RIAA Declares DRM is Dead, Has Hell Frozen Over?
Posted 07/20/09 at 06:15:27 PM by Paul Lilly
Comments
Print
Email
We've been outspoken as anyone when it comes to draconian DRM measures, but we never thought we'd see the day when the RIAA declares DRM is dead. And now that it has, we're a little bit worried - could this be a sign of the apocalypse?
Consider that just two years ago, RIAA chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol said "DRM serves all sorts of pro-consumer purposes." Consumers, of course, held a decidedly different opinion and the growing demand for DRM-free music has led to numerous music services and labels offering music without digital restrictions. Nevertheless, the RIAA predicted a comeback for DRM last year, but is now singing a different tune.
"DRM is dead, isn't it?," said Jonathan Lamy, chief spokesperson for the RIAA, when asked about the RIAA's view on DRM for an upcoming SCMagazine article.
Lamy's comment was in reference to the DRM-less iTunes store and other online services offering unrestricted music. And while the rest of us have known this for awhile, this is the first time that the RIAA has said on record that DRM is dead. Let's hope it stays that way.
Image Credit: bajainsider.com
Something Sinister
Submitted by Trooper_One on Tue, 07/21/2009 - 11:48am
""DRM is dead, isn't it?," said Jonathan Lamy, chief spokesperson for the RIAA"
Feels like there's something sinister on the horizon.
They're coming...
Submitted by Trooper_One on Tue, 07/21/2009 - 11:48am
""DRM is dead, isn't it?," said Jonathan Lamy, chief spokesperson for the RIAA"
Feels like there's something sinister on the horizon.
They're coming...
Submitted by tehR0XX0Rz on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 6:15pm
OK. Now if the industry can cut digital audio download prices by 75% while making 320kbps and FLAC available, then people can stop messing with bit torrent crap and buy good music at reasonable prices.
What, a dollar-per-song is
Submitted by I Jedi on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 7:32pm
What, a dollar-per-song is too much for you to petty up? Companies have to be able to make some sort of profit that is meaningful.
I would be willing to pay
Submitted by yogurt80 on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 9:16pm
I would be willing to pay .75-$100 per sonf for a high bit-rate, FLAC song with no DRM.
Submitted by yogurt80 on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 6:01pm
So... Does this mean they're going t kill the Blu-Ray managed copy before it starts? I think BRMC is the stupidest idea ever. I have to pay extra to back up a movie I paid for? No thanks.
Why does the RIAA insist on
Submitted by DBsantos77 on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 5:58pm
Why does the RIAA insist on releasing these dumbass comments?
Submitted by TechJunkie on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 3:31pm
Then the RIAA needs to drop ALL pending charges on anyone that have been taken to court and all settlements that have procured needs to be paid back with interest and legal fees.
Submitted by Vegan on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 4:13pm
What does their new opinion of DRM (not that I believe them) have to do with that, if I may ask? "DRM is dead" does not equate to "We won't pursue the illegal distribution of music".
it has nothing to do with
Submitted by nekollx on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 4:31pm
it has nothing to do with it, except 90% of their cases hing on "this is a violation of DMC" if DMC is dead you cant turn around and then persecute DMC violation
it like someone sating "selling ice cream with sprinkles is dead" then suing anyone who doesn't use sprinkles
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
Submitted by Cyberdiver on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 7:53pm
The cases hinge on DMC not DRM. Lack of DRM does nothing to diminish DMC.
Submitted by nekollx on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 3:58pm
including TPB since they entired biased case hinged on DMC
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
Submitted by Asterixx on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 4:54pm
Nunc est bibendum!
I think you're confusing "DRM" with "DMCA".
DRM = Digital Rights Management, a bunch of schemes the RIAA (and MPAA, and game and software companies - Windows Activation and Windows WGA are two types of DRM) use to prevent copying.
DMCA = Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a bunch of laws that makes it illegal to circumvent DRM schemes.
Just because some companies may stop using DRM does not make it legal to circumvent DRM schemes. Similarly, if Sony decided today to stop using DRM on its future PS3 games, it's still illegal to circumvent any DRM on existing titles.
...and DRM or no, it's still illegal to provide copyrighted material for unauthorized downloads. Don't hold your breath waiting for the RIAA's refund checks...
Submitted by nekollx on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 5:31pm
DMCA = Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a bunch of laws that makes it illegal to circumvent DRM schemes.
But if DRM is Dead your effectivly saying
DMCA = Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a bunch of laws that makes it illegal to circumvent a useless and non functional scheme, a dead horse.
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
Submitted by Cyberdiver on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 8:01pm
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a US copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the WIPO. It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures (commonly known as DRM) that control access to copyrighted works. It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself. In addition, the DMCA heightens the penalties for copyright infringement on the internet.
Really never thought this would happen.
Submitted by JohnP on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 3:05pm
Of course, this will last only until another "foolproof" DRM scheme comes along.
DRM free movies? That would defintely be the sign of the second coming...
Submitted by I Jedi on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 7:41pm
Well, imo, the consumer is almost always going to win battles like these overtime. Businesses use to once care about their customers and use to treat them like royalty. Now-a-days companies punish customers for buying their products and find ways to piss their base-line off. When it comes to the digital age of media, you will find that people will always find ways around company based bs that hurts the end consumer. Rather it be passing around a Windows CD key, or giving your friend a ripped DRM-free music. Companies need to go back to the ideal that the customer deserves respect and shouldn't be treated as a criminal for buying their products. They need to also offer insintives for buying products from them. This won't stop piracy, but it will, imo, slow it down to a point where the company makes a good enough profit, even with a minimal loss.
Submitted by nekollx on Tue, 07/21/2009 - 8:39am
amen, i'm tired of paying these companies to be treated like criminal
------------------------------
Coming soon to Lulu.com --Tokusatsu Heroes--
Five teenagers, one alien ghost, a robot, and the fate of the world.
Well I've seen a few movies
Submitted by dag1992 on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 3:26pm
Well I've seen a few movies with a digital copies. Sadly the DRM is still there.
Must Read Articles
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature
Most Popular Articles
This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works
Technology News
Computer Cooling Fans
Computer Cases
PC Game Controllers
PC Games
Computer Hardware
Headphones
MP3 Players
Stream Video
Computer Mouse
Monitors
Motherboards
NAS Storage
Networking
Laptop Computers
DVD Burner
Digital Cameras
Portable Storage
Computer Accessories
Smartphone
Antivirus Software
Sound Cards
Speakers
Computer Systems
Thumb Drives
Video Cameras
Video Card Reviews
Water Cooling
Gadgets
- Keyboards
© 2009 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.