Oracle Suing Google Over Android
Oracle has issued a statement today saying that they have filed suit against Google for patent and copyright infringement. The target for the lawsuit is reportedly Google's Android mobile operating system. According to Oracle's Karen Tillman, "[Google] knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle's Java-related intellectual property." Oracle acquired Java maker Sun last year.
No details are yet available on just what aspects of Android Oracle believes infringes on their intellectual property. The majority of apps on Android are written in Java, and are compiled on the phone. The suit could be related to how Android interprets that code. Several months ago, Apple took legal action against HTC for their use of Android, but did not go after Google itself. Oracle however, is going up against the Big G toe to toe.
We'll keep an eye on this as it develops. It is possible this will be quickly resolved with a cross-licensing deal. Anyone care to place a wager on what Google's response will be?

Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
machew100
August 13, 2010 at 10:34am
Lawyers are dime-a-dozen when 90%+ of all people use your money in the bank search engine
![]()
bloodgain
August 13, 2010 at 9:04am
Google's response will be Google's standard response to threats:
F^%# you, we're Google.
![]()
paladrache
August 13, 2010 at 7:40am
Just driving right on by Oracle HQ, pretending to take streetview pictures, when they were actually hacking Oracles wireless networks and stealing the datas.
![]()
DJSPIN80
August 13, 2010 at 5:02am
Oracle's acquisition of Sun was one of the worst things to happen in computing. I don't know if Oracle understands but Java's lost its most prized developer (James Gosling) and they're losing respect from the very community that they should be representing (i.e., Java developers).
Anyways, it turns out (according to Wikipedia), Sun licensed most of its Java compiler to GPL and there were alternatives such as the GNU Java compiler that stemmed from the licensure. If Google can prove that its Java compiler uses the GPL version rather than the Sun version, I'm sure they won't have any problems.
![]()
misha573
August 13, 2010 at 4:10am
I agree with the prevailing sentiment thus far. I thought it was absolutely horrid that Oracle got its grubby hands on Java. Despite all the talk, Oracle has never come across as a champion for open technology and the community, and I don't think they will be (as we are begining to see) a good steward of the technology.
Now, I've read that this could be mostly about how Anrdroid is implemented (much like the issues Sun had with Microsoft's implementation of Java in windows back in the day). If that is the case then I am a bit less concerned about this...but I still do not trust Oracle with Java, MySQL, VirtualBox or any of Sun's software IP.
Oracle is just the middleware and back-end equivalent of MS imo.
![]()
jlh304
August 13, 2010 at 3:55am
I though java was open source. People use it everywhere and to my knowledge don't buy anything to use it/program. Sort of seems like that would weaken Oracle's case, but they must think they have something.
![]()
SuperiorBeing
August 13, 2010 at 1:25pm
Java isn't an open standard, which is why Microsoft developed C#, as a way to have a similar language with the features they wanted.
![]()
bikerbub
August 12, 2010 at 6:38pm
wonder why they waited so damn long. i see this going down the tubes reeeeel quick.
![]()
Zachary K.
August 12, 2010 at 5:55pm
oracle acquiring sun was bad, java was free to use and great. now it is owned by a big corporation whose only goal is getting as much cash as they can so the CEO can get another summer home and helicopter.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.
















