Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
News

Report: Integrated Graphics Living on Borrowed Time

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Integrated graphics has run its course and will soon become virtually extinct, according to a new report by Jon Peddie Research (JPR). The prediction? In just four years time, IGPs won't even make up 1 percent of all GPUs shipped.

That's in stark contrast to 2008, in which integrated graphics accounted for 67 percent of all graphics chips shipped. But JPR sees IGPs stronghold weakening to just 20 percent by 2011, resulting in a significant gains for both the discrete GPU market and emerging CPU+GPU technologies.

If JPR is correct, it will be interesting to see how Intel fares in an IGP-less world. The No. 1 CPU chip maker also accounts for roughly half of all desktop and notebook graphics, a position made possible due to the demand for IGP chipsets. Both Intel and AMD (Fusion) are working on CPUs with embedded graphics, which JPR believes will be a strong segment starting sometime between 2010 and 2012. For Intel's part, the company thinks it will be ready to serve the desktop (Clarkdale) and notebook (Arrandale) markets with CPUs with embedded graphics cores by the end this year, and AMD's Fusion is expected sometime in 2011.

COMMENTS
avatarA joke and not a joke

I understand some of this diatribe. It makes plenty of sense with the increasing amount of video encoding going on to have a GPU that takes more and more of that process off of the CPU, hense many points for the Add in card to continue its progression so that we can process 100 gigs of video and continue to use our machine like nothing else was going on.

On the other hand it is like saying that the home server will go down the tubes just like wireless home networks. When you build a home FILE server, and I emphasize FILE, all of the hard video work should have been done before the file got there. And yes I know there are reasons to have high power video even on a server, but not for the mass market variety. As we grow the need for mass storage in the household, we are finding that thanks to articles like in Max PC, we can turn budget PC's into decent power home servers, and our only need for video is a decent video interface that performs well enough. So a micro ATX board that is reliable and gives video as well as a $40 video card and costs $60 out the door....should I buy a $200 video card for that server.....do not think so. All I need that server to do is direct the 1's and 0's to go from point a to point b or c or d. The $200 card is on the receiving PC.

Max PC made an excellant point demonstrating that old junker PC's headed for a landfill or a givaway to Grandma may have more horsepower than bright and shiny new stuff you can buy in the marketplace.

 Now I can't shut up without the Green factor statement. With some new equipment, hard drives, mobo etc you can go ground up and be very conservitive on power...... I read some numbers on what I am building but until I get the in line power sucker meter in line, I will not brag.

Login or register to post comments
avatarIntegrated Graphics

GPU in the CPU is integrated graphics, any way you want to call it.  Suits me fine, since as other readers said, not everyone needs or wants the late$t hottest graphics card.  I've built many computers for people, and they are fine with integrated graphics.  In fact, they often are pleased with the cost savings.  Not one person has ever called me to complain that the graphics are slow, etc.  Now, if I know that person was going to be playing the latest games at max res, I would order components accordingly, including a fast video card (and bill according).  I don't see integrated graphics, either on the mb or embedded in the cpu, going away.

Login or register to post comments
avatarMay be not

my latest purchased laptop contain Ati HD3200 IGP which is definitely not spectacular but at least it permits for some games to run smoothly (i.e. fifa 2009, call of duty 2 ...) and it yield 1200 score using 3D mark 06. that is definitely better than Intel integrated solutions.

MPC is my home page

Login or register to post comments
avatarDie a Painfull Death

The faster onboard graphics dies the better for everyone.

Login or register to post comments
avatarWhy?

You must be a nVidia fan boy. 75% of the computers have onboard graphics and they work fine for what the computer was ment to be used for. The only time home users need a video card is to play 3D games and there looseing ground to the console games so we don't realy need video cards in our PC.

Login or register to post comments
avatarconsole retard! Games are

console retard!

Games are always better on the PC

Login or register to post comments
avatarI have PC

I have PC 22" LCD with nVidia 9800 gt OC works good But XBOX 360 runs 1080p on my 42" 1080p LCD I also have PS3,Wii. It's just a mater of chioce.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI say no

I just talked my girl into installing Steam and buying World of Goo and watched her play it fine on her laptop with integrated graphics. As long as there are people that do nothing but surf the internet and play casual games, there will always be a market for those that don't need 800Mhz, 1 gig of DDR3 and 240 stream processors worth of graphics power.

Login or register to post comments
avatarGPU on CPU isn't

GPU on CPU isn't integrated?  They're idiots.  Jon Peddie Research obviously doesn't know what they're talking about.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI don't think so

I hope that they're right...but I really think they're wrong.  I see IGPs becoming more and more popular.  Eventually, everyone except for the most extream gamers will be sporting integrated graphics. IMHO.

Login or register to post comments
avatarOnly If

Only if chip manufacturers would stop making crappy IGPs.  Plus there are a lot of applications for independent graphics processors other than gaming.

Login or register to post comments
avatarOnly Intel makes truly

Only Intel makes truly crappy graphics, both the HD3200 and the 9400M are decent IGP's for doing anything more than email and less than "real" gaming

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works