Rumor: Nvidia G92 and G94 Chips are Failing Too
No one has been more critical of Nvidia then rumor and news outlet The Inquirer, who recently declared that all of the chipmaker's G84 and G86 parts are bad. The extent of the problem is still to be determined, but here's what's known so far.
- A batch of bad GPUs have found their way into the wild causing an "abnormal failure rate" among certain laptop models
- To deal with the problem, Nvidia said it was setting aside a one-time hit of $150 to $200 million to cover warranty and repair costs associated with the faulty mobile parts
- Both HP and Dell have released a list of notebook models potentially affected by the faulty GPUs and are encouraging owners to update their BIOS as a preventive measure (the newer BIOS kicks on the cooling fan earlier than it normally would). HP has also extended their warranty for the affected models.
Nvidia has since moved on to its 9-M series GPUs, and in the process has presumably solved whatever problem affected the previous generation parts, right? Not so fast, says the The Inq. According to the rumor site, the fundamental flaw in the manufacturing process still exists, and now G92 and G94 parts are reportedly failing. The Inq claims that no less than four partners are already seeing the new chips go bad at high rates, and believes that Nvidia "is simply stonewalling everyone" about the alleged problem.
If true, another batch of parts could be disastrous for the chip maker, who continues to lose graphics market share to Intel and has seen its stock price plummet in the wake of a disappoint 8-K filing.
Is the problem bigger than Nvidia's letting on, or will it be this latest rumor that ultimately turns out to be the dud?

Image Credit: Nvidia
![]()
vläd
August 14, 2008 at 9:11pm
In a rwesponse to the article that the INQ posted cocerning the nVidia failures, The Tech report put up a poll of users, asking if the chips/cards are actually failing, ( http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/15302 ).
So far it seems that only 14% are reporting failures.
![]()
gatorXXX
August 16, 2008 at 3:32am
14% is still WAY to high. Would you buy a new porsche if 14% of them crapped out on you while on vacation? Thats would be called a recall and possibly considered a lemon.
![]()
damicatz
August 12, 2008 at 4:19pm
Please stop using The Inquirer as a serious source of information because it damages your own credibility. It's little more than a tabloid and as far as journalism goes, it's a joke.
What we have here is an opinion piece disguised as news by someone with a blatant anti-nVidia bias who can't even get his facts straight. For starters, a possion distribution is not the same thing as a bell curve. In fact, they are quite the opposite of each other.
Second, a few pieces of second-hand and third-hand information from a few disgruntled nVidia customers doesn't mean that the G92/G94 chips are failing at abnormally high rates.
The article itself is little more than a poorly disguised anti-nVidia opinion piece with a bunch of hasty generalizations, half-truths and out-of-context second-hand information.
![]()
gatorXXX
August 12, 2008 at 4:56pm
They were right about the first failing gpu's. They were right about John Edwards (the joke he is) 2 weeks before we heard it on the news ( go go rush limbaugh!). Not saying they are right about this particular incident but they could be!!!! You never know! Besides the end of the world is comming soon and we have a secret relationship with aliens that's supposed to stop it from happening!!!! WOOHOO!! And yes they are affiliated with the National Inquirer.
![]()
mlee19
August 12, 2008 at 4:05pm
Nvidia seems to be really sucking lately.Just when I was concidering giving them a try, reading about more issues makes it difficult to even want to buy one.















