Roadmap Slide Pegs Windows 8 for 2012
Posted 11/20/09 at 07:00:42 PM by Ryan Whitwam
An interesting Microsoft product roadmap has turned up. The document shows the year 2012 as the tentative timeframe for a “major release” code named Windows 8. This would put it at about three years out from the release of Windows 7. The interval between Vista and Win 7 was also three years. This could signal a new regular release cycle for Microsoft. No indication if the “code name” will stick, or if Redmond will decide to change naming schemes once again.
Vista was pushed back three years from its original release date after much of the code was scrapped. If this image is to be believed, Microsoft is confident in its ability to avoid such delays again. The timeframe fits with previous rumors we’ve heard, so there’s no reason to be overly skeptical.
Is the three year plan reasonable? We’ll have to wait and see what Microsoft can cook up in another three years.
I agree, with service pack
Submitted by quickone on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 8:06am
I agree, with service pack updates we don't need a new OS every 3
years, hardware/software are advancing pretty quick but I have a hard
time believing Win7 will be so far behind the times that a SP wouldn't
bring it in line with what is current. Then again, 6 years was WAY to
long from XP to Vista, I think that was part of the problem with Vista,
people got too comfortable with XP, to attached, that and a rocky
start, it was a good but failed OS. 4 years seems much more reasonable
with 3 or so service packs.
~~The difference between insanity and genius is merely succes~~
while i agree on all your
Submitted by nekollx on Mon, 11/23/2009 - 9:47am
while i agree on all your points 3 years seems fine to me. But I'm hoping they smoth out the upgrade process by 8. Oh how grand it would be to install win 8 and not have to reinstall my programs...
On a side note wasnt a MS rep quoted on twiter as "investigating 128-bit" in such a case a new OS and a Bit increase every 3 years seems fine.
2012 - 128 bit
2015 - 256 bit
2018 - 564 bit
2021 - 728 bit
2024 - 1 Megabit!?
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
I'm a PC
Submitted by Shalbatana on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 7:07am
Unless they maintain 98-100% backwards compatability, 3 years is too soon. You're saying I might have to upgrade each of my programs to run on the new OS every three years. Do I want to pay for a new version of my OS and photoshop and 7 other expensive programs every three years? I don't own a Mac for a reason!
_______________________________
"There's no time like the future."
Submitted by dj-anon on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 3:51pm
Maybe MS should adopt smaller and more frequent updates to the OS like OSX and linux.
Submitted by Devo85x on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 7:29am
Service packs...
Submitted by DBsantos77 on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 12:18am
I totally agree.
-Santos
Submitted by LVmonkey on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 11:28am
Vista Server! Oh wait.. lol maybe they should ditch deadlines all together and worry about making something great rather than focus on when they can recoup money on the development cycle.
The other thing i should note is that MS's technical CEO type guy was very much interested in pushing a 'cloud' OS in a Wired article this year. That could very well be it.
Want an OS that is in the Cloud? If I read it correctly the article suggested that it is fully functional if on the internet (and your up to date on your monthly payments) but gimped if not. Interesting step but I would not be so interested to go in that direction myself...
Submitted by mattman059 on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 9:08am
I dont feel that Operating systems should follow the same development timeline as say video games or movies. Such as..I can see a video game having a sequel come out every 2-3 years...that makes sense, same thing for movies... but an Operating System??? I just find it hard to believe that there was THAT much more they could have done with Win7 that Win8 needs to be so soon.
Submitted by To0nces on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 6:39am
So what would be the pointof Windows 8 exactly? The only reason we needed Windows 7 was because they botched up Vista. They seemed to have fixed that with Windows 7 so I have a hard time seeing a need for this.
Submitted by jlh304 on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 2:29pm
Maybe windows 8 is the code name for the new server OS. That seems a little more likely to me. I'm sure by that time there could be improvements made to Windows 7. Just by the simply fact that hardware will continue to march forward.
Submitted by dag1992 on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 1:22pm
You sound like some XP users I know, but each to their own.
Submitted by roninnder on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 11:01am
So there you have it, mark it down. On 21 November 2009, just one month after its release, To0nces has declared that Windows 7 is the perfect operating system, and will never need to be replaced. Congratulations everyone, you now have access to the OS you will be using on your death bed.
Submitted by DBsantos77 on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 12:19am
ROFLCOPTER
-Santos
Submitted by K0BALT on Fri, 11/20/2009 - 6:44pm
Hope it's before Decemeber 21st
Submitted by austin43 on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 1:06pm
like it matters...
Submitted by Black Lable 69 on Fri, 11/20/2009 - 6:31pm
Will support & reliability be maintained?
Connect with Maximum PC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Must Read Articles
-
Feature -
Feature -
How-To -
Feature -
Feature
This Month's Issue
FEATURE29 Essential PC SkillsFEATUREAndroid Power Users GuideHOW TOGet Linux Power of Your Windows PCFEATUREMotherboard ManiaWHITE PAPERIntel's Light Peak
Maximum PC on Facebook
© 2010 Future US, Inc. All rights reserved.