Rumor: Leaked Intel Slides Show 8-Core Architecture
It won't be long before single-core processors will seem as antiquated as single-speed CD-ROM drives, and the case could be made that we're already there. Dual- and quad-core processors rule the landscape, and while Intel's upcoming Core i7 has enthusiasts frothing at the mouth, the chip maker may have something even more mouth watering in the very near future.
If the latest rumor turns out to be true, expect a replacement architecture for Nehalem in 2010 which will double the number of cores per die to eight. Codenamed Sandy Bridge, alleged leaked slides suggest the new architecture will also support hyperthreading, giving the eight-core chip a generous 16 threads to work with. Also look for 16MB of L3 cache to find its way onto the chip.
But for all the hardware goodness, it's the software that may end up playing the biggest role in performance improvements. Intel will reportedly introduce a new instruction set called Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) that will eventually supersede SSE. AVX will double the size of instructions to 256 bits and will be capable of performing up to four calculations in a single instruction.
With over a year to go before the supposed new architecture makes a debut, will developers be ready by then to take advantage of the additional cores and new instruction set?
![]()
Image Credit: Intel
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
CrimsonFrost
August 18, 2008 at 11:15am
I thought Nehalem, or i7 had 8 cores in it already? I guess this new one is like all in one die(native), whereas i7 is two Quad dies on the same chip? Or am I mistaken?
![]()
sirphunkee
August 18, 2008 at 12:07pm
Nehalem will have 4 physical cores, but with Hyperthreading, the CPU can actually run twice that many threads at once. Think of it as splitting each core into 2 'virtual cores'.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/exclusive_we_build_first_nehalem_system_dont_tell_intel?page=0%2C1 Check out pics 7 and 8 on the second page of that article
![]()
CrimsonFrost
August 18, 2008 at 12:21pm
Ok, yeah you're right, I looked at the CPU-Z screenshot. I thought there were two different versions like a 4 core and an 8.
![]()
Pentium 0
August 18, 2008 at 3:27pm
I think there was supposed to be 8 cores but intel doesnt need to obviesly. Atleast thats what i gathered a few months ago.
![]()
Talcum X
August 18, 2008 at 11:14am
But saftware always has to catch up to hardware. Something like multi threaded apps/games were slow to lauch except those enterprise apps already existing. And to go from 2 to 4, then to 8. I dont know how much more complicated the code gets, but I'm sure it will take some time before we see anyting that the common person will use to take advantage of it.
***********
Every morning is the dawn of a new error.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















