Redmond Preps Spending Binge to Roll Out 'Bing' Search Engine
Posted 05/26/09 at 03:45:23 PM by Mark Edward Soper
Ready, aim, SPEND! That's the approach Microsoft is planning for Bing, its new search engine, Advertising Age reports. How much coin is Redmond prepared to spend to market Bing (previously code-named Kumo)? Somewhere is the $80-100 million range, Ad Age says, compared to Google's non-recruitment ad spending in 2008 of around $13 million. But, can spending 6-8 times as much as Google give Bing the jump it needs?
Microsoft's ad push (helmed by ad-agency powerhouse JWT) will not, unlike the recent anti-Apple campaign, mention Microsoft's search rivals - instead, the planned ads will ask consumers if search works as well as they'd like.
How about the product itself?
People who've seen the Microsoft product suggest it's useful and has some nifty filtering tools, even though it's not a markedly different-looking interface, at least for text search (some of the multimedia search results, however, do look quite different from how Google currently displays them).
When will Bing shove aside Live Search? The Register says "June," and also suggests keeping an eye on the D: All Things Digital conference this week for more details.

What?
Submitted by TheKhaos24 on Mon, 06/22/2009 - 10:50am
I just dont understand why you care so much about the names? Does it really matter? The name doesnt matter as long as it is good, and Bing is very good
Seriously, do they think we
Submitted by aviaggio on Tue, 05/26/2009 - 4:02pm
Seriously, do they think we are so retarded that we can't comprehend "names" that have more than 4 letters? Bing, Kumo, Hulu, Vuze, Zune... I mean, com'n, it's getting a bit ridiculous.
lol kumo now Bing. What do
Submitted by comptech08 on Tue, 05/26/2009 - 2:07pm
lol kumo now Bing. What do those words meen anyway? Better if they called it bling. even though i prolly will never use the service.
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






