News

OCZ Pushes Low Cost SSDs Closer to Mainstream

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponReddit

Set up a swank RAID 0 array and you'll still find situations in which your hard drives remain the bottleneck. Higher areal densities, fast spindle speeds, and beefy cache have kept hard drives from being pokey, but the future appears headed for Solid State Drives (SSDs). And with companies like OCZ pushing higher performing SSDs at increasingly lower price points, the future may be closer than you think.

Lest we get too excited, SSD technology still trails considerably behind traditional hard drives in the cost-per-gigabyte arena, but helping to shrink the gap, OCZ today announced its Core Series SATA II 2.5" Solid State Drives. OCZ dubs the new lineup as the "world's first truly affordable high-performance SSD for consumers," and while still out of mainstream reach, this is as close to that goal as high performing SSDs have come. The three new models include:

  • 32GB - $169
  • 64GB - $259
  • 128GB - $479

OCZ's aggressive pricing trumps even Super Talent's recently announced MasterDrive MX series, but even still, paying $479 for just 128GB is nothing to scoff at, particularly when Newegg carries Western Digital's 300GB VelociRaptor for $300 shipped. But compared to where SSD pricing used to be, it might not be long before you start spec'ing out an SSD drive for your next system build or upgrade. And if all-out performance is your bag, a case could be made for jumping the gun now and slapping your OS onto a 32GB or 64GB Core SSD. They're comparatively expensive to their platter-based brethren, but won't break the bank any more than a mid- to high-end videocard will. Factor in read and write speeds to the tune of 120 to 143 MB/sec and  80 to 93 MB/sec respectively combined with a 1.5 million hour life expectancy, SSDs appear to finally be worth getting excited over.

Image Credit: OCZ

COMMENTS
avatarFormal review?

I'd love to see some benchmarks compared to the VelociRaptor and the existing, more expensive SSD's.

Login or register to post comments
avatarAh Life its not all its cracked up to be

1.5 million hour life expectancy realy, could u put that in millions of writes?

that figures about as realistic as a MTBF is on a standard HDD.. when they start claming 3 or 4 million hours maybe it will last 3 years. oh and dont run anything that uses a swap file on them youll fry them quick. right now id say there great for backups and laptops. mainstream applications wait another 18 months the next cycle should have much better specs in terms of burn out.

if all else fails...

Login or register to post comments
avatar128 GB SD Flash!!!

GOOD LORD thats alot of Pictures!

Login or register to post comments
avataryou twat thats not an SD

you twat thats not an SD card

Login or register to post comments
RESOURCE CENTER

THIS MONTH's ISSUE
FEATURE Windows Tips: Find out what works and what doesn't as we test the most commonly prescribed Windows tipsHOW TO Customize and streamline your Windows desktop Core i7 Check out Intel's next-gen chip, up close and personal The Reactor We preview the first production-ready oil-immersed PC

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?