Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

News

Rambus the Patent Troll Seeks to Strike Nvidia

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Rambus, the technology company turned responsible for RDRAM has filed suit against Nvidia claiming that they violated 17 of its memory patents. Rambus’ lawsuit alleges that at least six of Nvidia's product lines infringe the Rambus patents including chip sets, graphics processors and applications processors. They ask for an injunction that would prevent Nvidia from selling the products as well as damages.

Tom Lavelle, senior vice president and general counsel at Rambus was quoted as saying, "For more than six years, we have diligently attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement with Nvidia, but our good faith efforts have been to no avail," he adds, "We are left with no other recourse than litigation to protect and seek fair compensation for the use of our patented inventions,".

Can you smell the bull? I better get my rubber boots it’s getting thick. His own statement shows this to be an attempt to force Nvidia to cough up something to make Rambus go away and they haven't been interested. Nvidia has yet to comment on the suit.

RDRAM went to hell in a hand basket and was relegated to a few consoles and peripherals. Little else has come from Rambus for PCs since, except a stream of lawsuits against several of the world's top DRAM manufacturers.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ruled in 2006 that Rambus used anticompetitive practices in some of its memory patents. But that ruling was overturned appeals cases early this year.

Rambus has turned Patent Troll, and this could signal many more lawsuits to come from them. Since Lavelle as senior VP is also the general counsel, perhaps Rambus intends to become a law firm and sue it’s way to making a buck. We can hope they may eventually bite off more than they can chew.

Rambus Patent Troll
COMMENTS:4
COMMENTS
avatarPatent Troll?

Perhaps you should investigate what you are saying instead of perpetuating myths spread through propaganda on the Web. The statements you have made in your article about Rambus are not only untrue, but your entire argument falls apart on the premise that a company can actually make money by suing.  In fact the coffers at Rambus stay low BECAUSE of the lawsuits.  In the case of NVIDIA attempts were made for 6 years to get them to pay royalties for Rambus inventions before Rambus threw in the towel and realized they had no choice but to sue to get paid for their inventions.  There seems to be a widespread illness that is threatening the ability of inventors to develop new technologies....use it, but don't pay....you can get away with it. But not for much longer. If you study recent developments in court proceedings surrounding Rambus, it should lead you to realize that your characterization of Rambus is wrong.  I can only hope that you then would publish a story that tells the real truth about Rambus...that they have been wronged for a very long time by crooks who have used their inventions without compensating them.

Login or register to post comments
avatarI wouldnt mind seeing what

I wouldnt mind seeing what the supposed patents are that were violated.  Maybe it's justified?  Maybe not?

Login or register to post comments
avatarEnd of the Patent Troll...

Sick MLT on 'em... that ought to put an end to the Patent Troll in fairly short order!

Microsoft

Legal

Team

Login or register to post comments
avatarMaybe we ought to see if

Maybe we ought to see if the RIAA can come after these companies, I'm sure a number of their employees have illegally downloaded music. :P

- mike_art03a
IT Technician
Gov't of Canada

Login or register to post comments
This Month's Issue
FEATURE Build a Crazy-Fast $647 PCFEATURE Six Single-Band 802.11n Routers ReviewedHOW TOTweak BitTorrent and FirefoxFEATUREClose Look at ClarkdaleWHITE PAPERLCD Panel Technology