Notebook Vendors Giving 32-Bit Vista the Boot in Favor of 64-Bit
Notebook Vendors Giving 32-Bit Vista the Boot in Favor of 64-Bit
Posted 10/28/2008 at 7:31am
| by Paul Lilly
10
Comments
Print
The decision to go with a 64-bit version of Vista over its 32-bit counterpart remains a dubious one, but not so as far as netbook vendors are concerned. Most new laptops are now shipping with a 64-bit OS. Take Best Buy's newest shipment of HP laptops, for example, who shows 11 models listed as "new arrivals." All but three come with Vista 64-bit, with the remaining models sporting Windows Vista Business downgraded to XP Pro, also in 64-bit form.
Falling memory prices could be one reason for the sudden push into 64-bit territory. Of the 9 laptops outfitted with Vista, all of them come spec'd with 4GB of RAM. But is a 64-bit OS truly necessary to take advantage of 4GB or more?
"The 64-bit versions of Windows can utilize more memory than 32-bit versions of Windows," Microsofts writes in its FAQ. "This helps minimize the time spent swapping processes in and out of memory by storing more of those processes in Random access memory (RAM) rather than on the hard disk. This, in turn, can increase overall program performance."
Running 4GB of RAM on a 32-bit OS isn't a complete waste, but because most systems will only show around 3.25GB as being installed, it's easy to see why notebook vendors would opt for a 64-bit OS to avoid customer confusion. Throw into the mix that hardware and peripheral support in Vista 64-bit is very good and it becomes a low risk option.
Hit the jump and tell us what flavor of Vista you'd prefer to have on your notebook: 32-bit or 64-bit?
More like this
randon456789
August 25, 2010 at 6:27am
Um... Intel is ignoring all antitrust rulings/settlements and has already resumed bribing/threatening computer manufacturers to set specific percentage limits on their use of AMD processors.
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2010/07/30/is-intel-fumbling-the-chinese-market.aspxMy bet is that Ontario gets used at a minimal level by a couple manufacturers to give Intel's usual illusion that AMD has access to the marketplace. Beyond that, AMD is dead. Intel reigns supreme king over the entire, monopolized computer processor market.
Yes, INTEL IS EVIL INSIDE.
<a href="http://www.vasacor.com/">lower cholesterol</a>
srt1
August 10, 2010 at 11:51pm
Our technical staff and customer’s relationship team is always ready to serve you at your destination. We guarantee to provide you the best products as well as pre sales and after sales support and services.
Keith E. Whisman
October 29, 2008 at 1:39am
Finally 64bit computing is starting to become mainstream. It's about time.
praetor_alpha
October 28, 2008 at 3:57pm
I have been running 64 bit for a little over a year, not a bsod yet on my laptop. However, my college laptop has Vista 32, for compatibility reasons, but that's only because we occasionally use some remote, experimental software.
whitneymr
October 28, 2008 at 10:54am
Now that Photoshop CS4 supports 64 bit you may finally have the app to kick things off. It makes me finally look at Vista.
Sovereign
October 28, 2008 at 10:25am
Even last year I saw a notebook on the shelf at a Sam's Club with 4GB RAM and Home Premium x64. If you have 4GB RAM I see no reason to NOT use x64. However, personally since my laptop only has 2GB RAM (and an x86-only CPU) I'm not rushing for a CPU/RAM/OS upgrade any time soon. With laptop sales surpsssing desktops and laptops becoming ever more powerful, it makes sense to push x64 operating systems.
nedwards
October 28, 2008 at 9:38am
What's so dubious about 64-bit Vista? I have had very few problems with it, and it's quite stable and works well on my system.
Paul_Lilly
October 28, 2008 at 10:00am
The decision of whether or not to go with 64-bit Vista is dubious, or of questionable value, and not the OS itself. I've been running Vista Ultimate 64-bit on my main system (and secondary systems) for a long while now and my experience mirrors yours for the most part, though the trade-off is that I'll encounter an incompatible program every now and then. I can live with that, but it's tough to call it a slum-dunk decision when the performance benefits over the 32-bit version are arguable, at least in terms of the majority of mainstream apps.
maniacm0nk3y
October 28, 2008 at 8:13am
It's stupid to buy a notebook without 2GB ram, now that it's 4 with an OS to match it's the perfect thing to do. They are slow without the speed of RAM............
Gailim
October 28, 2008 at 7:59am
the only "issue" with 64 bit OS's was support. now that the big OEMs are shipping 64 bit systems nobody can ignore them anymore. let 32 bit die, its had a good run.
Connect with MaximumPC
Featured Content
We introduce Intel's latest class of tablet killers and review 4 of the first Ultra...
Where have all the memorable videogame enemies gone?
This month's issue
Feature
11 Hardware Hacks
Feature
Overclock Your CPU
How-To
Supercharge Your Smartphone
Build It
A Powerful $830 Rig
Most Commented Articles
Latest Max PC Tweets
- maximumpc: Can RIM *ever* catch a break? Not today! App World numbers not as great as previously reported http://t.co/3ERRhr3119 hours 18 min ago
- maximumpc: Solid state shakeup: Intel 520 SSD vs OCZ Octane vs Patriot Pyro SE! http://t.co/lXDufI7w20 hours 35 min ago
- maximumpc: Woman Ordered to Decrypt Laptop Claims She "Forgot" Key http://t.co/C2TCp4Ml21 hours 29 min ago
