Symantec Study Finds Most Online Users are Victims of Cybercrime
Look around your office and spot two other people. According to a new study by Symantec, one of you has fallen victim to some type of cybercrime, including viruses, identity theft, online hacking, online harassment, online scams, phishing, and sexual predation.
The study, titled "Norton's Cybercrime Report: The Human Impact Reveals Global Cybercrime Epidemic and Our Hidden Hypocrisy," pegs the victim rate of U.S. based surfers at 73 percent, one of the highest victimized nations in the world behind Brazil and India (tied at 76 percent) and China (83 percent).
"Are we just passively accepting our fate? No, of course, we feel extreme and varied emotions ranging from anger (58 percent) to fear (29 percent), helplessness (26 percent) and guilt (78 percent)," the study says. "Associate professor of psychology at Loyola Marymount University Josepth LaBrie, PhD, describes a 'learned helplessness' for online victims. 'It's like getting ripped off at a garage -- if you don't know enough about cars, you don't argue with the mechanic. People just accept a situation, even if it feels bad.'"
According to Symantec, most victims never report cybercrime, and the vast majority don't expect cybercriminals to be brought to justice. One of the reasons for this is that most online crooks reside in foreign countries, which presents a challenge for law enforcement.
You can read the full study here.

![]()
JohnP
September 08, 2010 at 10:18am
I swear, the number and severity of Symantec's "studies" just keep growing and growing and gorwing... Why? Because they are facing EXTINCTION by free anti-Virus software! So what do they do? Try to create new customers by scaring the shirt off of them.
BTW, IF Symantec is one of the leaders of anti whatever and this number of people are getting scammed, shouldn't Symantec be SUED for their products NOT protecting people?
MPC, PLEASE, PLEASE stop publishing corporate "studies" unless there are at least TWO independent studies NOT CONNECTED to the company that give the same results. Its called a NON BIASED study, nothing to do with this bullcrap!
![]()
OliverSudden
September 08, 2010 at 8:07am
Of all the anti-virus/anti-malware solutions I've used, I'd say "passively accepting" is the perfect way to describe Norton's products. A sieve comes to mind. The New Orleans levy system had fewer breaches. OK, maybe I'm being a bit hyperbolic for effect.
![]()
whr4usa
September 08, 2010 at 12:00pm
I completely agree! symantec & norton fail
my free security software 'toolbox' includes 64-bit Microsoft Security Essentials ... MalwareBytes ... Look In My PC ... HiJack This . . . AND due diligence + common sense + hardening during initial install + Trendnet wired router with default deny rule for incoming connections that actually works . . . Oh wait none of that last part classifies as a 'software' lol. mea culpa!

















