

*Googles a bunch of random stuff* There, that should make up for the green freeks.

 

If this gets to out of hand i'll have to setup an automated googler!

avatar

bigglesandginger

My shoelaces are more green that both twitter and google.  And when compared to twitter successfully answer as many questions I pose to it.

avatar

Vano

Spend more time tweeting and less time Googling.

It's like asking drink water instead of jumping on one leg...two unrelated things this is!
Ridiculous. Oh, and go tweet yourself :P :D

avatar

roninnder

Actually, I would say it's more like saying "spend more time playing football in your yard and less time driving to work."  One certainly has a bigger environmental impact than the other, but I can get by completely without one and not the other.

avatar

Paul_Lilly

Not necessarily. Twitter isn't just about tweeting to the world what you had for lunch, it's also become a source of breaking news and real-time search results. See here:

http://bit.ly/aA8xMY

-Paul Lilly

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.