Rumor: Is Google Drive Still Alive?
Rumors of a Google branded cloud storage solution are almost as old as the company itself, but yet, it never materialized. The search giant offers a ton of solutions to help migrate your computing needs online, but when it comes to managing files they have been pretty slow to respond. In Steven Levy’s in-depth look at the inner workings of Google titled “In The Plex”, he claims Googlers viewed files as an outdated concept, and uses that logic to explain why the Gdrive never came to be. Years of silence, combined with recent confirmation in print would normally have lead us to write of the service for good, but according to TechCrunch, we might in-fact finally see a Gdrive after all.
The evidence of the service’s existence was captured by social media consultant name Johannes Wignad, showing what appears to be a modified version of Google Docs. The redesign appears to be better suited to managing files, as opposed to just static documents, and could well be an internal change being tested by the Google staff prior to roll out. TechCrunch also claims to have inside information suggesting that it will be more than just Windows Live Skydrive style web storage, and will even include a Dropbox style sync client for the desktops and mobile devices.
Do you have a hole in your life that the Gdrive could fill? Or is Dropbox taking care of your needs?
(Image Credit: TechCrunch.com)
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
Jormungandr
September 25, 2011 at 4:47pm
files? an outdated concept? rofl... thats funny as hell.
Whether you are storing the data in a file or a mySQL table the concept is essientially the same. Even if you put all your data in seperate mySQL tables the necesities of file management means they would work and function just like files at the end of the day. And putting your data in mySQL tables is exactly what you are doing when you use google docs... so... yeh.
The *term* "file" might die... but the concept never will. It might get heavily obfuscated or change how they are arranged on storage media... but files as a concept will always exist no matter what name they go by or the details of how they are stored.
![]()
therestorestore
September 25, 2011 at 2:48pm
I like dropbox and sugarsync, they seem to have a very refined product.
If google would weigh into the file storage game, you know it would be free, offer a temptingly large space, and be paid for by (gasp) ads, that (gasp) you know are spawned somehow by the contents of your files.
Not that I haven't been using gmail since it was invite only anyway, but what kind of privacy concerns would there be?
I actually know more than one person who refuses to use google in any way because of the privacy concerns.
![]()
Jormungandr
September 25, 2011 at 4:39pm
Meh. Ether your data will get included as part of Google's services or when it gets crawled by their spiders. Hiding it behind the privacy claims of services like dropbox is ultimately no safer than hiding behind googles own privacy claims. One errant line in a robots.txt and google will archive your data for all time. And google's track record as far as security goes is some where between stellar and unbelievable.
Regardless... the permanent record arived a decade ago. Fighting it now is a bit pointless. The only real way to avoid it is to never put anything online you dont want stored by third parties.
EDIT: and regarding robots.txt and login based security... up until a few years ago even the US military was having trouble with this. There was a cottage industry of people doing google searches to find out classified information, such as the current locations of aircraft cariers.
![]()
aarcane
September 25, 2011 at 1:43pm
I'm looking for a less-expensive alternative to amazon S3 for storage for amanda backups.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.



















