Nvidia Launches Tesla Supercomputer, up to 960 Cores for $10,000
Posted 11/21/08 at 03:57:37 PM by Andy Salisbury
Comments
Print
Email
“Personal” and “supercomputer” aren’t words that would usually appear side by side, unless you’re a mastermind at Nvidia. With the announcement of their latest machine, the Tesla Personal Supercomputer, they’re looking to bring what was normally thought of as gigantic, to the small time.
The Tesla only costs 1/100th of what a normal supercomputer cluster would cost, and only takes up a small fraction of the space. Thanks to heterogeneous computing, the process of CPUs acting in tandem with GPUs, it all fits right into a desktop form factor.
It’s reported that the Tesla is based off of Nvidia’s CUDA architecture, making it possible for the system to be programmed in the C language. 960 cores can be working side by side inside the system, and it’s claimed that these systems are already in use at MIT, Cambridge and other environments.
How much will your own personal supercomputer run you? An admittedly reasonable 10 large. Hey, 960 cores is a bargain at that rate.
Image Credit: Nvidia
Hey Brain
Submitted by Queenof1 on Sun, 11/23/2008 - 1:11pm
what are we going do tonight?
Try and take over the world!
Submitted by Nimise08 on Sat, 11/22/2008 - 9:40am
It does not use 4 GTX280s it uses 4 TeslaC1060s($1,700 Each)
Oh, well I was just
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Sat, 11/22/2008 - 11:40am
Oh, well I was just speculating. Do these cards use the same 200series GPU's but with more ram and different drivers and bios and stuff? The stream processor count just makes me extremely suspicious.
Submitted by jvc08 on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 9:57pm
comparing it to a normal pc... how fast is it?
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 11:18pm
If the 960cores are the Stream processors in 4 Geforce GTX280 video cards then it's probably as fast as the DM2008 or maybe a little faster depending on the bench mark. I doubt that this machine comes with anything more than a quad core cpu. It's emphesis is on the CUDA meaning the GPUs though. So it's fast but I bet it's about the same as DM08 and I bet it didn't cost anywhere near 10,000dollars to manufacture.
Submitted by Germ on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 7:22pm
Blah blah blah... we all know the real question is, "Will this play the WotLK Expansion Pack"...
960 Core i7 extremes
Submitted by s3th on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 5:01pm
960 Core i7 extremes overclocked and in turbo mode lol. I wanna see some benchmarks for this beast, and put this baby in a Oil Case for maximum cooling. Surely to god that many cores would have to run at unbeleivable temperatures, its like the sun in your computer case lmao.
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 4:38pm
960 cores that sounds like 4x Geforce GTX280 video cards. A motherboard with 4 X16 PCIX 2.0 slots populated with 4 GTX280 video cards installed and a 1.5tb hard drive and a dvd burner makes a super computer running as CUDA.
So a GTX280 video card costs about $400bucks and 4 of those is about $1600dollars or so and say at least 4gigs or more of ram anywhere from $50 - $200dollars depending on if it's DDR3 or DD2.
And the latest Quad Core Extreme CPU from Intel around about $1000 dollars.
Figure $400 dollars for a motherboard and chipset that will without question come with integrated crappy audio.
Somehow that doesn't come close to $10,000 Dollars. perhaps that not so interesting case makes up the difference.
Submitted by billysundays on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 11:11pm
edit the shit outa it
Submitted by AndyYankee17 on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 2:36pm
alright, I'll ask. How fast are these cores? 940 cores doesn't mean anything if they working at 1 mhz.
core count by itself means nothing.
Submitted by viper11287 on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 11:00pm
# of Tesla GPUs - 4
# of Streaming Processor Cores - 960(240 per processor)
Frequency of processor cores - 1.4GHz
Single Precision floating point performance(peak) - 4.147 TFlops (>1TF per GPU)
Double Precision floating point performance(peak) - 345.6 GFlops
Total Dedicated Memory - 16GB
Memory Interface - 512-bit
Memory Bandwidth - 408GB/sec
Max Power Consumption - 800W
Submitted by AndyYankee17 on Sat, 11/22/2008 - 3:50pm
so it's not a supercomputer, its a really nice box? that we could all go build ourselves?
I call false advertising.
Submitted by billysundays on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 2:22pm
"Admittedly reasonable 10 large" is an understatement. How the hell is that possible. That's cheaper than this year's Dream Machine. Slap in LucidLogix's Hydra technology and we could have framerates in the thousands at unbelievable resolutions, or ray traced rendered games and believable, rich physics. You could finally make Crysis cry and beg for mercy.
Submitted by marudd2002 on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 2:34pm
So does this mean we can finally set Crysis above medium without getting single digit frame rates on tiny 20 inch monitors? wow. maybe in another 10 years we can actually put Crysis on it's highest settings on a 30 inch screen and get over 30 fps. I know it sounds crazy, but you never know right?
:P
----
Fanboys are annoying. Price/Performance is top priority. Patience=Awesome.
Submitted by theevilghost_casper on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 2:17pm
Say hello to my new gaming rig! Now will anyone lend me $10,000 :) ?
-Casper The Ghost
Must Read Articles
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature
Most Popular Articles
This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works
Technology News
Computer Cooling Fans
Computer Cases
PC Game Controllers
PC Games
Computer Hardware
Headphones
MP3 Players
Stream Video
Computer Mouse
Monitors
Motherboards
NAS Storage
Networking
Laptop Computers
DVD Burner
Digital Cameras
Portable Storage
Computer Accessories
Smartphone
Antivirus Software
Sound Cards
Speakers
Computer Systems
Thumb Drives
Video Cameras
Video Card Reviews
Water Cooling
Gadgets
- Keyboards
© 2009 Future US, Inc. All Rights Reserved.